divorce process uk - Page 2

Potanina-v-Potanin: Divorce Experts Share their Views
Image by freepik
//

Potanina-v-Potanin: Divorce Experts Share their Views

Sean Hilton
Sean Hilton
Sital Fontenelle
Sital Fontenelle
Peter Burgess
Peter Burgess

The recent Court of Appeal ruling in London has reignited global attention on one of the most high-value divorce cases in history. Natalia Potanina, ex-wife of Russian billionaire Vladimir Potanin, has won the right to pursue a multi-billion-dollar claim for 50% of his stake in Norilsk Nickel, along with dividends and a luxury Moscow property.

Having previously received less than 1% of marital assets following their 2014 divorce, Potanina’s successful appeal marks a significant shift in what has already become a closely watched case.

To unpack the potential implications of this ruling, we asked leading experts Peter Burgess, Sital Fontenelle and Sean Hilton for their views.

Peter Burgess, partner at Burgess Mee, says:

“Today’s ruling further cements London’s position as the divorce capital of the world. Mrs Potanina’s $6bn claim has been thrown a lifeline, by the Court of Appeal allowing the claim to proceed. For UHNW individuals who have been badly served abroad, this judgment will be very welcome. Aspiring “divorce tourists” may appreciate the opportunity to demonstrate connection to this country at the substantive hearing, rather than at an earlier stage. However, this particular long-running high-value dispute may still have some way to go as it remains open to Mr Potanin to seek a further appeal to the Supreme Court.”

Sital Fontenelle, Head of the Family Law team at Kingsley Napley LLP, comments:

All lawyers to international HNWs have been watching this case, given it concerns the limits to divorce tourism and is the latest determined example of a wife testing England’s reputation for being a fair and generous forum.

The Court of Appeal has today granted Natalia Potanina’s application for leave to bring a Part III claim meaning she is permitted to bring a claim for financial remedies in this jurisdiction following a divorce and financial settlement decided after a long marriage in Russia.   

The Court of Appeal had little difficulty in concluding that Mrs Potanina has solid grounds to bring her application on the basis of her connections to this country and the ‘limited’ view of her husband’s assets that was taken in Russia. The Court even went so far as to note that it could be argued the size of her award in Russia meant her reasonable needs could not be met. It also observed she had only received a fraction of what she might have received in this country.   

This will no doubt be disappointing to her husband and will dismay those who feel our divorce courts should be dealing with more local and needy cases. As the Court of Appeal notes, this case has been running for nearly 7 years and has consumed substantial resources of the court.

Although today’s decision is, of course, fact specific, the key point is that the door is still open; it reinforces our reputation for being divorce capital of the world and importantly there was no narrowing of the test for other potential claimants who have the appetite to bring litigation here.  We will therefore remain an attractive jurisdiction for divorce cases. 

However, it is unlikely to be the end of the matter since Mr Potanin may still have the appetite to appeal further and request the Supreme Court considers the substance of this case (their original review was procedural).  

This is a blockbuster case in financial terms – with considerable £s at stake in the billions rather than millions – so we can expect it will continue to be hard fought for several years to come.”

Sean Hilton, Family Partner, Stevens & Bolton, commented:

“Today’s Court of Appeal decision in the Potanin case marks a significant moment for international divorce law in England. By allowing Natalia Potanina’s financial claims to proceed despite her divorce being finalised in Russia the court confirmed its ability to intervene where a spouse claims they have received insufficient provision from a foreign divorce. Mrs Potanina was found to have a real and meaningful connection to England – she held a UK investor visa, owned property here, and had been habitually resident for over a year. The Judge did not agree with Mr Potanin’s claim that his ex-wife was a ‘divorce tourist’.

“The court also commented that under the Russian divorce Mrs Potanina received a “tiny fraction” of the sum she would have received if she had divorced in England, and that this may be more significant when Mr Potanin is required to give disclosure of his assets here. In those circumstances the Judge commented that it would be appropriate for the court to make a further financial award to Mrs Potanina, the extent of which will need to be determined at a further hearing.   

“This decision may now open the door to a raft of applications that have been waiting in the wings for clarity. It is clear this ruling will shape how we advise international clients going forward. While the procedure for these applications has been tightened, the court have made clear that if jurisdiction is established and there’s a real prospect of success for a spouse with a meaningful connection to this country, claims may still proceed with a broad discretion afforded to Judges – perhaps supporting the view that England is the ‘divorce capital of the world’.”

Keep up to date with latest divorce news.

About Peter Burgess

Peter is one of the two founding partners at Burgess Mee Family Law.

Having trained at top family law firm Withers LLP, Peter founded Burgess Mee with in 2013, where he advises on the full spectrum of family law issues across the firm’s three offices. Peter is also an FMC accredited mediator.

Get in touch with Peter today:

  • Email
  • Call on – 0203 824 9952

About Sital Fontenelle

Sital Fontenelle is the Head of the Family & Divorce team at Kingsley Napley. She specialises in the complex financial aspects of a divorce, negotiating and drafting of nuptial agreements as well as private children law cases. She typically acts for high-net-worth individuals, often on cases involving an international dimension, offshore trusts, family businesses, inherited wealth or asset tracing. She is also highly experienced in complex children cases. Sital is an active member of the Resolution Cohabitation committee and regularly speaks at international conferences on wealth protection and trusts. She is a recognised leader in her field in legal directories, including the Chambers Ultra High Net Worth Guide, Legal 500 UK, Chambers UK (finance and children) and Spears. As well as being ‘Recommended’ in the Spear’s 2023 Family Law Index, she won silver in the Woman of the Year – Future Leaders (Partner) category at the Powerwomen Awards 2020.

About Sean Hilton

Sean assists clients on a broad spectrum of matters ranging from complex high-value financial proceedings following divorce, to disputes in relation to children. For instance, Sean advises unmarried families on the consequences of a relationship breakdown and is instructed on pre and post nuptial agreements, often with an international element. Sean is considered as a “Rising Star” by the Legal 500 Directory and in the Thompson Reuters Super Lawyers List, and has recently been shortlisted for Family Lawyer of the Year – Senior/Managing Associate in the CityWealth Future Leader Awards.

Sean’s Stevens & Bolton profile and contact details are available here:

Why You Need a Divorce Team, Not Just a Lawyer
Image by rawpixel.com on Freepik
/

Why You Need a Divorce Team, Not Just a Lawyer

chloe-o-contributor
Chloe O.
Alternative Dispute Resolution professional and Certified Divorce Coach
The Divorce and Separation Coach

When people think about divorce, the first professional who comes to mind is usually a lawyer. That is natural, since divorce has an important legal dimension. But relying on one person to guide you through every aspect of divorce is a common mistake. 

I made this mistake myself. During my divorce, my “team” consisted of my lawyer and my parents. I did not know that other professionals could support me. As a result, I agreed to financial arrangements without understanding their long-term consequences. Over time, they proved unsustainable and led to repeated renegotiations, which caused unnecessary conflict.

Divorce affects your finances, your emotional wellbeing, your children, and your long-term future. My experience taught me (the hard way!) that no single professional can provide expert support in all these areas. That is why building a divorce team is one of the most important steps you can take.

Avoiding the “one-person trap”

Money is often the greatest concern when people are separating. Many hesitate to hire more than one professional, worried about costs. Yet the unintended consequence is that they lean on their lawyer for everything: financial advice, emotional support, and sometimes even parenting guidance. This is not only expensive, but also ineffective.

