helping children cope with divorce - Page 3

What is Parental Alienation? – A Deep Dive into Complex Family Relationships
Thumbnail for the YouTube video "What is Parental Alienation? - TDM Expert Interviews (EP. 4) - Dr Amy Baker"
//

What is Parental Alienation? – A Deep Dive into Complex Family Relationships

Dr Amy J.L. Baker
Dr Amy J.L. Baker
Parental Alienation Researcher, Expert, Author, Coach

Join us as we speak to Dr Amy J.L. Baker, international expert in parental alienation and parent-child relationships, as we delve into the world of parental alienation. In this insightful interview, Amy uncovers everything you need to know about parental alienation and the importance of maintaining a loving relationship, despite the hatred from the alienated child.

Discover what parental alienation really means, how it is manifested, why it occurs and practical advice to help you cope if you find yourself victim of parental alienation.

Read on for the full transcript of our video, “What is Parental Alienation?”

[Music]

Hi Dr Amy um, Dr Amy J.L. Baker that’s your website so if anybody wants to try and find you they will, they will be able to get you on that website but I’ll repeat it again at some point so that those who might have missed it will get it. So thank you so much for agreeing to, uh interview request for The Divorce Magazine which is if anybody doesn’t know who’s listening The Divorce Magazine is an online magazine in the UK, that covers all matters divorce, um from children, families, parents, finances, mortgages, pensions, all kinds of issues that um, that come with divorce and we only ever have experts and professionals in divorce, who we feature their content in terms of articles, interviews like in this, this um instance where we have Amy.

So Amy I’ll, I’ll introduce you if I miss anything just let me know okay? All right, so I went on your website although I mean I knew about you way before but today I went on your website, and it started off by saying that you’re are “nationally recognised” and I thought nationally? I think internationally because I’m in London and I can’t be the only one in London who knows about you, so I will introduce you by saying you’re an internationally recognised expert in parental alienation, um in parent-child relationships, and in children of divorce and those who have experienced emotional abuse as children, uh or in childhood.

And Amy is also the author of 10 books, um and also you have 120 academic papers published which is quite impressive. I’m yet to do my first one so you know that’s, that’s quite impressive and all this is to do with um the wellbeing of children, um so yeah so that’s, that’s really quite an extensive work piece of not piece, pieces of work that you have done over the years um. I also saw on your website that you do offer coaching and your coaching is very solution based / focused and goal-oriented um, to parents assuming parents who are experiencing or who have experienced parental alienation.

Have I missed out anything Amy? That’s all the good stuff. Okay, alright and just again Amy’s website is amyjlbaker.com.

How did you get into the world of parental alienation?

So before we get into the whole world of Parental Alienation, what brought you to the world of parental alienation? How did you get there?

It’s really just another facet of what I’m interested in which is distorted parent child relationships and I’ve looked at that from many different perspectives. And, I didn’t really anticipate when I did my first book, so I started that research in 2005 for the first book which came out in 2007, I didn’t really realise how it was going to take over my life, it was just another piece of work that I did but I went to I, it, you know the work was sort of big enough that it turned into a book and then I went to my first book talk, and, people were like clutching my book. And one woman came up to me and said something like you know, “page 153 saved my life”. It was so touching and you know as a researcher most of the time you do a study, you write it up, it ends up in a journal other researchers if you’re lucky are reading it and building on it but this, work that I’ve done has a, consumer based sort of people hungry to learn more targeted parents are so, um, dedicated to educating themselves and understanding what’s happening. And so, they sort of in a way demanded it but in a good sense that I continue to do this work.

So I felt like I’m, you know every time I give a talk, a book talk or a workshop or whatever people come up to me “well have you looked at this”, “have you looked at that” and so it’s sort of one thing just kind of builds on another so, I didn’t have a particular reason why I got into it, but then once I did I just sort of stayed in this world and spend about half my time every week, thinking about and working on parental alienation in one way or another. Yeah, yeah, and you’re right actually from my experience of working with parents who are experiencing parental alienation, the need to know more and the need to educate themselves is actually quite strong I had not put that link together but yeah.

What is parental alienation?

So what is parental alienation? Well, the sort of a working definition is that it’s a family dynamic in which one parent fosters in the child an unjustified rejection of, of the other parent so the premise, built into that definition is that, some kids reject a parent, and when they do, it could be alienation that they’ve been kind of put up to it by the other parent but it doesn’t have to be.

It could be that the parent they’re rejecting, is so suboptimal or outright abusive, or neglectful that the child has a legitimate reason to reject that parent and that’s what we call ‘estrangement’. So we reserve the term ‘alienation’ for when the child’s been manipulated and to be clear, the parent engaging in the manipulation doesn’t have to be doing it consciously. Right, they so it doesn’t have to be “I’m going to turn the children against you” it just could be they’re engaging in these behaviours that, foster and the child the false belief, that the other parent is unsafe, unloving, and unavailable.

How can you tell when it’s parental alienation? How does it manifest itself?

Right, okay and so you’ve talked about estrangement, you’ve talked about parental alienation, and I don’t want to go into what the big main difference is um, but I’m just thinking how can you tell when it’s parental alienation? How does it manifest itself? So that’s a great question because, um, it is really important to get that right because the, the interventions, the court interventions, the mental health interventions would be very different.

If the child’s rejecting a parent who beat them, or abandoned them, or molested them, we would hold the rejected parent to a very high standard before they could have access to their child again and the treatment would involve that parent sort of atoning for their bad behaviour and helping the child know that it’s not their fault Etc. But when it’s alienation, the treatment is very different it’s really about correcting the child’s distortions. Like you would perceive that parent as unsafe, unloving, and unavailable when they’re actually not. So it is very, very important to get it right, is it alienation or is it estrangement.

And because that’s so important we put a lot of thought into this in the field and we’ve created, what used to be called the Five Factor Model but for a couple of reasons we’re now calling it “The Baker Model” and according, for me, uh, The Baker Model um, specifies that five things need to be present in order to say that a child who’s rejecting a parent is alienated, as opposed to estranged. Right. So the five things are:

The first factor and the, The Baker Model which used to be called Five Factor Model I’m going to call them factors, the first factor is that there is actually a breach in the relationship. So you’re not even going to wonder is it alienation or estrangement unless there’s a breach in the relationship and the child is very disaffected from a parent. That’s, pretty much the one factor that everybody agrees on. The favoured parent and the rejected parent both agree yep there’s a problem here this kid is very hurt, angry, rejecting, and distant from one parent.

The second factor, is that there was a prior positive relationship between the child and the parent whom the child is now rejecting. That means that their normative parenting flaws, you know, are not so well, the parenting flaws are not so egregious that they would cause a child to reject them. they’re just a regular parent who’s put in their time, and love, and affection into the relationship, there was a solid foundation at some point. And this prevents people, I’ve had actually cases where somebody was gone for like 10 years and then they come back and the child rejects them, and it’s like, no that’s not necessarily alienation like you abandon your child, you haven’t been there you haven’t, you didn’t have a relationship, so you can’t claim it’s alienation there has to have been a relationship that was disrupted to say that it’s alienation.

Factor three is that the rejected parent has not abused or neglected the child, so absence of abuse or neglect. It’s possible you could have been a pretty good parent and then you engaged in some kind of abuse and now your child’s rejecting you, that would rule out alienation. So to be clear, if there’s evidence of abuse, it cannot be alienation. Just we never want to say that an abused child is an alienated child.

Factor four, is evidence not supposition, not guessing, not inference, evidence that the favoured parent has engaged in multiple, no specific number, multiple, of the 17 Primary Parental Alienation Strategies. These are the behaviours that research shows can induce in a child the false belief, that, a parent is unsafe, unloving, and unavailable when that is not the case.

And then the final factor is that the child is exhibiting the “8 Behavioural Manifestations of Alienation” and these, I’m, I could go into them if you want but they’re also readily available in line for anybody who just Googles “The 8 Behavioural Manifestations of Alienation”. And it’s not, rejecting the parent because that’s already embedded in the model, eight other behaviours, and the interesting thing about those behaviours is, we now have research that demonstrates that even kids who have been abused, severely, physically, abused by a parent do not exhibit these eight behaviours towards that abusive parent. These behaviours are really unique and specific to alienated kids.

Can you give us just, if not eight of them just, which ones you would um, just any of them the a, um, well the campaign of denigration that’s the first one, and I have to say the names are somewhat confusing, or not necessarily as clear like ‘what’s the campaign of denigration?’ but what it basically means is that the child is over the top negative, towards the rejected parent. Gleefully telling everybody that’s the campaign part, “my mother’s a whore”, “my father’s a monster”, just like, absolutely willing to announce to the world, um, how horrible and disgusting. And this is very different than abuse kids, who it really takes them a long time to even admit that a parent’s abusive and they’re still protective of that parent and they, generally feel like it’s their fault that the parent abused them so they’re not so happy to let other people know that they’ve been abused.

But also within the campaign of denigration, involves, denying any past positive relationship. So if you take a kid who’s actually been abused and you say “tell me something fun you did with mom, when you were younger” the kid can readily, think of fun things but alienated kids, whose parent didn’t actually even abuse them, will say “I can’t think of anything good that parent did, nothing comes to mind” and even if you, this is true if you show them a picture, of themselves looking like they’re having a good time they will say either “that’s not me”, or “well I was only smiling because my father said he would beat me up if I, you know if I didn’t smile for the camera” so it’s like again abused kids can say “yeah, you know before Mom you know, went on crack” or “before dad started doing this” or this they were pretty good and we did have fun times, only alienated kids will say nothing good about that parent.

