mediation - Page 17

262 result(s) found.

celebrity spilts

Celebrity Splits or Anonymous Divorces? – How Best to Help Children Through it

Vanessa Fox Partner and Head of Family Law hlw Keeble Hawson
Vanessa Fox
Partner and Head of
Family Law
hlw Keeble Hawson

It is surprising that couples as wealthy as Amber Heard and Johnny Depp and now Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie wash their linen so publicly, when financially they are in a position not to do so.

Their motives may perhaps lie with a need to respond to the media circus that surrounds them – seeking to gain the public’s sympathy for their individual position – something the rest of us mere mortals can be grateful to avoid.

With that in mind, media speculation over a potential court battle over Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s six children – aged between 8 and 15 and, on any view, the innocent bystanders – is extremely worrying.

It is reported that Ms Jolie has instructed a lawyer well known for litigious work. However, it is to be hoped that the celebrity couple’s legal teams will advise them that there are other routes to achieving agreement that would prioritise their children’s needs.

For their children’s sake, any parents during separation, should act responsibly and avoid a bloodbath of litigation – which comes with the danger of distressing any young family members immensely. With celebrity couples, any litigation appears to be conducted in the public eye, with media comment at every stage.

Where there are children to consider, especially across a wide age range, separating parents should think carefully as to the legal path they take upon separation, as this will affect the children greatly. The legal recommendation to separating parents should be that a court appearance about children issues should be the last resort.

Although there are cases where a court application is the only option, parents should be advised to look at other choices, including mediation, counselling and collaborative family law practice. If parents can sit in a room together (whether with mediators or trained family lawyers) and listen to each other, they often realise that more unites than divides them where the children are concerned.

On a practical level, it is vital that children are helped to get through their parents’ separation and divorce as sensitively as possible and with minimum disruption. To achieve this, I recommend a checklist of ten tips:

  • It is best if parents can sit down together to tell their children about a separation or divorce. If the conversations have to be separate, it’s important to agree what you will each say beforehand so that children have a consistent message. Keep explanations simple and try not to blame each other.
  • Put your children’s welfare, not your own, at the forefront of your mind and avoid unnecessary squabbles over trivial issues with the other parent where possible when the children are present. Try to look at each situation through your children’s eyes.
  • Try to be as fair and as flexible with the other parent as possible about children issues, whilst not messing each other around with last minute changes of plan. A routine is helpful for children, but it needn’t become a straitjacket.
  • Agree some parenting ground rules with your ex, but also try to fit in with some differences in approach, without compromising on issues that really matter to you.
  • Don’t get into a ‘blame game’ with the other parent and give each other as much notice as possible with any problems that will inevitably arise from time to time with contact issues. This will help the children understand that they need to see both parents.
  • Reassure your children that you love them and that they are not to blame. Always remember that children are entitled to continue to love both their parents.
  • Explain in simple terms how their lives will change, particularly major decisions such as where they will live and how often they will see each parent. Be prepared to consider changes to the routine you have agreed with your ex if your children want to change the arrangements – and be particularly flexible with teenagers.
  • Listen to your children and make time for them, giving them your full attention – and turn off mobile phones when you spend time with them. Don’t force your child to talk to you, but reassure him or her that you are there to listen when they are ready.
  • Keep your own personal issues and feelings about the separation out of any discussions with your children and focus on how they are each feeling.
  • Try to counter the negative impact of separation or divorce with positive statements about the children such as praising them for achievements at school or helping around the home.

About Vanessa

hlw Keeble Hawson partner, Vanessa Fox, marks 25 years as head of the firm’s family law department in 2016.

Collaboratively trained and a qualified mediator, she has modernised South Yorkshire Resolution since becoming chair in 2013 and is also a member of the Law Society’s Family Law Panel and the Children Panel.

She can be contacted at on 0114 290 6232 or on vanessafox@hlwkeeblehawson.co.uk.

Borderline Personality Disorder

Coping with Divorcing a Person with Borderline Personality Disorder

Women and Divorce
Wendi Schuller
Author of
The Global Guide to Divorce

Mediation and collaborative divorces have been referred to as “more friendly” with a goal to keep the door open to having a relationship post-divorce.

Some people who divorced individuals with personality disorders, felt safer in the court room with a judge presiding.

This is particularly true with spouses who have Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD).

People with BPD have a fear of abandonment which can become worse with divorce. They have poor and unstable interpersonal relationships. They tend to put someone up on a pedestal and revere them.

When that person does something not liked, they become bitterly despised. People are categorized as being wonderful or not worthy of their adoration.

Folks with BPD have overly intense emotions which fluctuate vastly. They are controlling and this includes controlling communication between people they know. BPD people are threatened by a partner’s success so criticize in order to tear them down in the belief it will keep them dependent and prevent abandonment (divorce).

Their impulsive behaviour – affairs, drug use, and alcoholism may be a factor in their partner wanting out of the relationship.

People with BPD have a sense of emptiness with a distorted self-image. When married, one may have tip-toed around them to avoid activating the BPD spouse’s intense anger. The departing spouse’s self-esteem may be low after spending time with this judgemental person.

Ways to get through divorce from a spouse with Borderline Personality Disorder include having clear boundaries. You can send a strong message that all communication goes to your solicitor and not to you.  Have consequences if boundaries are violated.

coping with divorcing Borderline Personality DisorderFollow through with consequences, such as blocking their calls and e-mails or changing your phone number. Instruct staff at work not to put those calls through to you or get a restraining order.

One has to get grounded when starting divorce. Get calm in order to stay focused, as the spouse with BPD will attempt to raise your anxiety.

Do not rise to the bait or react to their ploys. Let your barrister or solicitor be the filter that keeps manipulation away from you and deals with it impassively. They get in power struggles even over little issues, so do not get in a battle.

Several men I interviewed advised others to let the spouse with BPD feel that they are winning, by giving up more personal property and instead concentrate on the big ticket items. Turn over meticulous documents on finances, particularly showing what you owned before marriage, to keep emotion out of the dealings.

Spouses with Borderline Personality Disorder can bump up your legal costs by dragging out the divorce proceedings. They may refuse to hand over personal property that is deemed yours.