Think of it like surgery on your back. You would need a surgeon, of course, but also a nurse, an anaesthetist, and afterwards a physiotherapist to get you back on your feet. Divorce is no different. You need different professionals working together to ensure every aspect is handled properly: a lawyer for legal advice, a financial adviser for money matters, a divorce coach to help you make the right decisions every step of the way, and emotional support to keep you grounded.

The professionals to consider

A divorce team does not look the same for everyone. The right mix of professionals will depend on your situation. Here are some of the key roles:

  • Lawyer – Advises on your legal rights, prepares divorce documentation, and, if necessary, represents you in court. Some lawyers specialise in areas such as high net worth cases, domestic abuse, or international divorce. Even in countries where a lawyer is not legally required, it is still wise to consult one to ensure your agreement is solid.
  • Family mediator – Works with both partners to negotiate terms, from property division to parenting arrangements. A mediator is impartial and helps keep discussions constructive.
  • Divorce coach – Helps you focus on your future goals, make clear decisions, and approach negotiations with confidence. A coach also provides practical guidance and emotional steadiness.
  • Therapist – Supports you in understanding what went wrong in the relationship, addressing trauma, and maintaining mental health.
  • Financial adviser – Reviews your assets, debts, and income, models long-term implications of settlement proposals, and helps you plan for financial stability after divorce.

While one person may cover two roles, expecting them to manage everything leaves serious gaps.

Choosing the right lawyer

Selecting the right lawyer is one of the most important decisions you will make. Too often people choose based only on price or convenience. One client of mine instructed a lawyer because he was “cheap”. Fifteen months later, she had spent tens of thousands of pounds with no progress and little trust in his advice. She eventually changed lawyers and finally moved forward.

When choosing a lawyer, consider:

  • Do they have experience with your type of case?
  • How do they communicate and how quickly will they respond?
  • Will your case be handled by them personally or mostly by a junior associate?
  • What is their approach to resolving disputes out of court?
  • Can they give you realistic visibility of likely legal costs?

If your divorce involves more than one country, you will also need someone with expertise in international divorce. Look for a lawyer who understands both jurisdictions, speaks your language, and has a network of international advisers, such as tax specialists and immigration lawyers.

How to build your divorce team

A simple exercise can help you identify where you need support. Picture a five-pointed star, with each point representing one area of support: legal, financial, emotional, practical, and personal. Write down the person or professional covering each area. One person can cover two—but no more. If you see gaps, you will know where to add expertise.

This keeps your support balanced and prevents overloading one professional or family member. Your aim is to create a well-rounded team that can carry you through divorce and beyond.

Final thoughts

Divorce is one of life’s most complex transitions. Going through it with only one professional is like attempting surgery with only a surgeon and no nurse or anaesthetist—it is simply not enough. By building a divorce team, you ensure that every dimension—legal, financial, emotional, and practical—is addressed properly.

It may feel like a bigger investment at the start, but a coordinated divorce team saves time, money, and stress in the long run. More importantly, it helps you build a stronger foundation for the next chapter of your life.

Read more articles by Chloe O.

About Chloe O.

“My name is Chloe O., I am an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) professional and a Certified Divorce Coach. I specialise in working with women to help them reduce conflict during and after divorce by improving their negotiation and communication skills with their spouse. The objective is to work towards an amicable divorce outcome in order to minimise the emotional and financial cost of divorce. I work with all types of clients but I have extensive experience in supporting expatriates and international families who are dealing with the unique situation of living abroad during and after their divorce, with limited local family support, language barriers and relocation considerations.”

For more information about my work and services (including my Podcastsnewslettermyth-buster videos…), you can visit my website and/or follow me on InstagramFacebook or LinkedIn.

Help Shape the Future of Support for Separated Families
Image by Drazen Zigic on Freepik
/////

Help Shape the Future of Support for Separated Families

Soila Sindiyo
Dr Soila Sindiyo
Counselling Psychologist and Founding Editor of The Divorce Magazine

We’ve been contacted by Dr Sarah Foley, Lecturer in Developmental Psychology at the University of Edinburgh, about an exciting new research project exploring parenting after divorce or separation.

The Parenting After Divorce or Separation Study aims to better understand family life and children’s wellbeing in different post-separation child arrangements, particularly in families who have not gone through the court system.

This research will help inform future support for separated parents and their children, filling an important gap in what we know about post-separation family experiences.

Who Can Take Part?

The research team is looking to hear from parents who:

  • Have children aged 4–8
  • Live in Scotland or England
  • Are comfortable taking part in English
  • Have been separated for at least six months
  • Have regular contact with their child
  • Do not have a court-ordered child arrangement

What’s Involved?

If you take part, you’ll be asked to:

  • Join a confidential online interview and complete a survey
  • Optionally involve your child in child-friendly storytelling or game-based activities

(These are completely optional and designed to be fun and engaging for children)

Participation is entirely voluntary and confidential.

How to Get Involved

If you meet the criteria above, or know someone who does, you can learn more and register your interest here.

For questions about the study, you can contact Dr Sarah Foley directly at:
sarah.foley@ed.ac.uk

We’ll be sharing the findings of this important research once the study is complete. By taking part, you’ll be helping to build a deeper understanding of how separated families live, parent, and thrive, and how support can be improved in the future.

Why Prenups are Losing Their Stigma - and Why More Couples Should Consider Them
Image by rawpixel.com on Freepik
/

Why Prenups are Losing Their Stigma – and Why More Couples Should Consider Them

Fiona Lazenby
Fiona Lazenby
Partner – Family
Knights

Prenuptial agreements have made a comeback into the spotlight recently – not least after Jeff Bezos tied the knot with Lauren Sánchez earlier this summer. While they continue to often be branded ‘unromantic’ or ‘pessimistic’, these agreements are quietly becoming more mainstream, with growing numbers of millennials and everyday couples separating themselves from traditional perceptions and exploring them as a pragmatic way to protect assets and ensure financial clarity in the event of divorce.

As a family specialist at national leading law firm Knights, Jane Livingstone has seen first-hand how prenups have evolved from being a niche, often misunderstood concept into a recognised mechanism that can bring clarity and security to relationships.

What is a prenuptial agreement really for?

A prenuptial agreement, commonly known as “prenup”, is effectively signed before marriage, setting out how a couple would regulate or separate finances should the marriage later break down. 

They’re often associated with situations where one spouse has significantly greater wealth, owns a business, expects to inherit or wants to protect a family asset. Increasingly, however, couples with more modest means have started to recognise the value of deciding these matters early rather than leaving everything to chance. 

While the Supreme Court has recently ruled that on divorce, spouses should share the assets they build together, they need not share assets received from their families or inherited, known as non-matrimonial assets. However, such assets can become ‘matrimonialised’, depending on how they’re used during the marriage. A prenup is a useful tool to clarify that certain assets, such as gifts, inheritances, or family wealth, are to remain outside the pool of shared assets, even if circumstances change during the marriage.

Similarly, if a spouse inherits or receives family wealth after the marriage has begun, a postnuptial agreement can serve the same purpose, offering protection and clarity at any stage of the relationship. 

Where the change of heart comes from among younger generations

With many people deciding nowadays to walk down the aisle later in life, they often enter marriages with more established careers and accumulated assets. Many would’ve also witnessed, within family or friends, the financial fallout and emotional strain of divorce, making them more conscious of planning ahead.

Far from being a sign of mistrust, most couples find that talking openly about their finances before marriage brings them closer. As morbid as it may sound, it’s not unlike writing a will: it’s rarely done in expectation of the worst, but to provide clarity and peace of mind.

Are prenups legally binding?