So that’s just one, example of the 8 Behavioural Manifestation. Yeah, so they will deny any, any have happy memories and I’m assuming that the, abused child might also, the difference might be that they might be holding on to those good memories, somewhere as opposed to denying them and forgetting about them. I did a, one of my research studies was actually, um, working with a group of kids who were alienated versus kids just in a regular divorce situation and we gave them a paper and pencil measure they were, teenagers, and you know tell me one good memory you had of each parent duh, duh, duh, duh, duh, and not only did the alienated kids say like “I don’t have any good memories” but they would literally write in caps like “nothing” with 13 exclamation points I mean they are so, focussed on, making sure that everybody knows just how much they do not like that parent.

Does the child truly believe it or are they supporting the alienating parent?

That’s a lot and, and I’m sitting here thinking to myself and, you, you probably will know this when they’re doing that do they, actually really truly believe it or are they doing it because they’re just supporting the alienating parent, even when they’re absent, do they actually genuinely believe this?

Yeah, so, that’s particularly relevant for one of the 8 Behavioural Manifestations it’s called ‘absence of guilt’, and what that means is, that they don’t seem to feel badly, when they hurt the targeted parent. And, one of my little piffy, whatever, sayings is “alienation is where one parent gives the child permission to break the other parent’s heart.” Because that is you know one way to think about it is that these kids really treat their parent very, very, very badly you know “you can’t come to my, you know sweet 16 party” or “I don’t want you walking me down the aisle”, or “don’t show up for this”, or “I never loved you.”

I actually saw a video once, of an alienated kid, I guess the, for whatever reason the dad was filming this, and she said “you know Dad it’s like this. If I had a watch, and it got to be an old watch and it broke I would just throw it in the garbage. That’s how I feel about you. If you died I would just say oh well who cares.” These kids can be very, very, very callous, and when Richard Gardner coined the term absence of guilt, at the time, I think many of us assumed, that the kids actually felt no guilt while they were behaving this way. But then, in 2007, or five when I was doing the research but the first book came out in 2007, it involved interviewing adults who went through this as kids. And a lot of them talked about how guilty they felt. At the time, and later when they realised what they had done. And that’s one of the reasons that alienation is so damaging, for the child is on some level they know they are breaking their parent’s heart, they know they are being callous, and they feel very ashamed and guilty and that’s the kind of thing that stays with them as they grow up.

So to answer that was a very long way of saying, I believe that many of them feel guilty in the moment, I can’t say every single one, but the presentation is a callous presentation. “I don’t care”, “I don’t have to say thank you to this gift that you’re giving me because you’re only giving it to me to look good for the judge”, so their behaviour is very callous. But inside, I believe that many of them feel very badly about what they’re doing.

Yeah. What, what you’re speaking I’m just thinking what a difficult world to live in as a young child in this world where everything is being, turned upside down and you have no power whatsoever to restore it, to, or maybe even recognition of what is going on, um, within their inner world and their emotional world and you know, very difficult.

Does parental alienation often get physical?

I remember with working with the first, when we, before we started recording I was telling you when I first, learned about parenting alienation and it was a dad who had come to me um, who was a separated dad and, he was becoming a little bit, what he was getting worried that his daughter was now coming home, to him on the weekends or every other weekend, and um, first it was verbal, you know, “go away”, “I hate you”, but then it started escalating to pushing, to hitting, to scratching, to biting and he could not understand and it happened so fast, and when he would speak with the mom about this, the mom would say “well you know what can I do?” and when she’d go home and tell, you know he would say a couple of times he said you know “she did, try to push me down the stairs today” and, and the mom would say “well next time push harder.” So that was my first encounter with that does it, I don’t use the word always but, but does it often get physical as well?

The common element is that the kids interact with the targeted parent, in very provocative ways partly, to unconsciously, get that parent to behave badly back so that they have an excuse for cutting off that parent. In other words, what you said a moment ago is very true it’s very, very hard to live in this space of divided loyalties and, on some level it would be easier for the kids, if they’re like and I’m just going to use the example of dad being the alienator but we know it goes either way, you know Dad’s right mom’s a terrible person I’m going to cut her off, and now I know there’s good and there’s bad and I know where my you know, I’m hitching my wagon here, I know where, what’s what.

So, for a kid who again let’s say the dad’s the alienator, come, is still going back and forth when they show up at Mom’s house, they’re going to be very, very, very difficult and rejecting. Partly to trigger that parent to then do something, “fine go live with your dad”, or hitting the kid, or saying something cruel to the child and then the child’s like I’m done and, even though a child doesn’t really want to cut off a parent in the short term, immediate world that they live in, it might be easier for them and so that’s partly why they do it. So a big part of what I do in my coaching, is helping parents, I call it you know “don’t take the bait.” And, I try to teach parents lots, and lots, and lots of ways to navigate when the child is being provocative, so that they don’t become reactive either depressed and give up or, angry and unkind, because either inadvertently reinforce the lie. Right. The lie is again using the example dad’s the alienator, the lie is that Mom is unsafe, unloving, unavailable. So the kid shows up is uncooperative, or unpleasant in some way, and then if Mom behaves in a way that’s unkind, or rejecting the kid says, “oh Dad’s right”. We go, yeah, right.

What is Loyalty Conflict?

And you spoke about loyalty, and loyalty conflicts and, in your, in your book there’s some where you I think it was on, page 100 where you, I’ll just read it to you um, where you say “inside every alienated child is a child who feels rejected. This is an essential insight. Whenever your child who’s caught up in a loyalty conflict, cruelly rejects you, know that it’s actually feeling rejected by you.” Is that, in essence what loyalty conflict is? It’s in essence what alienation is. Loyalty conflict is, I don’t have a specific technical definition but it’s sort of, it could be coming from within the child. Whereas alienation is being induced by the, by a parent. Yeah.

In other words if you had two best friends who hated each other, you might feel a loyalty conflict, even if neither of them is egging you on to say “oh you should ditch that other friend” right? So loyalty, good example actually, yeah, sure we can all relate to that so loyalty conflict is more internal, and kids do feel it you know, um, that’s sort of the, sort of the breeding ground if you will of the alienation because it’s hard to be in a loyalty conflict, so one parent can scoop the child up and keep them all for themselves, you know, in a way that as I said earlier it can be relief to the child. In the long run it’s not good for kids, we, it’d be better to help them manage the loyalty conflict, manage the alienation, and obviously to get parents to stop engaging in alienation.

My focus, because this is just what um, I have access to I don’t have access to,you know favoured parents they’re not coming to me saying “teach me how not to be an alienator”, I have the targeted parents coming to me saying to me “how to deal with my child when my child accuses me of something I didn’t do”, or “teach me what to do when my child is unpleasant with me and I just don’t know what to do”, so that’s really where my heart is right now. Yeah, yeah, and you’re, and you’re right it’s, it’s exactly what I see in my own practice where, it’s usually the targeted parent who sits there and I think to myself oh my God I wish it were the other parent who was here but you know you rarely, oh no there’s one that I’m seeing at the moment, but that’s because of the place that I work with the organisation that I work with so, I have to see both parents so she she’s kind of coming in.

What would you say to the parent who is the one sending the poisonous messages?

So you mentioned already about um, the messages and denigration of the other parents so what would you say to a parent who’s the one who where they know that their poisonous messages being sent, and the child is reacting to? So what would you do when your ex is sending poisonous messages? I mean it’s like you know because I actually, my latest book is called “Parenting Under Fire” right, and the first third of the book is, that’s what it is. Is um, how do you interact with a child who’s being provocative, who’s being basically convinced that you don’t love them or that you’re are not safe?

And I’ll just talk high level for a moment the way that I think about it, is, turning up the volume on the positive, parts of the relationship or otherwise called “enhancing the attachment” and that is something that a lot of parents don’t do you know there’s some interesting research, like especially with much younger kids that like with a toddler, a parent gives several hundred commands a day. “Don’t do this”, “don’t do that”, “hold my hand”, “don’t spill your milk”, you know “now we’re going to the playground”, “put on your coat.” It’s just command, command, command, command, command. And so part of what I think is important for parents who are dealing with this, is to make sure, that they are infusing the relationship with a feeling of love and safety and belonging, for the child.

And, it’s not as simple as saying “I’m a safe parent.” I mean I wish it were, but it’s not, it’s about being safe, loving, and available and I’ll just give you one example because it’s sort of my, one of my favourite ones. How you say “yes” or how you say “no” to your child matters and this is something that a lot of people just don’t think about that much like if your child says to you “can I have ice cream for breakfast?” Most likely a parent would say, even forgetting about alienation like “what are you talking about, we don’t need ice cream for breakfast” and targeted parent might say “who told you to ask me did your mother?” Let’s say it’s the dad, “did your mother put you up to this?” Right, “do you get to eat ice cream at the other parents house?” Like they might, start trying to figure out is this alienation going on? Why is my kid, asking for something? Where now I’m going to have to say no.

What I work on with my clients is, to think about how they say no, not just saying no. So for example, I teach them this skill called “joining the wish.” So instead of saying “ice cream isn’t healthy why would you have”, you know all that negativity, right, which makes a child feel badly about themselves, “why would you ask rice cream for breakfast?” You’re basically saying “you stupid idiot” right, or “you know we don’t eat ice cream for breakfast”, now you’re calling your child like a liar. So instead you say “oh man, I wish ice cream were a healthy breakfast choice, you can have that later, now you can choose between pancakes and waffles.” And I don’t care what it is “Dad give me a million bucks”, “I wish I had a million bucks to give you, what would you do with it? Tell me how you would spend it?”