Some solicitors send a paralegal to oversee the actual packing up of their client’s personal property. This prevents any interactions of their client with the spouse with BPD. They may try to hang on to you by throwing a spanner in the works whenever possible such as by causing delays with submitting needed records. Leave emotion out and keep to your boundaries.

When there are children in the marriage, safeguards need to be put into place. Kids can be used as pawns to punish the spouse who is departing.

Careful documentation is helpful to show neglect, parental alienation or other parenting problems. There may be a formal custody evaluation performed with interviewing other adults in the kids’ lives to determine the percentage of shared care for each parent.

Post-divorce, keep records of communication from the parent with BPD. A person with BPD may be mandated to get therapy and can turn their lives around. People who put the effort into therapy can be good parents and marriage partners.

Divorce with spouses with Borderline Personality Disorder who are not in treatment, can a nightmare. Ask potential divorce professionals if they are experienced in dealing with this type of person and what type of divorce that they recommend.

The people I talked with had Clean Breaks with former partners with Borderline Personality Disorder and had no communication with them afterwards.

About Wendi

Wendi Schuller is a nurse, hypnotherapist and is certified in Neuro-linguistic Programing (NLP).

Her most recent book is The Global Guide to Divorce and she has over 200 published articles.

She is a guest on radio programs in the US and UK. Her website is globalguidetodivorce.com.

Do Grandparents have Rights?

Kimberley-Bailey
Kimberley Bailey
Divorce and Family Solicitor

Grandparents usually have a positive influential role to play in the lives of their grandchildren; teaching them things their parents can’t from the generation before, helping children understand the dynamics of their family history, as well as the fun stuff of baking or playing with train sets.

Sadly, where there has been the tragic loss of a parent or following an acrimonious divorce or relationship breakdown, grandparents may be pushed out, losing contact with their grandchildren, sometimes quite to the detriment of the child.

So, what options are open to a grandparent in this situation?

Mediate to find a solution

Family mediation could have an important role to play here as a means of attempting to resolve disputes between grandparents and parents.

It provides a space where the families can communicate albeit via a third party. However, unless the parent(s) will engage in mediation, or the process of mediation breaks down without agreement grandparents are faced with the daunting prospect of having to seek the permission of the court even to apply to see their grandchildren.

Apply for permission from the courts

As unbelievable as it may seem grandparents have no automatic right to ask the Courts to help them, save for some exceptional circumstances, and so must apply for permission to make their application. Of course, before making their application they must decide what exactly they are applying for.

do grandparents have rightsIs it a Child Arrangements Order to have defined times when they see their grandchildren?  Or is it that the child should live with them given the change of circumstances, in which case should the application be for residence or a special guardianship order?  In my experience the difference isn’t always understood when I speak with grandparents wanting to go to Court.

Obtain a court order

A residence order would make the successful applicant the main carer for the child and give them Parental Responsibility shared with any parent who already has parental responsibility.  It would likely also set out when the child should spend time with their parents or other carers involved.

A Special Guardianship Order can secure the child’s long-term placement and give the Special Guardian Parental Responsibility as well as setting out arrangements to maintain the child’s links with his or her parent(s) but it also gives additional “powers” to the Special Guardian. It can for example give them control on a day to day basis of how the parents’ exercise parental responsibility

An application for a Special Guardianship Order must be supported by social services who will be asked to undertake a report during proceedings on the suitability of the applicant(s) and any other relevant matters.

It’s not easy for grandparents

The situation of grandparents is not enviable there is no longer Legal Aid to cover the legal costs in most cases and social services will only sometimes propose to assist with costs where they are encouraging the grandparents to bring proceedings rather than the child having to be placed in care.

The additional hurdle faced by grandparents – that they have to ask the Court for permission before they can make an application for a Court Order – creates a perceived barrier and indisputably increases the time and cost of proceedings.

But, I have worked with a number of grandparents, helping them to re-establish contact with their grandchildren, and they tell me it’s all worth it in the end.

Guest post written by Kimberely Bailey of Woolley & Co. Solicitors, originally published here 

why you need a financial order
/

They Think It’s All Over …  Actually, No It Isn’t or Why you Need a Financial Order on your Divorce

Karen Wallace
Karen Wallace
Head of Family Department
Stafford Young Jones

The Minister says to the Groom/Bride:

 N, will you take N to be your wife/husband?

Will you love her/him, comfort her/him, honour and protect her/him and, forsaking all others, be faithful to her/him as long as you both shall live? (The Marriage Service  © The Archbishop’s Council 2016)

Many of us will be familiar with these words from the traditional church wedding service.

When we say “I will” in response, and then go on to make the traditional vows about having and holding, for better, for worse, for richer, for poorer and so on, most people don’t realise that they are also saying, and under the Matrimonial Causes Act, if we get divorced we are obligated to continue to financially support each other and can make claims against each other for capital, income and pensions at any time until the court says those claims are dismissed.

It’s not as romantic as, ‘til death us do part, but I wonder how much grief would be saved if people understood that they are both taking on these responsibilities when those vows are made?

Those claims, for capital, income and pensions, relate to the assets that have been built up during the marriage as a result of contributions both people made to the relationship.

The courts don’t discriminate between types of contribution so a wife who has stayed home to raise the children has contributed as much as a husband who went out to work and earned the money to pay the mortgage.  But what I am concerned with here are the words “until the court says those claims are dismissed.”

If you are divorcing right now you may find that there are complicated issues to resolve about finances – who is to get what out of the house, what happens about pensions, the division of a business.

If you have a lawyer advising you and you reach an agreement with your ex, it will be strongly recommended that a Financial Remedy Order (“FRO”) is drawn up.  In these circumstances it will be applied for by consent, so these orders are often called “consent orders”.

If you go to court and a judge decides it all for you, you will get a FRO automatically as part of the decision process.

All FROs, made by consent or otherwise, are made by judges, so that they are binding and enforceable, meaning that if either of you try to go back on the deal, the other can go back to court and make you do what you are supposed to.  They always include “dismissal clauses”, which explicitly say that neither of you can claim anything else from the other in the future.

why you need a financial order
What if you don’t really have any assets to divide

But what if you reach agreement with your ex by some other route, such as mediation?  Or what if you don’t really have any assets to divide, or you sort it all out between you and there is no hassle about anything?  Surely the decree absolute will take care of it?  You don’t need to go to the bother of getting a FRO then, do you?