Prenups aren’t automatically legally binding in England and Wales. Courts retain discretion to decide what is fair, especially in cases involving the needs of children.

However, if a prenup is properly prepared – with full financial disclosure, independent legal advice for both parties, and fair, realistic terms – it will carry significant weight. In practice, this often means that a well-drafted prenup does exactly what it’s intended to: reduce conflict and avoid lengthy, expensive and unnecessary disputes. 

Who can benefit and what assets can be covered?

While high-profile examples like Bezos make headlines, prenups are valuable for anyone who wants to protect particular assets, spanning across family businesses, inherited wealth, property purchased before marriage, savings or investments built up independently, and trust funds. 

For business owners, a prenup can be particularly constructive. Without one, divorce can trigger intrusive business valuations, disrupt operations, and create liquidity pressures. Agreeing in advance on how the business will be treated helps protect its stability.

Prenups can also address responsibility for existing debts, ensuring that personal liabilities remain personal rather than becoming joint obligations.

Importantly, these agreements aren’t standard templates – they’re tailored documents, drafted to reflect each couple’s unique circumstances and priorities.

Common misconceptions

One of the most enduring myths is that prenups are only for the very wealthy. The reality is now shaping these agreements differently, as prenups have been increasingly used by couples with moderate wealth who simply seek clarity and fairness. 

Another misconception is that discussing a prenup is cynical or unromantic. In practice, most couples who choose to have these conversations find it reassuring, providing peace of mind and establishing respect for each other’s financial futures, which can hugely reduce anxiety.

How to get it right

The process by which a prenup is created is as important as its content. Some key points:

  • Start early: don’t leave it until weeks before the wedding, but aim to finalise the agreement well in advance, ideally several months before the big day.
  • Full disclosure: both partners must share an honest, detailed picture of their finances. Attempts to withhold disclosure or inaccurately disclose fundamental information could lead to the agreement not being upheld.
  • Independent legal advice: each person should seek separate legal advice to show they understand and freely agree to the terms.
  • Fairness: the agreement must be reasonable and account for both parties’ needs.

If a prenup appears rushed, one-sided or signed under pressure, it’s far less likely to hold up in court.

Keeping it up to date

Life changes, and so should a prenup. It’s sensible to review it every few years or after major events, like the birth of a child or receiving an inheritance. If needed, updates can be formalised to keep the agreement aligned with the couple’s current situation.

Final thoughts

A prenup won’t remove every risk and courts still have a duty to ensure outcomes are fair. But for many couples, it paves the way to a clear plan, agreed together. 

At its best, a prenup isn’t about expecting divorce – it’s about protecting what matters most, reducing future conflict, and entering marriage with openness and confidence. That’s why, stigma aside, more couples are realising that love and pragmatism can go hand in hand.

Read more articles by Knights.

About Fiona Lazenby

Fiona Lazenby is a partner in the family team at Knights. Working with landowners and farming families to entrepreneurs, lottery winners and football club owners, she specialises in helping to negotiate the property and financial repercussions of relationship breakdown as well as resolving disputes over children’s living arrangements and wellbeing. Her high-net-worth clients have assets into the hundreds of million pounds. With expertise in the treatment of assets held in offshore trusts her clients are supported in both the UK and internationally.

She also advises clients on wealth protection when they decide to marry or cohabit, and prepares pre-nuptial, post-nuptial and cohabitation agreements to safeguard inherited wealth or business value created before marriage.

Seeking the best possible outcome for clients underpins her approach and she has often faced national media on their behalf.

She is also a member of the Law Society Family Advanced Panel in respect of complex assets.

About Knights

Knights is one of the fastest-growing legal services businesses in the UK, delivering high-quality services to more than 10,000 business clients from 26 offices nationwide.

Knights is ranked within the top 50 UK law firms by revenue – with specialists in all key areas of corporate, real estate and commercial law. Its extensive expertise is consistently strengthened through its acquisitions and the recruitment of high-calibre talented professionals.

LinkedIn

X

Why a Landmark Ruling Strengthens the Case for Pre-Nups
Photo by Cytonn Photography on Unsplash
/

Why a Landmark Ruling Strengthens the Case for Pre-Nups

Nicki Mitchell
Nicki Mitchell
Partner
Jones Myers

Sponsored post by Jones Myers.

A Supreme Court ruling on whether substantial assets transferred between spouses during marriage should be divided equally on divorce – has reignited the importance of pre-nups. 

The ‘big money case’ saw divorcee Anna Standish lose her legal case to keep almost £80 million which her affluent banker husband had given her in 2017 to put in offshore trusts for their children and to avoid inheritance tax. 

When their marriage fell apart in 2020, the money was still in her name, sparking a bitter, prolonged case which played out in the highest courts in the land.

The outcome is a reminder of the importance of pre-nups for all couples tying the knot, especially for high-net-worth individuals and families involved in estate and inheritance planning. 

Irrespective of a couple’s financial status, a pre-nup helps couples to avoid  the potential distress, acrimony, and expense of disentangling their finances if they split up. 

How to obtain a Pre-nup 

  • To enter into an agreement properly, the couple each need to obtain independent legal advice on the agreement
  • Both must also have disclosed their assets to each other – and the terms of the agreement must produce a result that is fair and reasonable and meets needs
  • The agreement should be negotiated and signed at least 28 days before the wedding. This allows both to obtain advice, have time to consider it, and make an informed decision on signing it

Do courts uphold Pre-nups?

Increasingly courts are upholding pre-nups on divorce if they  are satisfied that the agreement was entered into freely, without undue pressure  and with the benefit of full financial information and independent legal advice.

As the law stands, a court  still needs to approve  the settlement at the point of divorce, ensuring the agreement meets the needs of both parties. If it does not, a different order can be made but this is likely still to take the terms of the Pre-nup into account to some extent.

Are Pre-nups suitable for second marriages? 

Yes. The contracts can  work particularly well for couples marrying for the second time where a husband or wife seeks to retain their own wealth if they separate. They can also protect the interests of children from previous relationships

Taking the time to draw up a pre-nup before marriage can avoid financial and emotional heartache in a marriage breakdown. Jones Myers family law specialists are highly experienced in advising on pre-nups and post-nups. 

For queries on any aspect of family law, call Jones Myers at Leeds 0113 246 0055, Harrogate 01423 276104, or York 01904 202550. Visit www.jonesmyers.co.uk, email info@jonesmyers.co.uk or tweet @helpwithdivorce

Jones Myers blog is ranked 5th in the UK’s Best 25 family law blogs and websites to follow in 2025.

Read more articles by Nicki Mitchell.

Read more articles by Jones Myers.

About Nicki Mitchell

With over three decades of experience in family law, Nicki specialises in the financial aspects of relationship breakdown – and particularly complex cases involving family businesses, multiple properties, and complicated pension arrangements. 

A skilled Mediator, Child Inclusive Mediator and Collaborative Family Lawyer, Nicki champions Alternative Dispute Resolution processes which avoid a lengthy court process and can lead much more quickly and cost effectively to a successful resolution.

Her exceptional track record also includes advising clients on the more traditional methods of resolving issues surrounding family breakdowns. Nicki.mitchell@jonesmyers.co.uk  

How Does the Supreme Court's Judgement in Standish Affect You?
Photo by Sebastian Pichler on Unsplash
/

How Does the Supreme Court’s Judgement in Standish Affect You?

James Pirrie
James Pirrie
Director at
Family Law in Partnership

The short answer is that Standish affects things a bit – but it probably just confirms what a family solicitor would advise you to do anyway.