Likewise, even saying yes, it’s how you say yes that matters, so imagine you have a teenager who says, you know “can I have 20 bucks to go to the mall?” You could literally take a $20 bill and throw it at them and say “here take your stupid money.” They’re getting the money, but it’s you know, ruined basically with the negativity or you could say “you know what, yes, I have $20 extra I’d love to give it to you, I hope you have a blast, here it is.” So how we do things matters I think more than people, parents kind of realise.

And then the third example is, if your, let’s say, it’s 11 o’ at night your kids’ in bed, you’re in bed, ready for bed and your kids says “oh my God Mom I forgot I have to bring cupcakes to school tomorrow” and, you know the supermarket’s closing we have to go now right now. I’m not saying you have to do it, and that’s a different calculation – are you going to do it or are you going to teach your child a lesson and responsibility? That’s for you to figure out depending on, you know is this the first time this has happened or the 10th time that’s happened but let’s say you’re going to do it. If you’re going to do it, do it with love. Do not lecture your child about how irresponsible they are, how inconvenient it is, you know rolling your eyes and huffing and puffing, “let’s just get this done”, “I can’t believe you forgot again”, because at the end of that little trip to the supermarket, yeah, you might think like wow what a hero I am I took my child to the store and I didn’t have to, but all the child’s gonna think is yeah, “Dad’s right, mom’s not very nice”.

Yeah. What I teach parents is, if you do it, do it with love. And the next day you can say to your child “you know, that wasn’t so convenient, to have to go to the store at 11 o’clock at night. What could we do so that doesn’t happen again?” And so the things to notice is there’s no shaming, no blaming, not like you were bad, you were wrong, it’s that wasn’t convenient, so you’re talking for yourself, I didn’t love having to get dressed after I was in my pyjamas, and then you’re engaging in mutual problem solving, what could we do, so that doesn’t happen again? And maybe you and the kid will come up with a really cool solution, like when you pick the child up from school every day, before you drive home, you say “anything you need?” Or maybe there’s a Post-It note on the refrigerator, or maybe you decide, this child’s old enough and the two of you agree, that it’s the child’s responsibility, and if they remember before 10 o’clock at night you will take them someplace to get what they need but if it’s after that, you might not feel like it. But the solution, ideally comes from the child.

Yeah, yeah. And then you say to the child “let’s check in, in a couple weeks and see how our solution is working”, because sometimes the first solution works but not always, and you’re teaching your child, respectful communication, mutually respectful problem solving, and your child’s going to feel so much better about the relationship, and that’s really what you want you want to teach your child the values of responsibility, right? You don’t want to be at your child’s mercy like, “it’s 3 in the morning and I want to go get poster board”, you know, you’re not, that’s obviously not ideal for the child, yeah, but more important than teaching the child responsibility, is teaching the child that you, you, love them, and that, you can work out problems in a way that feels good for both of you.

How does the affected parent still act with love, despite all the hatred from the alienated child?

I’m sitting here and I’m thinking to myself how with, with you know listening to some of the parents that I’ve worked with, where they get so affected by what is happening to them where the child is you know is telling them “I hate you”, “go away” you know, just, really going at them bubbly and sometimes you know just trying to get them, locking them in the bathroom when they go in, they try and lock them in, and they laugh and, and everything like that. Um, and they, the feelings they might be carrying with them at that moment where they think that, they feel really angry, rejected, and then having to then respond with love, it might not be that straightforward. So how, how do they, how do they manage all the, I would call them “natural feelings” that would come from the hate that is being shown towards them?

So I, I, guess I’d have two responses to that the first is, the quote you read and I don’t even know which book that was from by the way but inside every alienated child is a child who feels rejected, okay, cool all right I don’t keep track of everything but I, absolutely believe that. Yeah, yeah. It made sense when I read it, yeah. But it is important for the targeted parent, to understand their experience, if you’re a targeted parent your experience is that you are chasing your child, okay, you want more, and your child is rejecting you. But that’s not the child’s experience. The child’s experience is you have fundamentally hurt them in some profound way that they are reacting to.

So the reason that insight’s important is because it could help parents feel more empathic towards their child. Yeah, actually as soon as you said that I felt oh, because I, yeah, when you were describing, it, you know the whole you know scenario earlier on, I was thinking oh my gosh that would be so painful, so painful, so painful, so hurtful, how do how would I manage that? And then when you said that this time I just thought oh, yes I am chasing my child I am trying to I don’t know if it’s reattach, reconnect um, parent them, basically.

But the child’s experience is that you’re rejecting them, so you if you can try to put yourself in the child’s shoes, and feel that empathy, for the child it definitely brings down, the hurt and the anger that you feel. Could you say that to your child, could you say “I think you’re treating me like this because you probably feel like I rejected you some way?” I’m not sure I would put that quite like that but I could say, you know, you, you, know “your behaviour showing me that you’re really not happy with me right now, that you’re pretty, upset, you’re, it seems like you’re hurt and angry and I’d like to understand what that’s about.” Yeah. Rather than “how dare you treat me that way.” Yeah, right. The emphasis is on the compassion for the child. But, I don’t recommend somebody having that conversation without getting, it doesn’t have to be me, but some coaching so they know what to do next.

That’s like opening the door but what do you do when your kid says “yeah you beat me when I was a baby” and the targeted parents says “I did not, who told you that?” Now you you’ve sort of just made another parenting error in my, in my opinion. Yeah. So yeah, yes, you can, you can try to have a conversation with your child about how they’re feeling, but you have to, you have to know how to do that, or else you’re just going to end up in an argument with them. “You did too steal my college money”, “I did not, look on this piece of paper it proves I didn’t – the money’s in the bank” and the kid says “I don’t care what’s on that piece of paper.” You know, “I was told that you stole the money and I believe that” so, it’s, at every step whether it’s the opening “hey I think you’re upset” all the way through. It’s not intuitive, it’s not obvious, some of it’s counter intuitive um, actually the opposite of what you think the, the right thing to do would be you actually need to do, something very different. Yeah. And that’s not to keep plugging my book but that’s really what ‘Parenting Under Fire’ is about. Okay. It’s like most people are okay, if not pretty good, if not even better, than pretty good parents but you, if you’re parenting under fire right, if you’re being attacked, your relationship is being attacked, you need a whole other level of parenting skills. Yeah.

Why do parents alienate their children?

Why do parents alienate? I know you said that sometimes they’re not even, you know aware that they’re doing it but, I’m thinking of all the parents that I’ve worked with and the ones that I’m currently working with, what is it about them, that they feel “I need to tell my child what he did”, I need to, you know, it’s almost like some of them say “I tell my child everything because they need to know everything that happen and what a bad person she is or he is” and so, what is it about that parent that gets them to…

So, I can tell you from the research I’ve done interviewing adults who have lived through this what they say about the parent who did this to them, um, there is no one like typical alienating parent right I mean sometimes they do it because, their whole life is the child and they just don’t want to go from being a full-time parent to a part-time parent. You know, especially for parents who invest a lot of time you know a stay-at-home parent whether it’s the mom or dad both parents do this, but if you are the parent who’s sort of really, really, really, really, invested all this time and you’re used to being with your child all this time, it’s very painful, to then go to, let’s say you know 50/50 or whatever the schedule is, so some people just want their kids, you know that some people are angry, and they feel like you know well “if you don’t want me then you’re rejecting us” because they sort of conflate, you know, the end of the marriage with, you know rejection of the of themselves plus their kids and some people even say “oh daddy doesn’t love us anymore” or “if mommy really loved us she wouldn’t have moved out.” So they’re encouraging the kids to conflate.

There’s just so many, different scenarios you know a, another typical scenario is the parent who gets remarried, and really has this fantasy that their new spouse is “the real parent” and um, have, they have this idea that this is the “real true family” and they really like the other parent is like an, you know an inconvenience, in a way because it for some fantasy bubble about what about, about their family life.

Yeah that’s actually a really good one because I’ve, I’ve experienced that as well with, most of the clients I’ve worked with are dads and where I remember there was actually one mom, who remarried and, you know she actively wanted the dad out of the picture um, and she called me trying to get in, not just trying, to get information around my work but at some point I had to say “I’m not really sure what you’re looking for” um, you know and then she said “well actually to be honest I am the wife, ex-wife of so and so and I just want to know did he attend the classes, did he do this” and I thought wow this was really, another way of going around to say he’s a bad person, he’s a bad dad, um, very active.

And I think something else that I just thought about was just knowing that parental alienation is not, confined to one group of people, so we know it’s not just men, it’s not just women um, we know, it can be the, CEO of a big company, it can be the mother who or the father who’s on benefits with nothing else, so it does, there’s no, same sex couples, it happens in same sex, couples, yeah, it can happen anytime. And sometimes in a weird sense of way it can also happen in intact homes where they’re living together, so it’s not just in, in divorce, um, sometimes people end a marriage because they’re like, you know, I need time alone with my kid and I can never have time alone because the other parents always there undermining me. Sometimes people stay married because they’re like “oh my God if I lived in another home I’d probably never see my kids.” Yeah. So it definitely happens in intact families. Yeah, yeah.

I feel like walking away from my child, how do I create that bond?

So I can see we’ve got like 10 minutes left and I, I want to um ask one question you’ve touched it but I’m sitting and I’m thinking about the parents who might be listening to this or watching this and um, “I’m the alienated parent and I’m like Dr Baker what do I do from here? He just doesn’t want to come to my house anymore, calls me all these names I love him, but I feel like walking away tell me how I can recreate that bond.”