Well yes, actually, you do.  Getting your decree absolute only confirms that you are divorced.  Those claims for capital, income and pensions don’t go away until a judge specifically says they do.  If you marry again then you can’t make claims – but if your ex doesn’t remarry they can still claim from you at any time in the future – unless and until a judge has said they can’t.

You might think that you don’t have very much and you will probably carry on not having very much, and neither will your ex, but what happens if they fall ill or have an accident and can’t work anymore, so have even less than they do now, or you win the Lottery?  Those sorts of circumstances throw a whole new light on it, and suddenly, even years later, you could find yourself facing a claim.

That’s exactly what happened in the case of Wyatt v Vince [2016] EWHC 1368 (FAM).

The case made the headlines a year or two ago when Mr Vince tried to say that Ms Wyatt wasn’t entitled to make a claim because of a 19 year delay, but the Supreme Court said that she could.

Her claim has recently been resolved by agreement and she was awarded £300,000 plus some money towards the costs of the Supreme Court hearings.  The judge approving their agreement said he was satisfied that it was reasonable for Ms Wyatt to receive a modest award following the breakdown of the marriage.

I expect you are wondering why she waited so long to make her claim.  Well, they married in 1981 and had one child.  They separated in 1984 and divorced in 1992.

During the marriage they lived a New Age traveller lifestyle; after they separated Mr Vince continued living as a traveller for several years; Ms Wyatt also lived as a traveller with their child, and in homeless shelters and eventually in a council property.  A classic case of a couple with not very much at all who probably saw no reason to go to the trouble and expense of getting a FRO.

What changed was that years later Mr Vince became a highly successful green energy tycoon worth £57m, while Ms Wyatt continued to live in her council property, suffering with various health problems.

The amount they eventually agreed she should receive was only about 0.05% of his overall wealth, and her claim was an uphill struggle; but nevertheless she still got something, over 19 years after they divorced, when it could never be said that she had made even the slightest contribution to the assets Mr Vince had built up.

And it was all because they never asked a judge to dismiss their claims against each other when they got divorced.  A great opportunity for Ms Wyatt, not so much for Mr Vince who, as you might imagine, is a bit cross about it all.

So that is why lawyers recommend that you have a FRO dismissing all claims, so that you both have the certainty for the future that neither of you can bring any claims against the other in later years.

A FRO means that the agreement you have reached is binding: neither of you can go back on any deal you may have made in mediation; and neither of you can go back on a promise between the two of you to leave each other’s finances alone.

FROs are bespoke technical documents that are tailored to your individual circumstances, and usually you will need a lawyer to write it up for you.  But if your circumstances change later in life and you hit a jackpot, you may find that it was a very worthwhile investment – and it really will all be over.

divorce lawyer
/

How To Spot A Divorce Lawyer Who Is Getting More Out Of Your Divorce Than You Are

Karen Wallace
Karen Wallace
Head of Family Department
Stafford Young Jones

“For the [guild of lawyers], their work is very much what it is for all lawyers, which is to say, doing things slowly for a lot of money“ – Terry Pratchett

Let’s face it, lawyers have a bad reputation.  They are pedantic, argumentative, use ten words when two will do, and they charge a fortune – and that’s the good ones!

The trouble is that lawyers know that the devil is in the detail – cases are won and lost on the interpretation of words, and a big feature of the law is how it is interpreted.

They know that if they get this wrong, or miss a crucial point, they can be sued, and rightly so.  One reason lawyers charge the fees they do is because of their massive insurance premiums.

I’ll let you into a secret – the reason lawyers are so cautious is because they are terrified of being sued.  So while they want to give you a good service, they also go to great lengths to avoid a law suit.  Even the wording I am using in this article has to be carefully considered because of a reference to a real case.

Family lawyers are no different.  In some respects they are worse because the work they do is personal and packed full of emotion – people who are divorcing are fragile and emotional – and the outcome they get for their clients will impact the rest of their lives.  So there is a lot at stake.  Emotional fragile people who don’t get what they want are likely to sue, or at least complain.

Human nature being what it is, just as probate lawyers are happy when there’s a cold winter, certain family lawyers can be happy when they meet one half of a warring couple because they see an opportunity to make money.

Family law is undergoing massive changes.

The focus on mediation, trying to get families to sort out their issues without going to court, means that family law is not as lucrative as it used to be, and yet, lawyers still need to perform and meet their billing targets.

As a member of Resolution I am firmly committed to doing all I can to take the heat out of the situation so that even if a court hearing is needed the process is still polite, respectful and as amicable as possible.  But sadly there are some lawyers who see a warring couple and take the opportunity to up the ante, inflame a bad situation to make it worse –  so that they can make more money.

I came across a very blatant example of this recently.  I was consulted by a wife who had been separated from her husband for a number of years.  He had been working abroad and so saw his children only sporadically – but they had been able to make those arrangements themselves with no problem.

He had recently lost his job so had returned to the UK and now wanted to establish a more stable, fortnightly contact regime with two children who are pre- and mid-teens.  I was contacted by his lawyer about specific contact arrangements, intent on convincing me that my client was refusing contact.  This was far from the case.  My client was willing to encourage whatever contact the children wanted, but she knew that, given their own activities, social lives and opinions, they were only going to want to see him about once a month.

divorce lawyer
Is your divorce lawyer not listening?

It would have been the easiest thing in the world for me to have responded in kind, but I resisted the temptation.

I told the lawyer that this was not a discussion for us to be having.  This was not a newly separated couple who were so highly conflicted that they needed their lawyers to micromanage their contact arrangements.  These were not children who were so young that they couldn’t decide for or speak for themselves.

I made it clear that I was not going to get involved in protracted correspondence when this couple were perfectly capable of speaking to each other and to the children to sort it all out for themselves.

In relation to financial issues, this same couple have already done their basic deal.  She has capital, he has pensions: no further intervention is needed, and they are both happy with that arrangement.  Yet this lawyer was still suggesting full disclosure when all they need is a simple order that says neither person can make a claim against the other in the future.

Because I too am cautious, I have asked my client to sign a disclaimer confirming that she understands that as there has been no disclosure I have not been able to advise her on whether the agreement they have reached is fair, and that she understands that if she later finds out he had assets she didn’t know about, she can’t make a claim against them.