The longer answer is that highest court of the land has carried out one of its periodic reviews of how to deal with assets at the end of a marriage. Mr and Mrs Standish had considerable assets, much of it built up by Mr Standish before the marriage. They also had a plan to minimise inheritance tax for their children by putting a big slab of Mr Standish’s money in Mrs Standish’s name. When they split, questions were asked:

  1. Did she keep it? 
  2. Was it shared?
  3. Did Mr Standish get it back?

The answer was C.  

Mr Standish got the money back because it was considered to be his separate property and the intention was never that Mrs Standish should benefit from it. There was also enough marital property to meet Mrs Standish’s ongoing needs, such as accommodation and lifestyle. 

Would this be the same if there were more modest assets to share?

If you don’t have such substantial assets, it is less likely to be as simple as dividing marital property (sometimes referred to as the marital pot).  You may need to dip into each spouse’s separate property to meet needs.  Probably the right way now is: 

  1. First, to think carefully about whether an asset is one person’s “separate property”
  2. Secondly consider whether the assets have become shared – and this is all about intention – and now form part of the marital property
  3. Thirdly, you carry out a “needs” assessment, then adjust any division to ensure that children are provided for and that each spouse has a fair start on the road to independent living.

This approach makes clear that there is no simple “split it all 50:50”.

Looking at those 3 elements in turn:

1) Separate property

This is going to include: 

  • What one person owned before the marriage; or
  • What they were given during the marriage, such as an inheritance

This is different from marital property, which is everything built up by or during the relationship.

It is usually possible to clearly identify property/ assets as one or the other – separate or marital.  Although there are still uncertainties, for example where there have been personal injury awards or lottery wins. 

2) Intention to share formerly separate assets

The second stage is all about intention. You don’t just look at whose name an asset is held in, you focus on the intention.  If you went to Court, a Judge would consider “Do the dealings between you show that you intended to convert what was separate into something that was for you both?” If so, the separate assets are matrimonialised, which means they become joint assets and form part of the marital property. As such they are usually (but not inevitably) going to be shared equally.

This might happen over time because:

  • What was separate property is not really so significant after the passage of time, because other assets have built up and the fact that this asset was separately brought in is not such a big deal
  • These monies have been put into joint funds or otherwise scrambled together and over time that shows that they are intended to be relied on by both of you
  • The money has been put into the family home and lived in over a period of time – and what asset is more central to the marriage partnership than that?

There may be other reasons and some situations will be harder to call. For example, what about a pension or even an ISA – these are not assets that you can put in joint names and there may be disagreement over what was said and what was intended during the relationship. 

3) What is the needs assessment?

Needs is a bit like a picnic: you don’t focus so much on who brought what to the picnic, everyone needs to eat and if there is not enough to go around then you work a way to share what there is to make the best of the situation, usually prioritising younger children.

So here the marital property will be shared first, but if necessary the separate assets will also be shared. This can include future income.

What does this mean for the legal process?

Standish is simply telling us to be disciplined and take the steps in sequence to make sure that the right answer is reached.  We need to:

  1. think about whether an asset is really one person’s separate property or marital property; then
  2. consider whether dividing just the marital property will ensure that children are provided for and that each spouse has a fair start towards independent life

And if not:

  1. dip into the separate assets to meet those needs.

Ultimately the decision in Standish is intended to enable a fairer division of assets on divorce, but some things remain less clear. 

For example, imagine Jo who marries Les who has inherited a substantial 3 bed property. Otherwise, their resources are modest, they each earn well and at similar levels. Two years into the relationship, their marriage fails and they decide to divorce. Has the property that Les inherited become part of the marital pot?  What share of it does Jo get?  

If the main home is pretty much always marital property and if marital property is often divided equally, should Jo get half of the home after only 100 weeks of relationship that led to marriage and ended in divorce? We won’t know for sure until the guidance from the Supreme Court is put into practice in the day-to-day cases.

What does this mean for you?

I would suggest that when you are trying to find your solutions, it will almost always be worthwhile getting an “entitlements analysis” carried out by a legal professional.  This will give you a clear indication of what you may each be entitled to and indeed, need, to move forward with your lives. Some of these tests don’t come naturally and unusual situations will generate unusual answers. You are not usually stuck with the analysis, but it will help to know it before you start trying to agree how you are going to go forward: no-one wants to regret their choices years down the road.

Read more articles by James Pirrie.

Read more articles by Family Law in Partnership.

About James Pirrie

James Pirrie is a Director of Family Law in Partnership, a highly regarded law firm based in London, which specialises in de-escalating conflict in family law.  He is an Arbitrator, Family Solicitor and Mediator accredited in child-inclusive mediation.

James is driven to improve long term outcomes for families who are experiencing separation or divorce.  He is credited with introducing collaborative law to the UK and with changing how children’s needs are addressed during family breakdown through the Parenting after Parting initiative. 

Breaking Up is Hard to Do: Separation, Finances and Children for LGBTQ+ Families
Photo by chris robert on Unsplash
///

Breaking Up is Hard to Do: Separation, Finances and Children for LGBTQ+ Families

Joe Ferguson
Joe Ferguson
Family Law Solicitor
Myerson Solicitors

The end of a relationship is never easy, but for LGBTQ+ couples, navigating the legal and emotional aspects of separation can come with distinct challenges. For LGBTQ+ families knowing your rights is vital – particularly if your family has been formed through surrogacy, adoption or other routes that can carry additional legal considerations.

In this article, we explore how separation works for same-sex and LGBTQ+ couples, how financial matters are resolved, and what options are available when children are involved.

Ending the relationship: divorce and civil partnership dissolution

LGBTQ+ couples have had the legal right to marry since 2013 in England and Wales, and civil partnerships continue to be recognised. Both marriage and civil partnerships can be formally ended through the family court – divorce or dissolution, respectively – and the process is now based on a no-fault system. This means that neither party needs to prove wrongdoing for the legal process to begin.

Whether it is a divorce or a dissolution the procedure is the same: an initial application, followed by a conditional order, and finally, a final order to formally end the marriage or civil partnership.

But while the legal framework is the same for all couples, LGBTQ+ individuals may face different questions when it comes to resolving finances and parenting arrangements, particularly when their relationship pre-dated legal recognition.

Financial matters: reaching a fair outcome

Financial settlements can be one of the most emotive and difficult topics to brooch following separation. Like opposite-sex couples, same-sex spouses and civil partners are entitled to a full range of financial remedies. These can include:

  • Lump sum payments
  • Spousal maintenance
  • Property transfers or sales
  • Pension orders
  • A clean break, ending future financial ties

The court will assess the financial resources, needs and contributions of each party amongst other factors, and aims to reach an outcome that is fair and meets the needs of the parties and any children involved.

However, there can be added complexity when considering assets that were acquired before marriage – especially for couples who lived together for many years. Determining whether these assets are “marital” or “non-marital” can become a key issue, particularly where significant property, pensions or savings are involved. Cohabitation alone does not automatically give rise to legal rights, though it is typically taken into account that any period of seamless cohabitation prior to the date of the marriage or civil partnership when determining the length of the marriage. Accordingly, timelines and clear evidence of cohabitation is often required. It should be noted of course that many LGBTQ+ couples were unable to enter into marriage or civil partnership previously owing to the lack of provision within the law for them. Accordingly, these arguments can be important as evidence of the enduring relationship between the parties. 

Children: supporting parenthood in all its forms

For LGBTQ+ families, parenting often involves a range of routes – from adoption and surrogacy to donor conception. These arrangements can create additional legal considerations during a separation.