I understand the impulse to walk away and I understand that many targeted parents have people whispering or, whispering in their ears especially their parents who love them most of all, and they’re like “well you know teach him a lesson”, you know I’m just going to use a male child you know, “he needs to learn that he can’t talk to you that way” and um, you know he’ll only, “he’ll come around eventually” you know. I think that it’s very hard to be a, to love somebody who is a targeted parent and see that that child is breaking that parent’s heart and so there’s a lot of, pressure I think sometimes on targeted parents to walk away.

And even therapists sometimes or, you know might tell you know, if you’re a therapist and you have a targeted parent client you want to protect your, client who’s suffering and you might say “maybe you need to step away, write a goodbye letter, take a break.” The problem that I have with all of that, is, I don’t actually think the targeted parent feels better for having done that, and it reinforces for the child that the parent doesn’t care. So, the question I would say that a targeted parent can ask themselves is, what can I do in this moment to counter the lie. The lie is that you’re unsafe, unloving, and unavailable. And it might mean full out, you know trial that you prepare a year for and spend $100,000 on with the top-notch lawyer and you’re totally you’re basically like a paralegal by the time it’s over because you’ve decided, given your circumstances and your energy level that that’s where you’re going to go, you know, guns blazing trying to win a proper solution in court.

For other people given the age of their child, their own, you know financial, and emotional, and energy level situation, it might mean sending a text every day to the child. Yeah, yeah. You have to match the solution to the circumstance, you know if you have a five-year-old who’s refusing to come, and you have money, you some resources, I would not say give up. It’s way too early, the courts are much more likely to want to be helpful with a younger child, and, at least you should know your options. If your kid is 17 and you don’t have money or you’re battling a medical illness yourself, or some, you’re taking care of a dying parent or there’s, whatever you know, just tremendous other stressor in your life, you’re probably not going to go to court it doesn’t make sense. So to me it’s not binary give up, not give up. It’s today, what is my plan, what do I have the time, money, energy for what do I think make sense.

Sadly, many people do not get enough support from their lawyer. Lawyers are very reactive, “oh that parent showed up on your time we’ll do X”, “oh that parent did this bad thing, we’ll do Y.” What I try to do with my clients is here’s five things you could ask for of the court, let’s look at the pros and cons of each of them, and see what makes sense, if any, and then I usually say “did your attorney do this with you?” “No.” It just makes me upset. Now, if the child’s over 18 obviously court, is, off the table, and then the question is how can you, communicate with your child? You know um, either by text or, um, and that’s like the second section of my book ‘Parenting Under Fire’ is all about texting. Why, how, what to do, what to do when your kid responds this way that way, and then the final third of the book is how to write a letter, to an adult alienated child it’s very specific philosophy, it’s probably different than other letters other people have written.

Um, so I think generally there are things to do. Short of devoting your life to trying to maintain your relationship with your child, there’s still things you can do, so you have the satisfaction of knowing you tried, so your child knows that you tried, you can think about it as like you’re leaving a trail of breadcrumbs so they can find their way back to you when they’re ready. Um, I rarely think there’s a, a time when you would say “I’m done.” Whether it’s with a provocative 12 year old, or, you know, 15y old, or 25 year old, I, I rarely recommend that’s it wipe your hands of that person they’re, yeah, better off without them. That’s my, kind of long-winded answer to that.

What must I not do as the affected parent?

Yeah and, and, what should, what shouldn’t I do in terms of um, so my 5-year-old doesn’t want to come, what must, I must, what must I not do? You don’t negotiate with the child, if the child says you know, at whatever age, “I’ll come Thursday if you let me leave Friday.” Let’s say the kid’s supposed to be there Thursday, Friday, Saturday, you never negotiate with the child because then you can’t hold the other parent accountable, right, your legal contract, your parenting plan is with the other parent not with the child, even if the child is 17, the answer is Mom and Dad work on the schedule. So you don’t have to be rude to your child, “you’re just a child, you’re an idiot, you don’t know anything”, you know, but you just don’t negotiate with the child. You always show up for your parenting time, even if the child says “don’t bother showing up Saturday morning, I’m not going to be there”, “well it’s my time to pick you up, I’m gonna be there” and then you document it if the, if you know you don’t get your child, when you’re supposed to, you show up, then you send an email, you know “I was there” and I, you know “nobody seemed to be home” I say you wait 20 minutes you don’t just “oh they’re not there” and you leave, and then you leave.

There was another last um, quote that I had here, where you said “as a co-parent with a toxic ex, you don’t have the luxury of being a mediocre parent, um you need to spend time engaging in meaningful interactions with your child, you need to invest yourself, your time your attention, in the relationship, to cultivate a deep and abiding bond that will be less susceptible to your ex’s interference and attempts to undermine your authority. So really just covering what you said at, some point during the interview, where you said, “you’re chasing after your child”, “you’re looking for your child”, “you’re parenting your child” and “doing whatever it is that you can with your time, at that moment, with your child” um, just making the plans and going, and keep going with them.

The one tweak I would add to that is I don’t actually believe that we should be labelling anybody as toxic I, I did not want to name book that, I know a lot of people like that, but you know that if, let’s say you’re a mom and you’re a target, you believe you’re a targeted parent and you’re reading the book and the kid sees it they’re going to be like, “oh so you think Dad’s toxic?” Like I just don’t think it helps, I, I don’t believe in calling you know children rude, or disrespectful, or calling the other parent, you know narcissist, or toxic, or abusive, is of used now. Yeah narcissist, has become like it’s got its part in the limelight now, so you change the title of your, okay.

You know the publisher really insisted and it’s a very popular book you know I, I stand by the book, I just don’t love the title. It’s a great book, it’s a great book, and just the last chapter where actually chapter, the final section that says final words so I’m just thinking anybody who gets this book, the last section what I liked about this part um, where you say “we encourage you to ponder these questions to find your own truth” and you have all these questions here, um, that when I looked at them I’m thinking to myself this actually makes the parent to be reflective, of what is going on. So you check yourself, as opposed to reacting to, what’s in front of you but how is this, how can I remember that my child is a victim, when she’s treat treating me so badly and causing me so much pain and suffering. You know it’s not them, and if you keep that in mind then you’re like okay, you know this is, not, the way it was supposed to turn out you know. How can I cultivate compassion in both myself and my child, so really getting the parents to look, inwardly um, at themselves as well um, as the situation that presents in front of them.

I had so many questions, and this is such a big topic and um, I’m glad that we’re talking about it, I’m glad it’s being spoken about more, and more, and more, and more, because it does happen, it does exist, it’s painful, it’s disturbing um, there are no winners in the game, you know, short term or long term, and um, I want to say thank you so much. Thank you so much, and um, who you know those who are listening. Amy has got so many books on her website I went there and I saw you’ve got your 10 books, you’ve got your papers there, please visit the website and I’ll tell you what it is in a minute amyjlbaker.com. Everything is on there and the coaching program is on there as well. Thank you Amy, you’re so welcome great conversation, thank you so much.

[Music]

About Dr Amy J.L. Baker

Dr. Baker is a nationally recognised expert in parental alienation, and parent-child relationships, especially children of divorce, and emotional abuse of children.

She has a Ph.D. in developmental psychology from Teachers College of Columbia University. She is the author or co-author of 10 books and over 120 academic articles on topics related to children’s wellbeing.

The Pros and Cons of Nesting
Photo by Dương Nhân: https://www.pexels.com/photo/woman-standing-near-open-door-about-to-step-outside-2297663/

The Pros and Cons of Nesting

Connie Atkinson
Connie Atkinson
Partner
Kingsley Napley
Rachel Freeman
Rachel Freeman
Partner
Kingsley Napley

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The recent news that Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his wife Sophie are separating after 18 years of marriage hit the headlines not only because they are a high profile couple on the political world stage but because they intend to opt for a nesting pattern of co-parenting their three children from here on – an approach which is also growing in popularity on this side of the pond. In this article Kingsley Napley Family Law partners Connie Atkinson and Rachel Freeman explore the pros and cons of nesting arrangements for separating couples.

What is a nesting arrangement?

It is an arrangement which sees children remain in the family home while the parents take it in turns to leave and live elsewhere for short periods. A second, usually smaller, property is rented or purchased and each parent stays there when they are not in the family home with the children.  In some families, where finances permit, each parent has their own separate property where they live when they are not in the family home.

What are the pros for children?

In the right circumstances, birdnesting gives children and parents time to adjust to a separation without significant changes being imposed immediately. Children often crave stability when parents decide to split and being able to remain in their home while navigating their feelings around their parents’ separation can be helpful.

If children remain in the family home, they can maintain their routines and local friendships and remain at the same school, clubs and activities.  Children avoid having to shuttle between two homes and retain the familiar and safe space in their bedroom with all their belongings in one place.

What are the cons for children?

In reality birdnesting is only likely to work for a small number of families and in many cases only for a short period of time. Children need to adjust to the reality of their parents’ separation which includes a new home and bedroom with the other parent. In some cases the former family home is going to be sold at some point and so there will be a change of environment for children in any event. If birdnesting is attempted in unsuitable cases, it can risk creating (or sustaining) a toxic environment for children in what is supposed to be their safe space.

What are the pros for parents?

In the right circumstances birdnesting gives parents time to adjust to the separation too and avoid the need for numerous moves before buying a new home. It can also help remove the pressure of agreeing arrangements for the children immediately upon separation.