She is happy to sign this because she knows he doesn’t have anything else and even if he did, she doesn’t want it.  But again it would have been very easy to agree that full disclosure was required, just to check, and let’s take a few months over it and write some expensive snotty letters in the meantime.

This strikes me as a classic case of a lawyer trying to get more out of their client’s divorce than the client is getting.

How can you tell if that is happening to you?  Well, here are some things to look for:

  • Are you being asked to produce all of your bank statements and documents even though you know all about your ex’s finances and have reached a deal you are happy with?
  • Is your lawyer insisting on fighting small points you don’t really care about?
  • Is your lawyer telling you not to speak to your ex even though both of you are quite comfortable doing so?
  • Are you being encouraged to start court proceedings when you still want to try to negotiate?
  • Is your lawyer not listening to you?

As with anything in life, listen to your gut.  If something doesn’t feel right, it probably isn’t.  If you are being advised to do something you are uncomfortable with, don’t do it.

A fundamental rule of the solicitor/client relationship is that the lawyer advises, you instruct.  In other words the lawyer is there to do what you want them to do, having first explained the law and the legal repercussions of whatever options may be available to you so that you can make an informed decision.

Divorce is a stressful time.  Sometimes you need someone to be a buffer between you and your ex because you simply can’t handle them anymore.

Lawyers are great for that, but it is important to remember that it is your agenda, not the lawyer’s, and if you are finding that your agenda has fallen by the wayside, don’t be afraid to say, ‘thank you but goodbye’, and find someone else who will put your needs, and your pocket, first.

About Karen

Karen Wallace qualified as a solicitor in 1993 and has practiced Family Law throughout her career, initially as part of a general litigation practice and then specialising from 2004. 

As a divorced parent she has considerable insight into the issues faced by divorcing couples.  Karen uses this insight to help a wide range of families successfully through the legal maze of divorce with as little expense and trauma as possible – www.syjlaw.co.uk

 wallacek@syjlaw.co.uk

/

Divorce and The Myth of Justice in Family Justice

Johnathan Pease Accredited Family Mediator and PPC
Johnathan Pease
Accredited Family Mediator
and PPC

The myth of justice in Family Justice.

This is a pretty bold title. Am I, as a mere Family Mediation Council Accredited (FMCA) mediator really challenging the idea that the Family Justice system has anything at all to do with meting out justice?  Yes, I am.

It is almost a daily occurrence as a FMCA mediator to hear about someone ‘s feelings of being unfairly treated by their ex-partner.

Sometimes, clients tell me of how hard they’ve worked, or how they’ve given their ex the best years of their life, only to now find themselves replaced by a wealthier or younger model.

Other times it describes the way a non-resident parent feels about how difficult it is to see their children and how they are being blocked by an obstructive ex-partner. In yet other instances it describes a deeply held belief in what they see as their moral right to a certain share of a family asset pot – either because they feel they were the one who worked so hard for it, or because they feel as it is their spouse who wants to end the marriage, why should they lose out?

In almost all cases, there is a belief that if a judge or other authority could only hear about these personal injustices that this court or authority will see the truth, make a judgement and put things right. Unfortunately, this is simply not the case.

The family court system does not in any way concern itself with personal, relational issues. It is only concerned with those elements of the Matrimonial Causes Act of 1973 (and the few amendments since) that apply. In essence, these are to do with the assurance that children are kept safe, are housed and to the greatest degree possible continue to have two parents who can, and will support them.

The Court will also want to ensure that both parties have provided full and frank financial disclosure so that there is absolute clarity about the financial picture before making a decision. If couples go to final hearing and the Court is asked to make a judgment on their behalf, effectively telling them how things will be split, no amount of emotional appeal will have an impact.

Judges will not concern themselves with the fact that your – now ex – partner promised to love you until the day they died but then reneged on that promise and has fallen in love with someone else. They will not punish your ex for lying to you about all those times they said they were playing golf or visiting a sick friend but were really with their lover. The incredibly frustrating and rather sad fact for many is that no amount of proof gathering, or case building will change this.

myth of family justiceThe traditional adversarial type of litigation is basically what we see in the Family Court system.

This has led to a system of “family justice” that for the average family it results in little more than seeing the children of their solicitor and barrister go to a great university. Fighting it out in court, hoping for a judge to see how awful your ex is, such that you are then provided with an award of most of the assets in retribution doesn’t really work.

Even in those rare cases where a judge is swayed by an argument, or where the judge does provide a partner or spouse with the lion’s share of the assets because he feels sorry for a spouse, the legal costs averaging £23,000 per person to receive that award usually completely wipes out any benefit you may have though you were getting (this is the average cost per person for a low to middle income family).

To top that off, as if this financial cost isn’t enough, a battle such as this will almost certainly impact the children and the love/respect they feel for you as parents.

I want to be completely clear on this point: a drawn out legal battle will affect the children’s opinion of BOTH parents.

Children do not simply side with judges, and punish the parent who loses in such a battle. They also have their opinions about the parent who destroyed their other parent in court. Remember, that no matter how much you dislike your ex, or feel they’ve lied or been unfair to you, to your children that person is still their father (or mother as the case may be). Your children are made up from the DNA of both of you.

Two years of hearing about how awful their other parent is (the average length of a family court case), means to put your children through 24 months of hearing that half of their genetic make-up is in some way flawed. Few children will thank you for that.

So where do people who feel they’ve been treated unfairly go? What can they do with these feelings? How can things be put right? These are difficult questions to answer properly in an article such as this.

Certainly, in terms of putting things right and ensuring that someone who has betrayed you is brought to justice, this might not be possible. If you are on the receiving end of something like this, it may well be that for you the only real recourse is to find the right support to help you through it. Wider families, support professionals such as counsellors or therapists and the love of close friends may be the thing that helps you get out the other side.

In regards to reaching a fair financial settlement and ensuring that any injustices that have occurred in the past are not allowed to continue, working with an accredited family mediator will save you a significant amount of time and money over the route of court and litigation.

Attend an initial information meeting with your local FMCA mediator about the options you have, and how mediation might be the thing to ensure that going forward, you are able to keep your savings, the respect of your children, and your own personal dignity.

About the Author

Johnathan Pease, of New Landscape Mediation, is a highly experienced family mediator with over 20 years of experience working in family conflict resolution both as a mediator and Family Consultant.