The starting point is to establish parental responsibility: the legal authority to make decisions about a child’s health, education, and welfare. Biological and adoptive parents usually have parental responsibility automatically, but others (such as non-birth parents in a surrogacy arrangement) may need to apply for parental orders, declarations of parentage or child arrangements orders. 

If both parents are legally recognised, they may choose to agree parenting arrangements voluntarily. Options include:

  • Mediation: This process can help couples reach agreement on how children will be cared for, where they will live, and how contact will work. Mediation is not legally binding but can lead to a more amicable, cost-effective solution.
  • Collaborative law: This process enables separating couples to work together with trained professionals to resolve disputes without going to court. Everyone agrees to work together as a team to resolve disputes without going to court. 
  • Negotiation: working with solicitors, with the benefit of independent legal advice, to work out what would be best for their family, avoiding costly and potentially acrimonious court proceedings.

If agreement cannot be reached, the family court can make a Child Arrangement Order which is legally binding and sets out the child’s living and contact arrangements. The court’s priority is always the child’s welfare.

Planning ahead for a smoother separation

While the legal system provides equality on paper, LGBTQ+ families may still encounter unique issues when relationships end. The reality is that the law in this area is continues to evolve but has not caught up to the social realities of life as an LGBTQ+ person and the unique family dynamics which are increasingly commonplace. The key to navigating these challenges is early advice and a tailored, bespoke approach that reflects the structure of your family, the history of your relationship, and the complexities involved.

If you are an LGBTQ+ individual facing the challenges associated with separation and need assistance, the team at Myerson Solicitors are here to support you with clarity, empathy and practical expertise.

Read more articles by Myerson Solicitors.

About Joe Ferguson

Joe Ferguson is a solicitor in the Family Law team at Myerson Solicitors. He specialises in divorce, financial remedy proceedings, and complex children matters, with particular expertise in supporting LGBTQ+ clients through family law issues with sensitivity and pragmatism.

Thinking About A Prenup? Divorce Solicitor Answers Your Most-Googled Questions
Image by freepik
/

Thinking About A Prenup? Divorce Solicitor Answers Your Most-Googled Questions

Sophia Yau-Rosher
Sophia Yau-Rosher
Director
Beecham Peacock LLP

The celebrity world is abuzz with yet another high-profile divorce case. Billionaire and former record executive, David Geffen, has filed for divorce from his 32-year-old dancer husband, David Armstrong. The marriage only lasted two years, and despite the 82-year-old being worth a reported $8.7 billion, the couple did not sign a prenup.

Although the majority of us won’t have anywhere near as much wealth to protect, it’s important to protect your future, ensuring that your assets remain protected in the event of a divorce. The first three months of 2024 alone saw 27,908 divorce applications, with 21,662 final orders also granted.

With more and more engaged couples entering into marriage with a realistic viewpoint, prenups are becoming more commonplace than ever. The popularity of prenups has risen by 60% in recent years, with postnup agreements seeing an increase of nearly 185%.

If you – like 31% of couples who now have a prenup – are anxious around the concept of tying your assets to your relationship, you will likely have some questions. Expert divorce solicitor Sophia Yau-Rosher – from Newcastle-based divorce solicitors Beecham Peacock – answers the top ten most-Googled prenup questions per month, helping you stay informed ahead of your marriage.

1. What is a prenup?

“Put simply, a prenup is a legal document that two parties agree to before they marry, or enter a civil partnership,” Yau-Rosher explains.

“The document sets out the financial responsibilities of both parties and allows for the protection of certain assets, including property, investments, inheritance and more in the event of a divorce. It also outlines which party is responsible for specific debts and other financial issues, should the marriage or civil partnership come to an end.

“A prenup can provide protection and offer clarity for both parties in the event of a difficult or contentious divorce.”

2. Can you change a prenup?

“Ahead of your marriage, you can make as many changes to your prenup as you like,” Yau-Rosher assures. “As long as both parties have sought independent legal advice and feel comfortable with the changes, there is no reason why amendments cannot be made to the document before it is signed.

“However, after you are legally married, you cannot change or modify your prenuptial agreement. If your financial or emotional circumstances change during the course of your marriage and the prenup is no longer relevant, you can consider a postnuptial agreement – or postnup – which carries the same kind of legal weighting.”

3. Are prenups legal in the UK?

“Your prenup is not legally binding in either England or Wales. A court will not automatically enforce the terms of your prenup in the event of a divorce. However, a prenup that both parties have freely entered into will likely add weight to any court arrangements.

“If both parties concerned have disclosed their full financial situations and received independent legal advice pertaining to the prenup, the court will usually give considerable legal weight to the agreement during any financial disputes.”

4. What does a prenup do?

“Essentially, a prenup safeguards any assets that you or your partner bring to the marriage, protecting your interests in the event of a divorce. It also deals with the financial impact of any inheritance, dependents – such as current or future children – and any shifts in earning potential.

“Your prenuptial agreement provides you and any children from previous relationships with financial reassurance in the case of divorce,” Yau-Rosher explains. “It is not a sign that either party is unsure about the marriage, but rather a sensible step in future financial planning.”

5. Can you write your own prenup in the UK?

“As prenuptial agreements are not legally binding documents, you can pen your own in the UK. However, in order for the court to take your prenup seriously in the event of a divorce, it needs to be prepared in a specific way.

“I always advise my clients to seek professional legal assistance in drafting their prenup, as DIY agreements often don’t stand up in court,” Yau-Rosher counsels. “This way, you can ensure that the document is put together in a way that will protect and benefit both parties, if it is required in the future.”

6. What cannot be included in a prenup UK?

“There are a number of strict rules regarding what can and cannot be included in a prenuptial agreement in the UK. If these rules are not obeyed, it could lead to your prenup losing all legal weight in court.

“Your prenup should not include any personal or lifestyle issues, references to child support, visitation rights or child custody, or discussion of matters that could be deemed ‘unfair’ for one or both parties. A family law solicitor can help you draft a prenup that adheres to these rules.”

7. How much does a prenup cost?

“The cost of a prenup varies, but the majority of professional solicitors in the UK will charge £2,000–£5,000. The more complex your financial situation and the larger your wealth, the more your prenuptial agreement is likely to cost.” Yau-Rosher explains.

8. How do I get a prenup?

“The first step in securing a prenup is always to seek professional legal advice from a family law specialist. Both parties should seek their own independent legal counsel. You will then be required to provide your chosen solicitor with a full run-down of your current financial situation, along with any information about debts, income and inherited wealth. The solicitor can then draft the document.

“Once both parties are satisfied, the prenuptial agreement can be signed in the presence of the solicitors and independent witnesses. Ideally, the prenup should be signed at least 28 days prior to the signing of your marriage or civil partnership certificate.”

9. Can you cancel a prenup?

“Cancelling a prenup is a complex process, but can be achieved under specific circumstances. For example, if the prenup is deemed unconscionable at the time of signing, due to a lack of legal advice or due to one party being under pressure or duress to sign.

“If you can prove that your partner has committed fraud or deliberately misrepresented their finances, this constitutes another reason for cancellation of the prenup,” Yau-Rosher says. “A prenup may also be deemed invalid if the financial situation of one or both parties has changed significantly, making the original agreement unfair.”

10. What is a postnuptial agreement?

“A postnuptial agreement is very similar to a prenuptial agreement, aside from the fact that it is drafted and signed after the marriage or civil partnership, rather than before.

“You can opt for a postnup instead of a prenup, or mutually agree to replace the original agreement with a postnup if your or your partner’s financial situation changes significantly after you marry or enter into a civil partnership.