Parents might feel strongly about minimising disruption to their children, particularly if they themselves have unhappy memories of moving between two homes on divorce in their youth.

Birdnesting can save costs, avoiding the need, for example, to buy two sets of bedroom furniture, clothes, toys and books.  It might offer a solution where the parents cannot afford two family homes upon divorce; with a nesting arrangement they only need one home big enough for a parent and the children and the other property can be much smaller.

What are the cons for parents?

In reality, birdnesting is unlikely to work long term. People move on at different paces following separation and it is not unusual for the parents’ views and priorities to take different directions as time moves on, which can make birdnesting more difficult. Birdnesting also becomes much more difficult if new partners are involved or when the separated spouses find a new relationship.

A downside of birdnesting is that it does not allow parents to move on and live independent lives. This is relevant in the context of the court’s usual approach on divorce which is to achieve a clean break between the parties where possible. Birdnesting means still running one, or even two, households together with all the costs, bills, food, cleaning, chores, maintenance and other admin that that entails. There are likely to be constant reminders of a former partner, seeing their belongings around or evidence of their daily routine and habits. Depending on the size of the property, parents might also have to use the same bedroom and bathroom as their former partner which can feel uncomfortable.

Birdnesting requires a lot of communication and organisation, particularly at the beginning when emotions can be very raw.

What practical tips might help to make nesting work?

  • Explore whether birdnesting will work by discussing your intentions and the practicalities in an appropriate forum such as mediation.
  • Parents need to have maintained a positive relationship on separation and be good at communicating with one another.
  • Agree a set of household rules and responsibilities, including how to deal with food shopping, bills, repairs, and who else can be in the home.
  • Have regular meetings to consider what is working well with the nesting arrangement and whether anything needs to be changed.
  • Employ a cleaner, especially for handover days.
  • Consider how personal belongings and communications will be dealt with to ensure each parent can maintain some privacy.

According to recent research by Coop Legal Services some 11% of divorced or separated parents in the UK have tried birdnesting and in the current economic climate it may well appeal to more separating couples, to avoid the costs of running two homes large enough for the children or if the family home cannot be sold.  Every family is different and the family’s individual circumstances and dynamics will dictate whether birdnesting works for the parents and their children and for the long or short term.

Read more articles by Kingsley Napley Family Law here.

About Connie Atkinson and Rachel Freeman

Connie is a Partner in the family team and has experience of dealing with all aspects of private family work relating to both finances and children. She is recognised as a Rising Star Legal 500 UK for Family: Mediation and ranked in Chambers UK as up and coming in Family/Matrimonial. Connie also won family lawyer of the year and national private client lawyer of the year at the Private Client Modern Law Awards 2023.

Rachel is a partner in Kingsley Napley’s family and divorce team. She specialises in dealing with financial settlements and the arrangements for children arising upon the breakdown of a relationship. Rachel is recognised in the Legal 500 and the Citywealth Leaders and Powerwomen Leaders lists.

Our Successful Nesting Co-Parenting Arrangement Benefited From a Team of Professionals.
Photo by Jimmy Dean on Unsplash.
/

Helping Children Cope with Divorce: 6 Essential Steps

Soila Sindiyo
Soila Sindiyo
Psychologist and Founding Editor
TDM

Divorce happens. And as soon as the children know about it, that moment, can become a watershed moment for your child or children. However, as much as divorce is important, what is even more crucial is how it’s handled.

The divorce process is already physically, emotionally and mentally challenging making it extremely hard to play the good, attentive and caring parent as much you would like to.

You will make mistakes no doubt. You will say things and do things with your child in the room that you wish you hadn’t. Then you will spend time worrying that you have somehow permanently damaged your child.

“Crazy” moments like these, that are not consistent and repetitive, are quickly and easily mended with an acknowledgement from you to them that it shouldn’t have happened followed by a genuine apology.

Divorce being the delicate, confusing and life-changing time that it is, here are some important things to keep in mind when looking after your children:

  • Don’t go it alone! Get yourself some support. This is said so often yet it’s amazing how so many don’t do it and continue walking around like some sort of warrior person. You see without support, good, strong and objective support, you will crack. And when you do, the people closest to you will be the first to be affected and those people are very likely going to be your children. So put your own support system in place.
  • Don’t assume that your children understand why your marriage ended, especially the younger ones. You know why and your partner knows why too but for children, splitting up the family to make life better may not make any sense and if it doesn’t make sense then they cannot cope with it all. So do, pay attention to the questions they ask and try and answer them in the best way possible without painting their other parent as the horrid, evil villain – even if it’s true. Remember as Haim Ginott says, children never ask questions to which they know the answer
  • Avoid making promises that you know you won’t or cannot keep. Don’t say things on the spur of the moment just to make them feel better knowing that in time, the truth will reveal itself and they will be left feeling crushed. For instance don’t promise that you will get back together or that you will see them every weekend if you know that that will never be the case. If you don’t know what will happen, tell them exactly that.
  • Create parenting plans that are child centred and appropriate for their age as opposed to what works just for you. An 18-month toddler cannot build a good and loving relationship if he only sees his father once a month for one day. A parenting plan created for a three-yea-old is unlikely to work the same way on a 13 year old. So be prepared to adjust the plan as your child grows.
  • Do let your child’s school know what’s going on. Don’t ask your children to keep affairs of the home secret. It’s not fair. You school-aged child spends most of his/her/their waking time at school so they will need looking after there as much as at home.
  • A stitch in time saves nine. If you are concerned about your child’s changes in behaviour, then do contact a professional as soon as possible.This person can help you continue parenting your child as you would like. It doesn’t mean you’re incapable of doing this, on the contrary, it means that you are continuing to look after your child by getting you and him/her help so as to make them feel better as they rebuild their lives.

Divorce is a watershed moment in the life of any child, no matter how amicable the whole process is.

Having said this, divorce needn’t be a trauma that permanently changes who your child is. Handle it well and it will be something your child went through at some point in his/her life as opposed to something that now and forever defines who they are.

Read more articles by Soila.

About Soila

Soila is a child development psychologist and the founding editor of The Divorce Magazine. She is known for easing the pain of trauma and loss in children, adolescents and their families and has been working with children and families for almost two decades.  Soila holds a BSc (Hons) in psychology from the Open University and an MSc in Psychoanalytic Developmental Psychology from UCL (University College London). She is an accredited Positive Parenting Program (Triple P) practitioner and very recently completed her professional doctoral training in Counselling Psychology and is awaiting registration.

Mutual Parenting After Divorce: Putting Children First
Photo by Eye for Ebony on Unsplash.

Mutual Parenting After Divorce: Putting Children First

Noel McDermott
Noel McDermott
Founder
Mental Health Works Ltd

It’s clear that staying together for the sake of the kids is no longer something we believe in.

In the UK, divorce rates are high (42% of marriages end up in divorce), and this is not likely to drop.

The question is then, what is best for our kids?

As a general rule what we do is more important than what we say and indeed much therapy in relationships is about getting people to look at actions not words; in our actions are our truths. This is never more so than in our parenting practice.

Modelling healthy behaviours around relationships and relationship breakups is of vital importance for our kids.

Children see a lot more than you think and see much less of what you imagine.

They are egocentric and look for their needs to be met. Around their family the core needs are, love, consistency and them being central to family life. The advice that follows relates to situations in which there is no danger to yourself or your children from the behaviour of your ex, such as situations of domestic abuse.

Safety of yourself and your kids are the most important issues there and the best thing you can do is get police and legal help to get away safely.

Putting Children First

If you are going through a breakup with your partner and have children, the key rule is to organise the breakup in a child centric way, to ensure you put them first during the process, that their needs for love and safety are met. Not by saying that it is important, but by showing it is important.

Some golden rules in navigating a child centred breakup:

  • Never trash talk your ex or soon to be ex around your kids.
  • Don’t put your children in a position to have to make choices about who they can be loyal to.
  • If possible, show affection and kindness to each other in front of your kids, even if this is painful. Maybe agree a script and touch boundaries.
  • Be honest with your kids about being sad about the breakup if that is true for you but explain that this happens between adults.
  • Try, if possible, to have ‘family’ events.
  • Think about blended family events if one person has another relationship.

Keep communication going

In parenting the key thing is ongoing communication between the parents and this is even more important between co-parents who are not sharing a physical home together.

A very close second to this is parents not undermining each other or allowing themselves to be played off against each other. Kids need consistency in the parenting they receive, and a breakup is no reason to fall down on this. It’s maybe better to rid yourself of the idea that you are breaking up because in many ways you are not. You will have a couple relationship for the life of your kids even into their adult relationships, but the boundaries will shift away from the sexual intimacy and house sharing for example. Although that is important to you, it shouldn’t have much impact on children if you maintain a loving and friendly co-parenting relationship.

There are key messages in all of this for your kids which are crucial for them for the whole of their lives:

  • They remain the most important thing in their parents’ lives.
  • Their parents are able to put their needs first and as divorce and breakup is likely for them, they can use this modelling in their later lives with their own kids.
  • Love relationships can survive change and remain healthy and strong when the boundaries change radically.

Successful co-parenting

The evidence for successful co-parenting is beyond challenge these days and if you manage to navigate it successfully there will be no damage to your children’s’ life outcomes.

Whilst divorce is still listed as an ACE (adverse childhood experience), it is more about how the divorce is navigated and it’s more correct to say a messy and acrimonious divorce is an ACE.