A fully accredited BACP psychotherapist, Johnathan holds several qualifications with ADRg – including Direct Child Consultant (DCC). He is an accredited Civil/Commercial mediator, a member of the UK College of Mediators, and an affiliate member of Resolution.

Johnathan’s flexible and pragmatic approach to mediation makes the most of his understanding of interpersonal dynamics for the benefit of all concerned.

As a father of 2 children, and having experienced a family breakdown himself, Johnathan recognises that there are often many layers to the end of a marriage hindering a successful settlement than first meets the eye. Johnathan applies his varied training and life experience to the time sensitive and practical needs of family mediation with consistent success.

/

What is the Role of the Family Mediator in Dealing with Indifference?

Paul Sandford
Paul Sandford – Civil Mediator and Tribunal Judge

“The opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference.”

This very insightful sentence, written by the renowned philosopher and academic, Elie Wiesel, essentially explains why so many partnerships and marriages flounder or fail.

In some instances, the split that is announced to friends comes as a surprise.  Neither they nor even the parties to the relationship themselves ever saw this coming.

After all the friends say, “neither of them of them was unfaithful and there was never any suggestion of abuse or nastiness”.

Some of these indifferent couples may get counselling or guidance but others may simply decide that enough is enough and take steps to formally terminate their relationship.

Some may end up in a room with a family mediator giving financial disclosure and discussing what arrangements should be made for their children. It may be that instead of one or either of the parties making what some would see as explicit or unrealistic demands, the mediator is confronted by a party who cannot be bothered.

An example of this would be one party not maintaining adequate levels of contact with the children of the relationship even where there is no objection to him or her doing so.

Family mediation is a voluntary as well as a flexible, confidential process that allows for the possibility of reconciliation.

In the course of separation one of the parties to a relationship, or indeed both, could decide to try and salvage the relationship. If they are in mediation their mediator will explain to them that they can either withdraw completely or else suspend the process for a fixed or even an indeterminate period. This might give them time to consider their options, possibly to try to regain what they once had and to  begin to build up trust in one another.

In these circumstances, is there a role for the mediator particularly as he or she must not adopt the mantle of counsellor or therapist?

 Role of the Family Mediator in Dealing with IndifferenceThe couple who are thinking of reconciling may either not go back to living with one another straightaway or have not yet reached the point that they feel able to discuss matters without some external input. If they decide to retain separate households, even in the short term, there may still be financial matters such as maintenance and child related issues such as contact to be resolved.

It might be that the initial split was caused by a couple’s disagreement about the best way to discipline and care for their children and they might benefit from the drawing up of a parenting plan.

Alternatively they may conceivably be in dispute about the running of a family business or the status of an extension built to accommodate a relative. One of the parties to the relationship may be in dire financial difficulty and irrespective of any wish to try and reconcile, may consider it necessary to take steps in order to protect him/herself and their children. Moreover, a couple’s therapist or counsellor may have advised that progress cannot be made until some legal issues are resolved and it well may be that skilful and timely input from a mediator saves the day.

In such cases, the family mediator has a vital role to play. He or she will very possibly change emphasis and no longer specifically use terms such as “divorce” or “clean break,” but the process of a mediator helping to facilitate an agreement may still be required.

What if it really is too late for a reconciliation and one or both parties simply decides that there is no point in considering reconciliation and opt to forge ahead?

In such circumstances, if the parties decide that that is what they want, the mediator may simply carry on with “plan A” and in the fullness of time a mutually acceptable settlement may be reached.

In the face of indifference from one or both parties part of the role of the family mediator is to accentuate the positives so as to help them to communicate better. In so doing the mediator will be able to help a couple to foster an improved level of trust that will enable them to reach an agreement and to behave towards each other in a more civilised manner.

Without this input which family mediators routinely provide and which helps disputing parties to overcome indifference in addition to  enmity or dislike, any negotiations or discussions may fail. If so there may be less likelihood of a divorced or separated couple communicating effectively with one another, perhaps for years to come.

About the Author

Paul Sandford ( http://www.albertsquaremediation.co.uk/ ) is an accredited civil mediator and Tribunal Judge. He is also an associate of a Birmingham-based firm of solicitors, My Business Counsel.

He mediates for a leading UK charity and has the benefit of having worked as a solicitor for around 25 years.  He has also worked as a trainer and university lecturer and has considerable experience of working with people who are disabled or who do not have English as a first language.

As well as being Regents University accredited, Paul recently completed ADRg civil/commercial and family training .

He has particular  knowledge and experience of housing, property/commercial, medical and public law issues and employment, workplace, family and educational disputes. He is a member of two mediation panels: Clerksroom, which has excellent conference call facilities, and the Business Mediation Group. In his spare time Paul enjoys cooking, football, test cricket and listening to the blues, and fundraises for his school.

FAMILY MEDIATION SERVICE

Going Through Divorce? What you Need to Know about Family Mediatiors

Johnathan Pease Accredited Family Mediator and PPC
Johnathan Pease
Accredited Family Mediator
and PPC

Surgeons, mediators and medicine men.

Whenever we hear these job titles, we have an immediate impression as to the type of person we’re speaking about.

Surgeons are seen as highly trained specialists we entrust with our lives.  Medicine men, on the other hand, are snake oil salesmeisters who dupe dim witted customers from a horse drawn wagon (or any home shopping channel) into buying worthless cures for baldness, arthritis and bad breath – often all at the same time!!!

But what about Mediators?

Even though, as a profession, mediation has been growing in the UK since the late ’70s, until recently it has largely fallen under the radar of the average citizen.  But things are changing and they’re changing quickly.

The effects of budget cuts on the Courts and Legal Aid notwithstanding, divorcing couples are simply less and less willing to add insult to the injury of the end of their marriage by squandering their life savings on lengthy legal battles.  So where  do these couples turn? A Family Mediation Council Accredited (FMCA) mediator is the professional alternative.

The Family Mediation Council (FMC) and mediators alike want to ensure that these separating families know that when choosing a mediator, they are turning to a solid, respected professionals and NOT  a Medicine Man.

The Family Mediation Council Accreditation (FMCA) scheme ensures that mediators holding FMCA status have not only completed the required training, but have gone on to substantially demonstrate a number of important competencies in actual practice whilst being supervised by a suitable qualified and registered Professional Practice Consultant (PPC).