“Due process must still be followed and both parties must still seek independent legal advice to ensure that the postnup holds a similar legal weighting to a prenup if required in court.”

“If you are considering entering into a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, seeking independent legal advice is always the best first step. Communicate your intentions and any concerns with your partner to ensure that you both enter the agreement with shared goals and a realistic outlook when it comes to your finances.”

Read more articles by Beecham Peacock Solicitors.

About Sophia Yau-Rosher

Sophia Yau-Rosher is a Director at Beecham Peacock Solicitors. Beecham Peacock Solicitors are a trusted divorce solicitors based in Newcastle Upon Tyne, and they know how important it is for your divorce settlement to be treated with the utmost respect and care.

They have countless experiences handling intricate divorce proceedings, so they understand that the process needs to be quick, smooth and respectful for both parties involved.

If you are getting a divorce, ending your civil partnership or even just agreeing to the terms of a separation, their talented divorce lawyers will make sure you are supplied with the most current and prudent advice to deal with the money, assets and property belonging to both parties.

Understanding Parental Rights in the UK
Image by rawpixel.com on Freepik
/

Understanding Parental Rights in the UK

Akwal Ryatt
Akwal Ryatt
Head of Family Law
Tyler Hoffman Solicitors

Getting divorced can be complicated for couples with children, as decisions must be made regarding where each child lives, how much time they spend with each parent, and other aspects of their care. The matter of parental rights may also come into question, particularly if the parents were not married when the child was born. A father may not automatically have parental responsibility for a child under these circumstances, which can affect their rights during divorce proceedings.

There are important legal and procedural steps that parents should take during divorce proceedings to preserve their role in their child’s life, and to maintain the ability to make decisions about their care, their living arrangements and other important aspects of their life. These rights do not automatically change due to divorce, but the court may become involved if there is a dispute about how they are exercised, and it is important to protect yourself.

Here, the experienced divorce solicitors at Tyler Hoffman explain how parental responsibility is established, how it affects the rights of each parent during a divorce and how to secure a Child Arrangements Order.

What is parental responsibility?

‘Parental responsibility’ refers to the legal rights, duties, powers and authority a parent has for a child. It includes the right to make decisions about education, religion, medical treatment and day-to-day care. A child’s birth mother will have parental responsibility automatically, and any Parental Responsibility Orders issued by the court will name any other people who have a say in these decisions.

A father’s legal rights generally depend on whether he has parental responsibility, which can be crucial when making child arrangements during the divorce process. A father automatically has parental responsibility if he was married to the child’s mother at the time of birth or subsequently, or if he is listed on the birth certificate (for children born after 1 December 2003 in England and Wales). You should speak to experienced paternity lawyers about whether you have parental responsibility if you have any concerns. Adoptive or foster parents may also have this responsibility, although it can be worthwhile to confirm this with a solicitor.

If either party does not have parental responsibility, they apply to the court for it using a Parental Responsibility Order or by entering into a Parental Responsibility Agreement with the child’s birth mother.

What is the role of a Child Arrangements Order?

A Child Arrangements Order is a legally binding court order that outlines how a child’s care will be structured following a divorce or separation. It becomes necessary if parents cannot reach an informal agreement (such as a Parenting Plan) about how child care arrangements will be managed. The order offers a legally binding decision on:

  • Residency: where and with whom the child will live
  • Contact: when and how they see the other parent
  • Whether a shared care arrangement is appropriate.

Either parent can apply to the court to put an order in place, and guardians or others with parental responsibility may also be able to apply, although certain parties will need permission from the court before they can apply for a Child Arrangements Order.

You may also need to attend a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting (MIAM) before the family court will consider a Child Arrangements Order. A MIAM is an opportunity to resolve the issue without involving the court, and can help the parties in a divorce to reach an informal resolution. However, if mediation doesn’t work or is not suitable, either parent can apply to the family court for a Child Arrangements Order.

This will usually result in court hearings where a judge can review evidence from both parties and make a decision on final arrangements. An officer from the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service may conduct safeguarding checks and recommend arrangements based on the child’s welfare. The court makes decisions based on what it believes will be best for the child, including their wishes and feelings, the impact of any changes in circumstances and which parent is most able to meet their practical, emotional and educational needs.

Parents can also apply for a Specific Issue Order to resolve a particular dispute, or a Prohibited Steps Order to prevent the other parent from taking certain actions without permission. This is often used in cases where one parent decides to relocate, or if there is a dispute about schooling.

What does a Child Arrangements Order mean for parental rights?

Unlike an informal agreement, a Child Arrangements Order can be enforced by the court, which gives parents a degree of additional protection and ensures that the agreement remains in place. If one parent breaches the order, the other can apply to the court to enforce it. In response, the court can impose penalties, including warnings, enforcement orders (including unpaid work orders) and the need to pay compensation for financial losses.

While there is a risk in letting the court decide, courts generally support regular, meaningful contact with both parents unless there is clear evidence that such contact would harm the child. Speak to an experienced family law solicitor for guidance on navigating this process, and make sure to keep records of all contact and communication with other parties involved in the divorce to give yourself the best chance of a favourable outcome from any legal process.

About Akwal Ryatt

Akwal Ryatt is the head of Family Law at Tyler Hoffman Solicitors, and is an accomplished Chartered Legal Executive with an extensive career spanning over 28 years. With a compassionate approach, Akwal is characterised by her profound expertise in family law areas including divorce, separations, Child Arrangement Orders, Financial Remedy Orders and more.

Pension Sharing Orders: What You Need to Know
Image by freepik
/

Pension Sharing Orders: What You Need to Know

Peter Marples
Peter Marples
Editor at The Divorce Magazine
Director at Fair Result

Sponsored post by Fair Result.

Why a Pension Matters in Divorce

Only 13% of divorcees consider pensions when dividing assets. Pensions are often the second biggest asset after the home – but often ignored at your peril to protect you in later life.

Pensions represent a critical part of financial security, particularly in later life. Yet, during the tumultuous process of divorce, they are frequently overlooked. This can lead to significant financial disadvantages for one or both parties. Understanding the importance of pensions and the mechanisms available for sharing them is essential for anyone going through a divorce or dissolution of a civil partnership.

What is a Pension Sharing Order?

A Pension Sharing Order (PSO) is a legal order that allows for the division of pension assets between divorcing spouses or civil partners. This order ensures a fair distribution of pension benefits, providing financial security to both parties. It is often described as equalisation of income in retirement, and this is what the courts try to achieve when looking at pension distribution even when only one party has a significant pension. A report is often required from a pension expert to forecast how dividing a pension between parties will result in the equalisation of income for the later years.

When a PSO is granted, a specified percentage of one party’s pension is transferred to the other party. This division is legally binding and can be enforced by the court, ensuring that the agreed-upon split is executed. The transferred pension benefits can either be directed into a new pension scheme for the receiving party or remain within the original scheme with the benefits reallocated.

Pension Sharing vs. Other Options

While a Pension Sharing Order is a common and often preferred method for dividing pension assets, there are other alternatives, such as offsetting and pension attachment orders.

Offsetting: This involves balancing the value of the pension against other assets. For example, one party may keep the pension while the other party receives a larger share of the property or other financial assets. This is effectively simply dividing the overall assets at the time of divorce to achieve equalisation at that point – with the courts often accepting house values and pension values rise at roughly the same rate.

Pension Attachment Orders: This method, also known as earmarking, directs a portion of the pension benefits to the ex-spouse when they are paid out. However, this does not transfer ownership and can be less flexible and reliable than a PSO. Often not a common approach taken by the courts.