About Noel McDermott

Noel McDermott is the Founder of Mental Health Works Ltd. He has created unique, mental health services in the independent sector. Noel’s company offer at-home mental health care and will source, identify and co-ordinate personalised care teams for the individual. They have recently launched a range of online therapy resources to help clients access help without leaving home.

Is There Any Way of 'Forcing' a Non-Residential Parent to See His/Her Children?
Photo by Daiga Ellaby on Unsplash.
//

Is There Any Way of ‘Forcing’ a Non-Residential Parent to See His/Her Children?

Megan Bennie
Megan Bennie
Family Law Solicitor
Furley Page

For many co-parents, one of the most challenging aspects of separated parenting is when one parent does not choose to spend as much time with their child as the other parent thinks they ought to.   In some cases, a parent may not see their child at all, whether through choice or circumstance.

The short answer to the question of whether a parent can be forced to spend time with their child, which I know will be disappointing for a lot of parents, is no.  If a parent will not spend time with their child, then they cannot be forced to do so.   The courts are not prepared to make orders forcing contact, and it is difficult to see if and how such an order could be enforced, or whether such an order would be beneficial or productive.

It is worth remembering that even if one parent chooses not to see their child, they will still have a responsibility to make child maintenance payments and an application can be made to the Child Maintenance Service if it cannot be agreed directly.

However, where there is already an arrangement in place, by virtue of agreement or a court order, if the arrangement falters, there are steps that can be taken.

There will inevitably be circumstances in which contact does not take place for a period.  For example, illness, holidays, or other life circumstances. Where the change to the contact arrangement is tackled in a way that is sensitive to a child’s needs and courteous to the other parent, this need not be a major issue.

However, in circumstances where the withdrawal from contact/the relationship is for a prolonged period or comes suddenly with no explanation, it can leave children feeling let down, confused and as if they are not a priority.

It can also be distressing for the parent trying to facilitate the contact to see their child upset, and they may feel their efforts are not appreciated, leading to further breakdown in the relationship between the parents.  In such circumstances it may be more appropriate to look at how contact is structured and assess whether a different arrangement might benefit the child and promote contact, allowing for greater consistency.

There are many process options available for these discussions. For example, this could be addressed directly with the other parent, at mediation, by instructing a solicitor or, if all else fails, by making an application to the court:

  • What level is contact set at? The court will bear in mind what is going to be achievable for parents and children.  A parent who struggles to maintain a relationship with very regular contact sessions might be able to achieve less frequent contact, but if that contact is better quality – or actually takes place rather than being cancelled – it could be better for the child involved.
  • By what means is contact taking place? The parent-child relationship may be better maintained by means other than direct face-to-face contact time. Telephone or video calls could bridge the gap, or a parent in difficult circumstances might be able to accommodate those where spending time together in person simply isn’t possible.

For children who might have faced disappointment in the past through repeated or last-minute cancellations, calls or letters might fit more easily into their existing routine and limit the disruption they face, while still maintaining a relationship with the parent they don’t live with.

The age and capability of a child, as well as the effect and perception of any previous issues with contact, are important factors to consider.  What suits one child and promotes positive contact in a particular set of circumstances may not be suitable for another child or another set of circumstances.

If all else fails, the threat that future contact could be reduced can be a ‘stick rather than carrot’ approach to ensuring contact does go ahead.  The court can threaten to or even actually reduce contact, sometimes quite significantly, if it is apparent such a change is in the best interests of the child in question.  However, it would be exceedingly rare to have an order for no contact at all: the court tends to leave a door open for a parent/child relationship to continue except in the most severe of circumstances.

If you have questions about any aspects of child arrangements, whatever your situation, please do feel free to get in touch so one of the team of family law experts at Furley Page can help.

Contact Megan Bennie, Associate Solicitor in Furley Page’s family law team on 01227 763939 or email MEB@furleypage.co.uk.

Read more articles by Furley Page.

About Megan Bennie

Megan Bennie is an Associate in the family law team Furley Page.

Megan joined the team in 2021, having gained valuable previous experience at specialist family law firms featured in the Legal 500 directory.

Megan advises on all aspects of relationship breakdown, whether divorce or separation, including in relation to civil partnerships, dealing with issues such as the appropriate division of finances.

Megan also assists couples seeking to formalise arrangements through pre and post nuptial agreements and cohabitation (or living together) agreements. She can also assist with legal issues arising when cohabitation comes to an end whether there is a cohabitation agreement in place or not.

Megan can provide legal advice on a wide range of areas relating to children including arrangements for contact and who a child lives with, where a child lives (including relocation to another jurisdiction) and in relation to special guardianship and adoption.

Megan is primarily based at the Chatham office but is also available for meetings at either the Canterbury or Whitstable office.

What is Guardianship of a Child

What is Guardianship of a Child?

Vanessa Fox
Partner and Head of
Family Law
hlw Keeble Hawson

The rights and needs of children are of paramount importance in the eyes of the law.

One way of offering them a voice during legal proceedings is through the appointment of a guardian ad litem.

Generally, a guardian will be assigned to any child involved in supervision or care proceedings. That person, who is almost always a representative provided by Cafcass (Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service), acts on behalf of the child in court and ensures any decision is made in their best interests.

As part of their responsibilities, the guardian usually selects and appoints a solicitor to represent the child and advises the guardian, who in turn will help the court to consider outcomes for the children in the proceedings.

This doesn’t tend to happen in private law, where issues are between parents or extended family. There is usually no guardian involved and, although Cafcass is often asked to provide an independent report, its role is usually limited in cases where some contact has been agreed by the parents.

However, times are changing and we are seeing an increase in guardians being appointed for children in private children proceedings. There are a number of reasons for this.

It could happen where one party is self-represented and the court feels that that psychological reports or other expert testimony is needed, or where the court feels that significant findings of fact need to be made.

In cases where there is considerable conflict between both parents over access to the child, sometimes referred to as ‘implacable hostility’ cases, a guardian will be appointed.

A court will usually put a guardian in place for the child if it is believed the child may not be safe or will be adversely affected by the conflict, between the parents, which can originate in either parent.

Once a court has decided to appoint a guardian, there can be benefits for all parties. The child has an independent social worker and an independent solicitor acting in their best interests.

Where older children are involved, whose opinions will be very important to the court, a guardian will seek these views and feed them back to the court. The guardian’s solicitor can also advise older children directly.

In addition, the view of the guardian can be seen as an independent view, sometimes a very helpful check on the conflicting views of parents or extended family, with the help of an experienced family lawyer to advise the guardian.

About Vanessa

hlw Keeble Hawson partner, Vanessa Fox, marked 25 years as head of the firm’s family law department in 2016.

Collaboratively trained and a qualified mediator, she has modernised South Yorkshire Resolution since becoming chair in 2013 and is also a member of the Law Society’s Family Law Panel and the Children Panel.

She can be contacted on 0114 290 6232 or at vanessafox@hlwkeeblehawson.co.uk.

Dr Foster: a Stark Reminder why Children Should Never be Pawns in Parents’ Battles

Kate Banerjee
Partner and Head of the Children Department
Jones Myers Family Law Solicitors

The spotlight has fallen on youngsters who are caught in the explosive crossfire of warring parents following the volatile BBC melodrama, Doctor Foster.

The relentless and destructive behaviour of Tom’s divorced parents left the series on a cliffhanger, with the distraught 15 year old taking off on his own because all semblances of a normal family and school life had been stripped away.

The stark reality is that thousands of children and young people unwittingly find themselves trapped in the middle of constant conflict in the real world – irrespective of whether their parents are living together or apart.

Such damaging behaviour can not only affect youngsters’ mental health, the development of their social and emotional skills and academic achievements – it can also influence their ability to form future relationships

Responsible family lawyers put children at the heart of family law, always encouraging parents to work together to resolve their differences rather than engage in bitter conflict.

Couples who are not consumed by battles are more likely to strive towards supporting their offspring’s psychological and emotional needs. Failure to do so risks horrendous outcomes – as reinforced by Dr Foster’s conclusion.

I urge parents to choose collaboration over conflict at all times and follow these steps:

  1. Don’t use children as bargaining tools in your relationship with your ex – encourage them to see – and love – both parents.
  2. Linked with the above, don’t criticise your ex in front of them and avoid asking them directly or indirectly to take sides – no matter how resentful and bitter you feel about your former partner.
  3. Children need to feel loved by both parents as they struggle to come to terms with the breakdown of family life as they know it.
  4. Presenting a united front can help children to adjust. This includes agreeing on key areas such as bed times, amount of television or computer games and space and time for homework. For teenagers it extends to seeing friends and social/sports activities.
  5. Encourage your children to show a genuine interest in what they do during their time with the other parent.
  6. Listen to your sons and daughters; give them space and time to talk about their feelings.

I wholeheartedly understand that this guidance is given from the sanctuary of an office as opposed to the emotionally charged backdrops, which parents deal with daily when coping with their children and managing contact arrangements.

However, if both parents can draw on their inner strength to communicate with, and respond to, each other with dignity and care, they will reap the rewards of their children remaining loving and caring towards their mums and dads – and being considerably less likely to fall by the wayside of life.

About Kate Banerjee

Kate, Head of the Children Department at Leeds and London based Jones Myers, is highly skilled in cases relating to children including contact and residence disputes.

She specialises in child protection law and is a Member of the Child Care Panel with experience representing parents, guardians, Local Authorities and children.

As well as working regionally and nationally, Kate has considerable expertise in international child abduction cases and is a Member of the International Child Abduction and Custody Unit.

Kate has “Higher Court Rights,” which enables her to offer clients an all-round litigation service.