These efforts are not just about changing public opinion however.  The FMC wants to ensure divorcing couples that when choosing an FMCA mediator, they are contracting a highly trained specialist who can be entrusted to help them work through their finances to reach a fair and equitable settlement solution, as well as helping them create workable co-parenting plans.

The gap between surgeons and mediators may never close fully, but the robust training and accreditation requirements of FMCA mediators mean that we are moving closer to surgeons every day.

About the Author

Johnathan Pease, of New Landscape Mediation, is a highly experienced family mediator with over 20 years of experience working in family conflict resolution both as a mediator and Family Consultant.

A fully accredited BACP psychotherapist, Johnathan holds several qualifications with ADRg – including Direct Child Consultant (DCC). He is an accredited Civil/Commercial mediator, a member of the UK College of Mediators, and an affiliate member of Resolution.

Johnathan’s flexible and pragmatic approach to mediation makes the most of his understanding of interpersonal dynamics for the benefit of all concerned.

As a father of 2 children, and having experienced a family breakdown himself, Johnathan recognises that there are often many layers to the end of a marriage hindering a successful settlement than first meets the eye. Johnathan applies his varied training and life experience to the time sensitive and practical needs of family mediation with consistent success.

MIAMs are Not the Way to Encourage Divorcing Couples to Mediate
/

MIAMs are Not the Way to Encourage Divorcing Couples to Mediate

Katie McCann
Katie McCann
Head of Family Law and in-house counsel at Kuits Solicitors

The Ministry of Justice recently published the Legal Aid Statistics for October to December 2015, which revealed that the number of Mediation Information and Assessment Meetings (MIAMs) have continued to decline and were down by 16% in the last quarter.

MIAMs were introduced in April 2011 and became compulsory for divorcing couples to attend in April 2014 before they’re granted permission for their matter to be progressed to court.

The aim of the meetings is to assess whether mediation is an appropriate way to resolve any issues and, ultimately, to try to avoid court proceedings.

The Advantages of Mediation

While mediation is not suitable for every case, it certainly has its benefits. Going to court may provide closure, but it puts decision-making in the hands of a judge. Mediation, on the other hand, provides the divorcing couple with far more control and allows them to work together to reach practical agreements.

Cooperating to reach conclusions leads to a far less hostile environment, where communication is encouraged and stress levels can be reduced.

Mediation also often allows for a far speedier process, which is significantly cheaper than litigation, and it can be especially useful when reaching decisions in relation to any children, where flexibility and compromise is vital.

Why aren’t MIAMs Leading to More Mediation?

Despite the above advantages, the introduction of compulsory MIAMs have not resulted in the desired increase in the use of mediation.

There are several reasons for this.

The first, quite correctly, is the existence of several exemptions that automatically permit non-attendance at a MIAM, based on the fact that mediation would be unsuitable for the couple in question.

MIAMs are Not the Way to Encourage Divorcing Couples to MediateLogical exceptions include situations where there has been an allegation of domestic violence in the last 12 months, where the whereabouts of one ex-spouse is unknown, or where any delay caused by attending a MIAM would cause significant harm to a child, a significant risk of a miscarriage of justice, or unreasonable hardship.

These exemptions, together with several others, are perfectly understandable and forcing such couples to attend mediation would be, at best, pointless and, at worst, unethical.

However on the other side, a MIAM form can be ‘signed-off’ if a session could not go ahead due to the non-attendance of one of the parties (without good reason). This option, which arguably reduces the process to a box-ticking exercise, seems to be counter-productive.

After all, MIAMs are either compulsory or they are not. Failure to show up should not be as accepted as a satisfactory excuse in the way it currently is.

Furthermore, even when separating couples willingly attend a MIAM, it only results in the use of mediation in less than a quarter of cases. For this reason the question must be asked, if compulsory MIAMs are not successfully encouraging the use of mediation as a method of alternative dispute resolution, then what will?

A Proposed Solution – Make Mediation Compulsory Instead

It seems that the obvious way to increase the use of mediation is to make mediation itself compulsory.

While this appears somewhat draconian at first glance, if approached sensibly it may have the desired outcome and inconvenience the parties no more than attending a MIAM currently does.

Firstly, it would be feasible to require compulsory attendance at a couple of mediation sessions, while retaining the exemptions that currently exist for MIAMs. The information that is currently provided at a MIAM could either be discussed at the beginning of the session or sent ahead in the post, with the mediation session highlighting the benefits that can be achieved.

After all, the best way to decide whether something will be a success is to try it out.

Those who oppose compulsory mediation will argue that it would be unfair to impose it on the unwilling couples who, to put it bluntly, cannot stand the sight of each other. It is important to remember however, that there is no need for such parties to even see each other at mediation – it can take place in separate rooms, with the mediator going in-between.

The compulsory nature of the first few sessions would also remove the need for one of the parties to suggest the use of mediation, putting the separating couple on an equal footing from the offset.

Compulsory mediation may not appeal to everyone, however the suggestion is born from the fact that couples are already being ‘forced’ to attend MIAMs, which are not obtaining the desired results.  The obligatory nature of this has already been established so extending this principle to require attendance at an actual mediation session would simply increase couples’ awareness of its benefits.

Let’s not forget, mandatory mediation would only be for couples who wish to proceed to court – those who are willing to negotiate by themselves, or through solicitors, would be left alone to do so.

But we think it’s time to face reality – MIAMs aren’t the best way to encourage mediation – mediation is the best way to encourage mediation.”

Katie McCann is head of family law and in-house counsel at Kuits Solicitors in Manchester City Centre. She has a special interest in resolving high value relationship breakdown disputes.

Bird’s Nest Custody – a New Approach to Joint Custody?

Kate Banerjee Partner and Head of the Children Department Jones Myers Family Law Solicitors
Kate Banerjee
Head of the Children Department
Jones Myers Family Law Solicitors

Touted as the smart new way to divorce by the media, ‘bird’s nest custody’ is becoming more common in the UK as rising numbers of British courts recommend shared parenting instead of sole custody for one of them.

Bird’s nest custody sees children stay in the family home, while their parents move in and out on an agreed schedule to look after them.

As well as the intended benefit of reducing stress and change for the youngsters, it can also be a cheaper solution for parents who might struggle to maintain their pre-divorce lifestyle.