PSOs are often favoured because they provide a clean break and clear division of pension assets, ensuring that both parties have financial independence post-divorce.

Who Can Apply & When

PSOs are available to individuals undergoing divorce or dissolution of a civil partnership. It is important to note that these orders are not automatic and must either be agreed upon by both parties or ordered by the court. The division of the pension will clearly be set out in the financial consent order and a pension sharing annex attached to the consent order will also be approved by the court. This must be sent to the pension company dealing with the distribution within 4 months of the consent order being approved by the court.

Eligibility conditions include:

  • The parties must be legally divorcing or dissolving a civil partnership.
  • Both parties must agree to the order, or it must be mandated by the court.

How the Process Works

The process of obtaining a PSO involves several steps and can be complex. Here is a simplified timeline:

Step 1: Obtain a pension valuation. This requires contacting the pension provider to evaluate the current worth of the pension. This is commonly referred to as obtaining the CETV value of the pension (Cash Equivalent Transfer Value)

Step 2: Legal paperwork and court involvement. Solicitors and sometimes actuaries and pension experts will be involved in drafting and submitting the necessary documents to the court.

Step 3: The court grants the Pension Sharing Order. Once the court approves the order, the pension provider is instructed to execute the division of assets.

What Happens After the Order is Made?

Once a PSO is granted, its implementation begins:

  • Percentage-based transfer: The agreed-upon percentage of the pension is either transferred to the receiving party’s new pension scheme or reallocated within the current scheme.
  • Internal transfer: In some cases, the benefits remain within the original scheme but are adjusted to reflect the new ownership division.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid in Pension Sharing Orders

Navigating the division of pensions can be fraught with challenges. Here are some common pitfalls to avoid:

  • Not valuing the pension correctly: Obtaining an accurate valuation is crucial for a fair division.
  • Agreeing to a split without legal or financial advice: Professional guidance ensures that your interests are protected.
  • Failing to account for future needs: Consider long-term financial security when dividing assets.
  • Also consider the scheme rules for each pension and find out what happens if you die before you receive the pension – can it be distributed as part of your estate or do the scheme rules not allow for this. Very common in some public sector pensions.

Fair Result’s Approach

At Fair Result, we support our clients through the process of obtaining a Pension Sharing Order with expert financial advice and clear communication.

  • Access to financial experts who can provide accurate pension valuations and strategic advice.
  • WhatsApp contact for convenient and timely communications.
  • Fixed-fee model ensuring financial clarity from day one.

Conclusion

In conclusion, pensions should be a part of every divorce conversation. Their importance to financial security in later life cannot be overstated. Ensuring a fair division through a Pension Sharing Order can provide peace of mind and stability for both parties involved.

Download our Divorce Guide or get in touch for a free consultation to explore how we can assist you in protecting your financial future.

Read more articles by Peter Marples.

About Peter Marples

Peter Marples – Director of Fair Result and qualified accountant, with the determination to change the way divorce is transacted. For further advice on financial settlements and navigating divorce, use the contact details below:

  • Email
  • Give the team a call – 07500933818 or 0333 577 7009
  • Complete an enquiry form
Common Financial Mistakes to Avoid During and After Divorce
Photo by Nick Fewings on Unsplash
/

Common Financial Mistakes to Avoid During and After Divorce

Nicki Mitchell
Nicki Mitchell
Partner
Jones Myers

Sponsored post by Jones Myers.

The fear of starting all over again and all the financial worry that can bring with it can understandably have a profound effect on many people going through divorce or separation.

This fear can be particularly acute for those who have not had to deal with financial practicalities such as tax, standing orders and direct debits during their relationship.

If you are going through divorce or contemplating it and are concerned about future finances, this article will help to keep you on the right financial track throughout your divorce and beyond.

Be Open and Honest

Not sharing financial information during a relationship can contribute to problems during divorce proceedings.

One spouse may have no idea where the budget line is – or even where it should be drawn – and may have unrealistic expectations of what they are entitled to, or what is a realistic and affordable.

One spouse may have hidden savings or income from the other or scrutinised the other’s spending without being transparent about their own. On divorce, there is nowhere to hide. It is fundamental that both spouses fully and frankly disclose everything they have to each other as a starting point for an informed negotiation.

The Importance of Financial Disclosure

In every divorce, separating couples must provide to the other full details of their assets, income, pension and liabilities.   This is known as financial disclosure.

Financial disclosure ensures that both spouses can make fully informed decisions about what they consider to be a fair settlement. A failure to disclose anything material to the settlement can in some cases lead to an agreement being set aside. Lawyers and judges know every trick in the book and will ask questions if they suspect that money has been concealed. They may even employ forensic accountants to track down missing assets.

Don’t be tempted to hide money in offshore banks. These still have to be disclosed.  If you do not provide everything that is necessary to understand the financial position, family courts have the power to question your accountant, your financial advisor and even your bank manager.

Setting up a new business shortly before separation may well be seen as suspicious or even a deliberate attempt to hide assets.  Taking steps designed to put money beyond the reach of your spouse could lead to injunctions being made against you, freezing assets, or ordering the return of monies from third parties.  In the long run, actions such as these are highly unlikely to succeed and will almost certainly damage your credibility in the eyes of the court.

The Penalties of Concealing Assets

If it later comes to light that you have withheld material financial information during the financial disclosure process, your spouse might be able to ask the court to set aside the Financial Consent Order and relook at what would be a fair order – taking into account all the assets, including those not previously disclosed.

The court can also make an order that you pay your ex’s legal costs. In the worst-case scenario, deliberately withholding financial information in breach of a court order can amount to a contempt of court for which a range of penalties (including ultimately imprisonment) could be imposed.

Include Pensions in Financial Settlements

Frequently overlooked in financial settlements, pensions are frequently one of the most valuable assets of a marriage. They often make up the second highest- value asset in a divorce settlement after the family home – or sometimes the highest.

It is key that information about pensions is made available in the financial disclosure process which must include details of all pensions, including state pensions – and the value of each one.

The most common way in which a disparity in pensions is addressed in a divorce settlement is pension sharing.  Pension sharing splits the pensions immediately and provides a clean break

As an alternative, in some cases ex-spouses prefer to take a greater share of the equity in the family home or other capital, as a trade-off for a share of the other’s pension.

Some divorces may involve several pension arrangements so it is important to consider which arrangements should be shared, and to what extent.  Pensions are complex and, save in very straightforward cases with pensions of limited value, it is important to get specialist advice about them before agreeing a settlement.

The pension share may be internal (when the recipient becomes a member of the scheme) or external when the share must be invested in an existing or new arrangement of the receiving party. Care should be taken to obtain details of the cost of any transfer.

In deciding what is best for them, the couple need to consider how their respective financial needs will be met and what other assets are available for distribution.

Consider Financial Planning

It can be helpful to have financial advice during settlement negotiations.  Many financial advisers use cashflow modelling, which can be a valuable way of how different settlement options might pan out in the future. In processes such as collaborative practice or mediation, it is quite common to bring a financial adviser into the process as a neutral to help the discussions.  Further financial advice can then be taken on an individual basis when settlement terms are clear.

Get a formal Financial Order

Once a financial settlement is agreed, it is almost always best for the terms agreed to be made final and binding in a court order. This is a legally binding document which details the main assets owned by divorcing couples and sets out the financial arrangements agreed between them. The terms of an order are binding and can be enforced through the courts if there are any problems putting those terms into effect.