 

divorce and children's happiness

Children of Divorce – Why one Size does not Fit all when it Comes to Divorce and Children’s Happiness

Vanessa Fox
Partner and Head of
Family Law
hlw Keeble Hawson

In my long experience as a family lawyer, children of divorced or separated couples can be happy or unhappy – regardless of contact arrangements.

This view contradicts a study from Stockholm University which was widely reported and which claims that children who live full time with one parent are more likely to be stressed than those in shared custody.

Researchers say one explanation for the findings of the report – which relates to Swedish families 14 years ago – may be that children who spend most of their time away from one parent, lose contact with relatives, friends and money.

Rather than be drawn into the often widely differing findings of such studies, it is perhaps more important to concentrate on common sense, and take practical measures to reduce the impact of divorce and separation on children’s health and wellbeing.

While my professional experience is largely confined to parents who are in conflict during or following a break-up, it is apparent that different triggers spark stress in children and young people.

A child living with one parent could be thoroughly miserable with the arrangement – missing the other dreadfully, left insecure by the split – and with profound feelings of guilt and great trepidation about the future. If they have a good reason for not wanting to always be with the lone parent – their stress levels will escalate.

Conversely children whose separated parents get on very well – and who have regular contact with both – may become anxious over handovers from one parent to the other. Causes of aggravation might be unwelcome journeys, separation from friends, pressure of meeting schedules and unease with a non-resident parent they do not know as well.

The overarching goal in these situations is the same as that which lies at the heart of family law: in all cases and circumstances, the wellbeing of the child must come first.

While it is understandable at the outset of divorce or separation for both parents to want to share custody and contact equally, there are often so many reasons why this is not always possible. For example, children may not benefit from seeing both parents if one has insufficient time to sustain a relationship and stay abreast of their interests.

What is crucial is that parents do all they can to sort things out with maximum cooperation and minimum argument. It is vital that they behave like responsible grown-ups in arranging the needs and comfort of their children – planning meticulously, if possible together, and explaining lifestyle changes to the children as soon as possible.

To achieve this, parents can work with professional advisers who can guide them through all the considerations that make an amicable outcome possible and help reach agreement constructively through a collaborative route to divorce.

About Vanessa

hlw Keeble Hawson partner, Vanessa Fox, marked 25 years as head of the firm’s family law department in 2016.

Collaboratively trained and a qualified mediator, she has modernised South Yorkshire Resolution since becoming chair in 2013 and is also a member of the Law Society’s Family Law Panel and the Children Panel.

She can be contacted on 0114 290 6232 or at vanessafox@hlwkeeblehawson.co.uk.

Children of Divorce – When a Child Becomes the Caregiver after Divorce or Separation

Soila Sindiyo
Parenting Practitioner
Founding Editor
The Divorce Magazine

I often say that it’s ok for your children to see you upset when going through divorce and separation.

It is important for them to know that you too are hurting because by knowing this and by showing your emotions, you are inadvertently giving them permission to feel the pain and hurt that the divorce process gives rise to and also just to show them that you are indeed human after all.

It’s usually very difficult for a child, especially a sensitive one, to watch his mother cry or father fall apart and not do anything about it or feel that they are somehow responsible for the sadness or breakdown.

They will very often do their best to rectify the situation by taking care of you, in the best way that they know; asking you if you’re all right, if they can get you something or do something to make you feel better.

This is a very normal reaction to a specific situation but allowing it to become the norm or to persist, you’re changing your child’s life trajectory.  

When a child become a caregiver they become your advisor, your mentor, the person looking after you.  This set-up is definitely not conducive to helping children cope with divorce.

When a parent makes a statement like, “I rely on Sophia to make me feel better.  She takes care of me. She’s the only one who understands me,” the first question that comes to my mind is, “And whom does Sophia turn to? What does Tom do with his own feelings and thoughts of fear, confusion and loss?

The answer to this is most likely that she suppresses them or blocks them because there is nowhere else to take them. There is no adult container for their adverse and undesirable thoughts and feelings. There is no outlet, no vent so how are they coping with divorce.

Your child’s role has changed.

“When a child turned caregiver tries to attend to her own needs and wishes, she feels guilty and undeserving…When a child forfeits her childhood and adolescence to take on responsibilities for a parent, her capacity to enjoy her life as a young person, develop close friendships and cultivate shared interests is sacrificed…it is an overburdening that seriously inhibits the child’s freedom to separate normally and to lead a healthy adolescence…”[1]

So, it is okay for your child to see you cry, be distressed and upset because fact is that the divorce process is a difficult journey for all to be on.

It is beneficial and advantageous for them to know that you are hurting too but, hard as it maybe, we need to continue being the parents and the adults in the room, the container and processor of your child’s feelings of anxiety, fear and confusion in seeing the family unit he once knew disintegrate into something unfamiliar and foreign.

[1] Wallerstein, J., Lewis, J., and Blakeslee, S.,(2002), ‘The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce: A 25 Year Landmark Study.’

child is hurting

Parenting after Separation – What to do when your Child is Hurting

I cannot tell you how many of my adult friends went through some truly traumatic experiences as children which they never told their parents about until much later, if at all.

Yet one thing almost every one of them has said at some point or other is that they’re surprised their parents never noticed the changes in their behaviour caused by their experience.

Truth be told, all children will experience some sort of distressful experience at some point or other.

Some will see their parents divorce or separate, some will lose a close friend or parent through various circumstances whereas some will be victims of bullying or witnesses to a traumatic event.

Whatever your child goes through, it’s important to acknowledge their feelings and answer their questions.  Children will ask about things they need and want to know and understand.  They seek clarification and explanation of what they don’t get.

As a parent or guardian, when your child is hurting:

• Are you able to feel what they may be experiencing including their emotional struggles?

• Do you listen to your child with empathy and compassion?

• Are you able to verbally acknowledge and validate their feelings of distress to them?

You may wonder why any of this is important to do.

Well, simply put, when you contain your children’s feelings and emotions they develop feelings of security and safety.  They learn how to trust their own feelings as opposed to doubt if what they’re feeling is right or justified and I’m sure you will agree that learning to trust your own feelings is one of the greatest qualities an adult can possess.

The thing is, if and when their feelings of hurt are not acknowledged and taken care of, not only will their ability to recover from this experience be impacted, but so will their development.

Saying things like, “I’m sorry it happened”, “It’s normal and ok to feel sad when things like these happen”, and “It’s ok to cry” can go a long way in helping them cope.

Remember, you can say this to infants too.  They may not respond as you would expect but that doesn’t mean they cannot hear you nor the concern and care in the tone of your voice. Talk to them.

Where feelings are persistently left unattended to or recognised, your child may instead learn to do the following as a means of coping:

  • stop or bury their own feelings
  • learn not to trust their own feelings
  • learn to introject or identify with other people’s feeling instead of their own which may in turn mean that the life choices that they end up making are based more on other people’s feelings and wishes as opposed to their own

When your child is hurting, they will show you, probably more than tell you. Changes in their actions, behaviours and temperament may be more visible indicators that there’s something wrong.  Ask them. Tell them that you have noticed there have been some changes in them.  Bring it out into the open.

They need to know that you know.  They need to know that you are aware and that you care. Ask them and take care of it for them.

Let me know how I can help – soila@parentinglives.co.uk

ABOUT SOILA

Soila is a Child Development Psychologist, accredited Triple P (Positive Parenting Program) parenting practitioner, Certified Trauma Specialist and trained Family Mediator.  She works in private practice mainly, but not exclusively, with families going through divorce and separation.

Soila is a member of Resolution and a graduate member of the British Psychological Society.

Soila is the founder of The Davis Centre and The Divorce Magazine.

/

A Father’s Thoughts for His Son on Divorce and Co-Parenting

Linda Simpson
Linda Simpson
Writer and Speaker

My good friend has kindly consented to sharing two journal entries from the years after his marriage breakdown.

He keeps this journal for his son to read as an adult.

As a renowned professional in his field, this piece is at one level a reflection on the impact of work/personal life balance and the price paid for fame.

At another level it demonstrates the difficult but vital role successful co-parenting plays in the aftermath of marriage breakdown. He reflects on his pain and sorrow. Infused in all of it is hope for the understanding and effort he and his former wife made to help their son navigate life after divorce.

May 2009

You are 11 and I’m 67.

The time that has passed has demonstrated, more than anything that your Mom’s and my life are so fundamentally different is so many ways that we could not possibly have predicted when you were born.

But one fact has not changed – how much I love and care about you.

Your Mom decided to leave me and move ahead on her own path in the fall of 2007.  She told me on Halloween night and we told you a couple of weeks later.

You were devastated.

Apparently, when this happened a year or so before to somebody you knew, your Mom had told you it would never happen to you.  That’s all you could say at first, “You promised me it would never happen to me!”

I felt your pain so strongly; I still do.

Your Mom took responsibility for the decision, but I know she worries that you will blame her or lose trust in the women who come into your life.

I know also that she would like me to share the blame and at some level I must; all relationships are about two people and their interactions.

The good thing is that we have maintained a positive relationship, especially as it affects you.

Your Mom didn’t move until after Christmas that year so that it would be as normal as possible for you.  We then went together to Mexico in February, again keeping life as normal as possible.

It has not been all smooth sailing of course, but we have held it together and it gets better as time goes by.

We share parenting without conflict and share special occasions, most recently Easter morning.  The first year was very hard on you with several breakdowns that made clear your pain and gave me such heartache.

I could only hold you and share the pain.  That may never leave you, but you seem much better lately.