Here, children would remain in the family home with one parent, while the other would live in a smaller flat, removing the need to provide two bedrooms for each child – complete with toys, fixtures and furniture at each place.

Parents can either swap between homes or stay with family and friends when their ex moves in.

To date, UK courts have not forced bird’s nesting onto anyone; however couples are coming across the solution via mediation, before reaching court.

With many divorcees reporting that it has also brought them closer together as they collaborate on the common goal of securing their children’s best interests, it is likely to increase in popularity.

On the surface, then, this is a promising route to a civilised family life after divorce.

However, it must be borne in mind that no two couples and no two divorces are the same, so there are no one-size-fits-all options. Below are some factors to consider if you’re wondering whether birds’ nest custody is right for your family:

  • The ages of the children. Some may be of an age where they can accommodate this arrangement, but older children may rebel, or feel unsettled by the situation.
  • How you will communicate what’s happening to your offspring. While the arrangement might give children a sense of security, it could also be quite confusing for them and raise false hope that their parents might get back together. Explaining it very carefully – particularly to younger children – is vital.
  •  Co-operation from your ex. The levels of trust and support needed to make birds’ nest custody work are quite rare among ex-partners, as inconvenient ‘real world’ practicalities will inevitably effect the arrangement. For example, one or both of you could meet someone else. There is also the issue of cooking and shopping for your ex, when you must declare that you have lived separately and apart before decree absolute can be granted.

We recommend that boundaries and rules are drawn up, written down – and signed up to before you embark on this arrangement.

Difficulties and obstacles are not insurmountable, but parents would need to compromise and plan and communicate effectively – just as in other child custody matters.

 Kate, is the Head of the Children Department at Jones Myers.   She is highly skilled in cases relating to children including contact and residence disputes.

Kate specialises in child protection law and is a Member of the Child Care Panel with experience representing parents, guardians, Local Authorities and children.

As well as working regionally and nationally, Kate has considerable expertise in international child abduction cases and is a Member of the International Child Abduction and Custody Unit.

Kate has “Higher Court Rights,” something fewer than 2,500 solicitors have in England and Wales, which enables her to offer clients an all-round litigation service.

Clients find her sensitive, caring and approachable and she engenders these principles in all of her team.

Holidays triggering Divorce

How to Pick a Good Divorce Lawyer?

Soila Sindiyo  Child Trauma Therapist  Founder of The Divorce Magazine
Soila Sindiyo
Parenting Therapist
Founder of The Divorce Magazine

Recently, a couple of mums and a dad at my daughter’s school separately asked if they could speak with me in confidence.

All three are going through divorce and are in the first stages of the divorce process.

All three needed to know if I could recommend  a divorce solicitor.

Their stories were different but two of them asked me the same question; “What makes a good divorce lawyer?”

This, I must say, is a very easy question to answer.

Firstly a good divorce lawyer is one who specialises in divorce law, preferably one who only works in this field.  If you have children, as each of the parents in this case had, I would go further and say find one that has great experience in divorce law where children are concerned.

A good divorce lawyer will not be one who fans the flames of your anger or even one who starts a fire where there is none.

When I was going through my divorce, I had a meeting with a lawyer who, in all honesty, remains the worst lawyer I have met in my life!  All she wanted was blood, despite my telling her that’s not what I wanted.  I only went to her because she was very local to me and I was thinking about the convenience.  I never did work with her.

Years later, I needed a notary, so returned to the same firm believing that my previous not-so-good experience was only due to the particular lawyer I had spoken to.  The person whom I spoke with over the phone was very condescending and patronising and they were going to charge me over £100 more than the other firms I spoke with.  I had heard all I needed.

Anyway, I digress.

A good divorce solicitor will know how to manage your feelings of vengeance and hurt.  They will not allow them to come into the picture in shape or form as that will only cause war between you and your soon-to-be-ex.

 

A good divorce solicitor will not mind you asking any questions that are important for you to get answers to, as “ridiculous” as some of them may be.  They will know and understand that the next few months are indeed going to determine how your life after divorce turns out and they will have a major role to play in it.

  • How long have you practiced family law?
  • Do you have past clients I can speak with?
  • What are your fees and what should I be aware off in terms of other (hidden) costs?
  • What do you think about family mediation?
  • What do I need to do to make the divorce process as smooth as possible?
  • What if I decided to change solicitors, what would that mean for me?

Finally, do trust your gut.  Always trust your gut.  Meet with at least 3 solicitors before making up your mind. Most solicitors offer an free consultation. Use it.

Good luck!

Soila is the founder of The Divorce Magazine and creator of the five-star-rated  online course – Helping Children Cope with Divorce

She is known for taking away the pain of trauma and loss in children, adolescents and their families and is the author of “When Love is Broken. A read-together book for children and parents going through divorce and separation.

Soila holds an MSc in Psychoanalytic Developmental Psychology from UCL (University College London), is an accredited Positive Parenting Program (Triple P) practitioner and a trained Family Mediator.

Soila is Graduate Member of the British Psychological Society.

You can contact her on 07850 85 60 66 or via email soila@thedivorcemagazine.co.uk 

 

/

How to Generate Extra Income as a Family Lawyer by Becoming a Family Mediator

Austin Chessell www.thedivorcemagazine.co.uk
Austin Chessell

Legal Aid may have gone for a lot of Family and Children legal matters but there are still other avenues to consider to complement your Family Law background.

In this article Austin Chessell from FAMIA will share his experience of how to move into Family Mediation and some of the challenges and liabilities he faces as a Family Mediator.

Shifting the Weight of your Experience:

What training, soft skills and otherwise, do you need to develop as a family practitioner in a post Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders world.

I have been involved in the field of Family Law sector since 2005.

In 2010 I wanted to not just work as a Family Solicitor.  I wanted the challenge of working with separating couples not just individuals.  I wanted to work with separating couples that focused on the families’ interests rather than having fixed positions.

I looked into how this could be achieved and decided to train as a Family Mediator.  A lot of Family Solicitors or Counsellors move into the field of Family Mediation.

Five years on I am now doing more work as a Family Mediator than as a Family Solicitor.

The foundation training costs around £2,500. If your firm is not willing to pay this then you might wish to consider funding this yourself and then being reimbursed when you start to see clients.