It is important to understand that the divorce process itself does not dismiss financial claims which  can be pursued many years after the divorce has been finalised provided the person bringing the application has not remarried. Putting off the conversation at the time of separation can sometimes just be kicking the can down the road.

Try to avoid exceeding your budget

I am not a financial adviser, but these are some pointers which might be useful to think about:

  1. Create a ‘to do’ list of all things financial (bills etc) and an aspirational list to set goals for enjoyable things such as treats and breaks
  2. Consider having two bank accounts – one for day-to-day expenses for the house, food, car and associated expenses, direct debits, standing orders and credit card payment. The second is for setting aside some savings for exceptional expenses such non-essential clothing, holidays, and house repairs.
  3. Set out the absolute and exact payments needed every month for your house and family
  4. Know when your maintenance payments arrive and budget accordingly. Ensure standing orders don’t go out before your monthly payments are due in
  5. Apply to your Council for a 25% council tax discount. The concession applies if you are on your own or have younger children
  6. Expand your support network if you’re on your own or have children. Now is an ideal time as the country emerges from lockdown
  7. Take professional advice on preparing and budgeting for your own retirement
  8. Make a will. If you have a pension or life assurance, ensure it includes your chosen beneficiaries and is updated. Review it every few years.
  9. Stay healthy in body and spirit – try new things. You could also consider engaging a life or Divorce coach who specialises in helping people in your situation prepare for their new future

Spousal Maintenance and Child Maintenance

Remember that Spousal Maintenance will usually be paid for a period of time to enable you to adjust to financial independence or when your financial needs are reduced, for example, when your children finish school or university, or leave home.

Be aware that your spousal maintenance will stop if you remarry or enter into a civil partnership or if either of you dies. It could also be affected if you meet a new partner and move in together

It is also important to plan for when child maintenance – which is mandatory for both parents for children under sixteen and youngsters under twenty who are still in full time education – comes to an end.

As part of our holistic approach, Jones Myers advises and guides our clients through the stages of divorce during and after their divorce.

A champion of non-confrontational divorce and resolving issues in a spirit of collaboration and cooperation, our extensive expertise includes alternative to avoid courts which include mediation and collaborative family law.

Our pre-divorce and post- divorce support includes helping them to stay on the right financial track as they embark on the next chapter of their lives.

Read more articles by Nicki Mitchell.

About Nicki Mitchell

With extensive experience in family law, Nicki specialises in the financial aspects of relationship breakdown – and particularly complex cases involving family businesses, multiple properties, and complicated pension arrangements.

A skilled Mediator, Child Inclusive Mediator and Collaborative Family Lawyer, Nicki champions Alternative Dispute Resolution processes which avoid a lengthy court process and can lead much more quickly and cost effectively to a successful resolution.

Her exceptional track record also includes advising clients on the more traditional methods of resolving issues surrounding family breakdowns.

Direct Dial: 01904 202553 or email  Nicki.mitchell@jonesmyers.co.uk. Website: www.jonesmyers.co.uk

No-Fault Divorce Doesn’t End Everything: Why You Still Need a Financial Consent Order
Image by freepik
///

No-Fault Divorce Doesn’t End Everything: Why You Still Need a Financial Consent Order

Sarah Hawkins
Sarah Hawkins
CEO
National Family Mediation (NFM)

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

When no-fault divorce came into effect in England and Wales in April 2022, it was seen as a much-needed shift toward a more respectful, less confrontational way to end a marriage. And for many couples, it has delivered on that promise—removing blame and encouraging a more constructive path forward.

But here’s the catch: while the legal end of a marriage is now simpler, financial separation is often left unresolved. This misunderstanding can lead to serious complications down the line.

The Common Misconception: Thinking Everything’s Already Settled

With the ability to complete a divorce online in just a few steps, it’s easy to assume that everything—money, property, pensions—is automatically taken care of, especially when the split is amicable.

It’s not.

“A divorce legally ends a marriage, but it doesn’t end the financial relationship between ex-spouses.” – Sarah Hawkins, CEO, NFM

Unless you obtain a court-approved financial consent order, either party can make financial claims in the future—even years after the divorce is finalised.

What Happens Without a Financial Consent Order?

At NFM, we regularly see people return to mediation long after their divorce, unaware that their financial ties were never legally closed. The consequences can be significant:

  • A house purchase falls through when a buyer realises their ex could still have a claim on the equity.
  • Retirement plans are disrupted by surprise claims on pensions
  • Second marriages become legally complicated due to unresolved financial obligations

Without a consent order, your financial past may unexpectedly resurface.

What Is a Financial Consent Order?

A financial consent order is a legal document that formalises the financial arrangements you’ve agreed with your ex. Once approved by a judge, it becomes legally binding and prevents either party from making further financial claims.

You don’t need to go to court in person to get one—but you do need to go through the right process. And while it’s often associated with disputes, it’s just as important when both parties are in full agreement.

Making It Legal: Your Options for Getting a Consent Order

Mediation is often the best starting point, especially for couples who want to avoid unnecessary conflict or legal costs. It helps both parties reach a fair agreement in a calm, structured setting.

Once an agreement is reached, there are several ways to make it legally binding:

  • Do it yourself – If you agree on everything and feel confident managing the paperwork, you can draft your own consent order and apply to the court for approval. Guidance is available on the GOV.UK website.
  • Get legal advice – A solicitor can review or help draft the order to ensure it’s fair and likely to be accepted by the court. Judges can reject a consent order if they suspect one party may have been disadvantaged.
  • Use a solicitor service – At NFM, we offer NFM LegalEyes, a service that connects clients with qualified solicitors who can prepare the consent order – leaving you just needing to submit to Court.

How NFM LegalEyes Works:

  1. You agree on how to divide finances through mediation.
  2. A solicitor drafts the consent order and completes the required paperwork.
  3. You submit the consent order
  4. If the judge finds it fair, the order is granted—and your financial arrangements are legally finalised.

Help with Costs: Legal Aid and the Mediation Voucher Scheme

Worried about costs? Support is available.

  • Legal Aid is still available for family mediation for those who qualify.
  • The government’s Family Mediation Voucher Scheme offers up to £500 toward mediation costs for separating families with children.

These schemes make it easier for families to access professional help early—often avoiding more expensive issues later on.

Why Mediation Still Matters—Even with No-Fault Divorce

Some assume that because no-fault divorce removes the need to assign blame, mediation is less important. The opposite is often true.

Mediation:

  • Encourages calm, cooperative conversations
  • Helps you focus on what’s best for your children
  • Reduces long-term legal and financial risks
  • Leads to more sustainable, tailored agreements

“Most people going through divorce simply want to move on—securely and with dignity. That means more than ending a marriage; it means drawing a clear legal line under the relationship.” – Sarah Hawkins

Final Thoughts: Don’t Leave Loose Ends

No-fault divorce has simplified one part of the process. But it’s just as important to bring financial clarity and closure to your separation.

If you’ve already divorced without a financial consent order, it’s not too late—you can still apply for one. If you’re just starting out, make sure it’s part of your plan.

Ending a marriage should include ending financial ties—formally, fairly, and for good.

About Sarah Hawkins

Sarah Hawkins is the CEO of National Family Mediation (NFM), the largest provider of family mediation services in England and Wales. A passionate advocate for conflict resolution and family wellbeing, Sarah has over 20 years of experience helping families navigate the emotional and legal challenges of separation and divorce.

📍 www.nfm.org.uk | 📧 info@nfm.org.uk | 📱 @FamilyMediationNFM

1 2 3 4 8