Solicitor
Roythornes Solicitors
A few months after a “kiss-cam” moment at a Coldplay concert shook the internet, the ripples are still being felt, both in headlines and potentially in courtrooms. A viral clip showed a well-known tech CEO embracing someone other than his wife, namely the company’s HR manager, sparking widespread speculation about personal and professional fallout.
Consequences of such affairs can carry several after-effects, legal ones too. Yet while the scandal dominates the public imagination, the law around adultery and divorce can tell a far more restrained story.
What counts as adultery in law?
In everyday conversation, ‘cheating’ can be synonymous with everything from text messages to emotional betrayal. English law, however, draws the line more narrowly. Legally, adultery is defined as sexual intercourse between a married person and someone who is not their spouse. Acts short of this – however damaging they may be to trust within a relationship – do not qualify as adultery under the law.
That legal definition often surprises those who expect the courts to reflect the moral weight of infidelity. But the direction of travel in family law has been clear: away from blame and toward resolution.
No-fault divorce and the end of ‘blame’
In April 2022, the ‘no-fault divorce’ has entered the legal terrain. Previously, adultery could be pleaded as a ground for divorce, and while rarely contested, it kept the language of fault alive in petitions. Now, all that is required is a simple statement that the marriage has broken down irretrievably. No proof, no reason, no explanation and certainly no tabloid-worthy evidence are required.
The reform was designed to lower the temperature. By removing the need to point fingers, it gives separating couples a greater chance to part amicably, without animosity. For those experiencing betrayal, this can feel rather unsatisfying. The law no longer distinguishes between a relationship that ends quietly and one that explodes on unruliness.
High-profile divorce vs everyday divorce
The distinction, however, lies not in the courts but in the court of public opinion. For the average couple, an affair can be a painful yet private devastation, handled quietly within the family. For celebrities or business leaders, it becomes a defining story for their public image, highly scrutinised by the press, shareholders and the public alike.
Legally, however, both divorces follow the same process. A Hollywood actor’s affair may fill column inches, but when it comes before a judge, the legal questions are identical to those facing any other couple: how to divide assets fairly and, where children are involved, how to ensure their wellbeing and welfare are looked after.
Does adultery change financial settlements?
Contrary to common belief, adultery has almost no bearing on how finances are settled in divorce. The guiding principle for the courts is need: ensuring both parties, and any children, are adequately provided for. Being unfaithful does not diminish one’s entitlement to a fair division of assets.
There are exceptions, but they are rare. If, for instance, one spouse has channelled marital funds extravagantly into conducting an affair – where examples can include luxury holidays, gifts or property purchases – that reckless spending could be raised. Even then, it requires strong evidence and is unlikely to tip the scales dramatically.
What about the children?
In cases where children are involved, the law is even clearer. The paramount concern of the courts is the welfare of the child. Adultery, in and of itself, is not considered a reason to limit contact between parent and child. Only where a parent’s new relationship puts the child at risk – for example, if it involves unsafe environments – would the court intervene.
This principle reflects a broader truth: children’s wellbeing should not become collateral damage in their parents’ disputes. While one parent’s anger or sense of betrayal may be real and raw, arrangements for children must rise above any animosity.
Beyond scandal: a system built on resolution
Public scandals remind us of how messy human relationships can be. But divorce law in England and Wales has shifted decisively away from punishing misconduct and toward managing outcomes. The aim is to provide a supportive framework for families in transition, not to mete out moral judgment.
For those navigating the end of a marriage – whether quietly or under the glare of cameras – the same structures apply. Infidelity may devastate trust and reshape lives, but in the eyes of the law, it is no longer a decisive factor. What matters most is fairness, respective needs and the ongoing wellbeing of any children.
And while no court can resolve the hurt of betrayal, the system is designed to give couples the tools to move forward – with as little hostility as possible, even in situations when the world might be watching.
Read more articles by Roythornes Solicitors.
About Ellen Nicholas
Ellen is a Solicitor in our Family Team at Roythornes Solicitors. She is passionate about assisting and supporting clients through challenging times in their lives. Her dedication and expertise ensure that clients receive clear, compassionate, and effective legal support tailored to their individual circumstances.
You might be interested in
The first of such men was a restaurant owner. I often frequented this restaurant alone and before long he noticed me and started offering me ‘free’ lunches. We would talk for ages and eventually one thing led to another. Had I known that was just the beginning of my adulterous lifestyle, I would have told my husband and I don’t know what else.
It was not until I left the country and wrote letters to those left behind did they begin to see and understand what was going on in my sad “marriage” and that those affairs did eventually help me leave.