Once you have started to mediate then you can build on your mediation knowledge. A lot of the families I work with have an international element to their issue so it is important to keep up to date in this area.

If you enjoy working with children then you should consider doing the Direct Consultation with Children course.

Once you complete your accreditation you may want to be a supervisor and undertake Professional Practice Consultant (PPC) training.  I completed the PPC training last year and I am working with several supervisees who are working towards accreditation.

An Out-of-court Options Update

I am working with several families at the moment in mediation where they feel that communication has broken down and also one or both of them feel that there is no trust.

The first session was used for the separating couples to discuss strategies on how communication and trust can be worked on and improved even before we started to discuss childcare and financial matters.

becoming a Family MediatorThe courts are becoming aware how important a role Family Mediators can play in helping to resolve family matters out of court. I am involved with schemes at the Central Family Court and Barnet Family Court where, for cases having the first hearing, the courts are trying to encourage the separating couple to try mediation if both clients are willing and the matter is appropriate for the mediation process.

I am pleased that I went on an online mediation training course with Stephen Anderson. I am getting more and more clients where one client is not based in London. I have used Skype for clients.

Last month I did a Skype mediation for a client based in Ireland who had a disability and another case where a mother lives in Hong Kong to focus on financial and children matters. Make sure you do a test Skype mediation call before the actual mediation if you are doing a Skype mediation session.

I notice more recently that Solicitors are looking at ways to regularly work with mediators. I am part of the scheme with Dialogue First where clients choose this process. The clients have a Solicitor assigned to them. The clients can then seek legal advice from their Solicitor after each Mediation session.

Clients come to mediation having a general knowledge that if they can resolve matters in mediation it is generally a cheaper, quicker and less adversarial process than going to court. The last few years clients seem to be more informed of what mediation is and how it works before I meet them.

If mediation does not resolve on every matter then there is the possibility for the matter to be referred to arbitration if both clients want this to happen for a binding decision. I am looking forward to discussing Family Mediation and Arbitration with Charmaine Hast from Wedlake Bell on 16th March at the Solicitors Journal live event.

 The Unbundling of Services: Challenges and Liabilities

In mediation you ask screening questions with each client at the start of the process to try and establish which cases are not appropriate for mediation.

Recent examples of mediation matters that have not proceeded are where one client to the mediation process did not want to make a full financial disclosure of their assets and the other client believed that some assets were being hidden.

Becoming a Family Mediator

It can also sometimes be a challenge where one client wants to see you for a shortened Mediation Information Assessment Meeting (MIAM). If a client has attended a MIAM before with another service then I may do a shorter MIAM but if it is a client who is new to mediation I explain that most clients I see for a MIAM to do it properly takes around 45 minutes to an hour.

Some mediation cases where Lawyers are present, it is sometimes a case of if the clients need some space with just them and the mediators and no Lawyers to let the Lawyers know this. You need to do what is right for the clients.

Most of my Family Mediation cases work on the model of 90-minute joint sessions but half a day and full day mediation sessions are possible if the clients have a court case taking place very soon.

It can be quite expensive at the start of the mediation journey with the mediation foundation course fee and regular supervision meetings.

It takes time to build up a mediation caseload. Find time to create a plan of how many clients you would like to work with and decide what action and networking needs to be done to achieve this.

My plan is always changing but if you have a plan you have something to aim for. Marketing can often take place outside of work hours so if you are attending breakfast events or late night networking, aim to attend events that you enjoy being at. I tend to find having a chat with one to two people works better rather than going round the whole room to aim to speak to everyone, but again you need to find a networking strategy that works for you.

I am now working at a fixed office in Angel at the Business Design Centre for Family Mediation meetings. Five years ago I used to rent rooms in offices over several offices across London. This was good initially to keep the room hire costs down but I found that a lot of time in the day would be lost travelling from North, East and Central London so I now aim to get clients to meet me at one location.

Make sure that you have mediation insurance in place and that you have the right level of cover especially for financial mediation matters.

Other Areas of Law that Family Practitioners could Work in to Strengthen their Skillset

I have been able to diversify my Family Law skill set by undertaking training to become a Collaborative Family Solicitor and Family Mediator.

I want to be known as a specialist Solicitor and Mediator. A lot of clients when they come to you, want to work with someone is a specialist in their area. I think it is harder to get this message across if you work in lots of areas of law.

In Family Law I work within the areas of divorce, finances, children, relocation, pre-nuptial and post-nuptial agreements, domestic violence and child abduction.

In Family Mediation the matters, I tend to cover are how the divorce will commence and who is the Petitioner, childcare, finances, direct consultations with children, grandparents wanting to see their grandchildren and also LGBT families.

Thinking Ahead if you want to Become a Family Mediator

If you are thinking of becoming a Family Mediator do your research.  Make sure that the foundation course you are signing up for will be recognised when you apply for accreditation.

Before you start to mediate you will need to observe some mediations and also do some co-mediation hours. See what opportunities are available for this. I found that I had more opportunities to observe and co-mediate by contacting mediation services outside of London.

Try to find a PPC who you are comfortable working with.

When I started mediating, I found that I had to ask a lot of practical questions and when I started mediating with clients the questions I had were more about dealing with the client and the process. Make sure that the PPC has time to supervise you as sometimes you may need to speak to the PPC urgently.

If you do not have enough cases to be accredited then you might need to consider whether you charge mediation clients less than other local mediation practices or co-mediate on a pro-bono basis with an established mediator.

Once you become accredited a lot more opportunities become available. Getting the accreditation for me has been my biggest challenge as a mediator. It took around two years for me to get the required cases for the portfolio.

If you are from a legal background you may want to consider going on a level 2 and / or 3 Counselling diploma course. I found this course very helpful when writing up my reflections for the mediation portfolio.

I have written several Family Mediation updates for Solicitors Journal since 2011 covering some of the above in more detail. These articles should still be available on the Solicitors Journal website to help with your Family Mediation journey.

About Austin

Austin Chessell is an accredited Family and Child Mediator at FAMIA (www.famia.co.uk) across Inner and Greater London. Austin is also a Professional Practice Consultant.

Austin is a Collaborative Family Solicitor at Feltons Solicitors in Knightsbridge.

Twitter @FamilyLawLondon

1 15 16 17 18 19 22