I’ve been thinking a lot about what I wrote above in comparison to what I had written a few years ago.  Then I strongly cautioned that we must put family and relationships first, listening and taking to heart what the women in our lives say.

Did I fail that badly?  The question comes up right now because I have a girlfriend. She never had children and so can’t readily understand the fact that you come first, and my time for her is partly dependent on what is going on here at the home front.

But I nevertheless find this a very hard question to answer right now, and it is probably one you will face sooner or later.

Anyway, it all seemed so clear a few years ago, but now I’m not so sure about a lot of things to do with relationships.  I think part of the problem is that our society today is so oriented to acquiring things, doing things, and succeeding in a very complex, frantic world.

Add to that the shifting understanding of the relative roles of men and women and the desire of women to have equal opportunity and pursue equally fulfilling careers, and we end up with patterns of living that run counter to our root, biological patterns.

Read a little anthropology and you will see what I’m getting at and how the world began to change about three centuries ago with the introduction of money economies and trade.

I’m digressing, but the point is that neither men nor women can really do it all, all the time.

Could I have kept a home office instead of renting one near the canal when you were two, traveled less and devoted less time to work, and still have provided the income to buy things, go places and do what we all seemed to want?  I doubt it.

Today I earn more than I did at the normal peak of a career because I work hard and give work a high priority.

Don’t misunderstand me — I like the applause and prominence that I enjoy right now.   But I don’t like what it seems to have meant for us as a family.

And when I look at our society and the rate of family fracturing and divorce, I have to ask if this is not also a root cause for so many; that, along with the modern idea that we are owed happiness, with happiness (whatever that is) taking precedence over responsibility.

June 2009

I’m now sitting in the airport waiting for delayed flights after two long, intense days of meetings.

When I had to break off above, I was struggling with the idea of what exactly we can do to meet expectations in a relationship and still meet the expectations of those who hire and pay or depend on us for their jobs and incomes.  I don’t think I know an answer.

As I said the last time, I don’t know the answer to the question of how to neatly package work and home and meet the expectations of people in both worlds.

But don’t kid yourself, you can’t have a job and also have everything else you might want.

You are used to getting pretty much everything you want or need, within reason; certainly more than I ever got because we were very, very poor.

We didn’t even have running water in our little country house when I was in Grade 7/8 and high school.

Compromise may be the answer, and we each have to decide where and how to compromise.  On several occasions you have said that you do not want fame, but you do want to be rich.  Those two often go together, so I’ll be interested to see how it works out.

None of the above denies the importance of our relationships and of family, but it isn’t easy in our modern world and it seems to get harder.

As I mentioned above, I was supposed to speak this morning in New York and people were paying me to come.

When the flight was cancelled at about 7:20 pm and there was no way for me to get there, I hastily emailed the only people I had addresses for to let them know, hoping they would see the emails this morning and be ready when people showed up.

The thing is that all three of the people I emailed got back to me within two hours last night.  What are they doing looking at emails to do with work at that hour?

And that’s the point; it’s a call, text, email, never get out of contact world, and it takes a toll on us as humans, on our families and our relationships.

ABOUT LINDA

A committed writer and speaker with stories to share based on many life lessons. I found a voice and style that matches my spirit. The hope is that these articles inspire reflection and conversation.

After a rewarding teaching career that spanned 40+ years, writing became my next step. Many years spent as a guidance education trainer gave me a unique perspective on the lives of children. Divorce twenty years ago provided first- hand knowledge of that life altering experience. As a very single parent, I am devoted to my wonderful family.

Every day I knock on the sky and believe impossible things before breakfast. It is all shared with the reader.

How to Deal with Lies

How to Deal with Lies your Ex Feeds your Child – Part 2

Ruth A. S. Nichols, M.A., M.A., CFLE p (Certified Family Life Educator, provisional)

Based on the illusory truth effect your child is now a target of abuse.

As a parent you are deprived of doing what you really want to do: Parent your child!

You need to speak up. How do you respond?

What you want to say involves engaging in a barrage of of accusatory and condescending remarks. Words exchanged will mimic previous conversations of which there was no resolve.

We can safely assume no new information will emerge from this interaction leading to the conclusion that a different option may be more productive.

What you could say offers a flimsy and sarcastic response. At least you replied without going on a ranting diatribe. Right?

What you should say means responding as a caring, loving, safeguarding and responsible parent.

Why should the targeted parent choose a cordial and non-confrontational method?

Seemingly, the only thing worse than one parent chirping in the child’s ear is two parents coming from both sides saying how they should act, feel and think.

Simply put, someone needs to be the parent!

Here are three common scenarios using illusory truth effect and possible responses:

1) “Your parent has not called. Your parent does not want to talk to child. Your parent would rather do anything than call child”.

Truth: Targeted parents’ calls go unanswered, told ‘child is busy’ or messages are not relayed.

What the targeted parent wants to say: You want to think your co-parent will honor your child’s relationship with both parents. And, complying with court orders is a logical assumption. Correct?

What this does: Continues the confrontational aggression and blame dynamics. Undoubtedly, a rerun will not yield different results.

What the targeted parent could say:” I did call you. Your parent is just telling you that. Here is the phone bill-see? Look at how many times I called you”.

What this does: Divorce is between the parents-about the child! Involving your child will not address the problem. Showing the phone bill is may not be the best option for two reasons.

First, the child truly believes the words of their other parent. Reiterating your beliefs onto them insinuates the child is wrong.  Their other parent is already making efforts to sway them against you.

Two, phone bills are not for children. In essence, this response perpetuates the arguing by creating drama at the expense of your child.

What the targeted parent should say: “That must be hurtful to think I did not call you.  I am not sure why your parent would say that. That is not what happened although I understand you think I did not call you.  I absolutely love talking with you and always look forward to hearing about what you are doing and what is happening in your life. You can call me at anytime. I am always excited to talk to you. I am always available to you.”

What this does: Demonstrates empathy and concern for what your child is experiencing. Remember, their other parent, who they also love and trust is telling them something else, albeit a lie. Because of the illusory truth effect even if your child knows a fact to be true or not true, in hearing the fact over and over again they begin to see the untrue fact as the truth. Imagine how confusing this must be for them. Which parent do they listen to?

2) “Your parent does not love you.  If they really did care they would ____.”

Truth:  Targeted parents love their child and miss their child very much. (Not to mention that a parent telling their own child such a complete and utter lie is horrible.)

 What the targeted parent wants to say: Engage in a repetitive conversation filled with accusations and name calling of which no new information will emerge.

What this does: Arguing will not improve this situation. Some parents will never grasp the immediate or long-term ramifications of their words.

What the targeted parent could say: “That is crazy. Of course I care about you.  I love you!”

What this does: An abrupt and incomplete response does not address the issue or offer empathy.

What the targeted parent should say: “That must have been confusing to hear. There is nothing farther from the truth, I love you very much. We both love you. Your parent and I are divorced and living in different homes and that has nothing to do with our love for you. I know that you love both of us.  I am not sure why your parent would say that. I love you more than anything and I will always be here for you.”

What this does: Honoring their feelings validates their experience. Remaining calm, confident and steadfast is key. This is an opportunity to connect with your child and inquire about their emotions.

3) “The reason we are divorced is because your parent _____.   If your parent wanted us to be happy they would ____. What is wrong with your parent?”

Truth: One parent is attempting to undermine their child’s relationship with the targeted parent: a textbook case of emotional abuse.

 What the targeted parent wants to say: Set the record straight.

What this does: Combatting comments are a moot point. Parents who engage in these antics are not receptive to logic or reality.

What the targeted parent could say: “Your parent is the one who left us.  I am not the one who _____.  Your parent is out of control.”

What this does: Escalates confusion and prolongs the feuding.

What the targeted parent should say: “That must be confusing and scary for you. I am glad you shared that with me. I am sorry you had to hear the unkind words. I wish your parent would not discuss adult matters with you. Sometimes people say things that are not true. Your parent and I clash on a few things; however, the one thing we both agree on is how much we love you. Is there anything else bothering you that you would like to talk about? I want you to know that you can talk to me about anything. I will always be here for you.”

What this does: Acknowledges their experience in hearing bitter words about a parent they also love. Validating their thoughts demonstrates regard and respect. This opens the door for asking about their feelings and learning what may be causing anxiety, emotional pain or stress. Focusing on the child’s anger and hurt feelings is more important than proving their other parent wrong.

Regardless of the game playing how you respond to the accusations and name calling will make a difference to your child.

Will this happen immediately? Probably not. Eventually, your child will reject the overbearing and toxic environment.  Overtime your child will come to know the truth and see you as a calm, consistently caring, and thoughtful parent who offers a kind, loving and peaceful home.

Responding in an attentive, loyal and responsible manner allows you to do what you really want: Parent your child!

Part 1 explains the Truth vs. the Illusory truth. – Divorce Lies and the Impact on your child

References:

www.sciencedirect.com

www.businessinsider.com

www.theacorn.com

metro.co.uk

ABOUT RUTH

Ruth is a Certified Family Life Educator and advocate for SharedParenting.  She works in the arena of Shared Parenting focusing on the parent/child relationship in the divorce process.

Ruth actively participates in establishing equal parenting in custody and divorce. She has authored several articles on divorce, Family Court and Shared Parenting and is a contributor at the Huffington Post. She manages 3 sites directed toward the shared parenting arena and created a survey evaluating parents’ experience in Family Court.

LIKE on: Facebook.com/SharedParentingConfessional

Research and information offered to enhance the parent-child relationship.    SharedParentingInfo.com