Family Law in Partnership - Page 6

114 result(s) found.

Marriage is going 'out of fashion' today's Census reveals
Photo by HiveBoxx on Unsplash

Marriage is going ‘out of fashion’ today’s Census reveals

Abby Buckland
Abby Buckland
Family and Divorce
Partner
Kingsley Napley

The latest Census on marriage and civil partnership status in England and Wales, released this morning, shows that the number of people getting married is at the lowest rate on record and the median age of those getting married is increasing.

The data also suggests a divergence of approach to traditional relationship structures between generations. While more people are choosing not to marry or form a civil partnership at all, this is being seen in a far greater proportion in younger age groups.

The biggest increase in this trend is evident in the 25 to 29 years age group, where 73.9% chose not to marry or be in a civil partnership in 2011 rising to 84.2% in 2021. The increase for those aged 30 to 34 years was from 49.2% to 58.9% between 2011 and 2021.

Today’s data confirms that marriage is falling “out of fashion”. These statistics should add weight to the importance of the Government bringing proper focus to the rights of cohabiting couples.

Disappointingly, reform in this area was effectively shelved by the Government at the end of last year, a decision which, this data shows, could leave huge numbers of individuals without effective legal protections should their relationships end.

Click here for more articles from Kingsley Napley

About Abby Buckland

Abby is a Partner in the Family and Divorce team in Kingsley Napley who undertakes matters involving all aspects of private family law and in particular complex financial issues and private children cases.

How can I get my abusive partner to leave our home?
Image by @georgerudy on stock.adobe.com

How can I get my abusive partner to leave our home?

Anthony Parrish, Partner - Jones Myers
Anthony Parrish
Partner
Jones Myers

Sadly, we work with many clients who, along with their children, are victims of domestic abuse.

Some flee the spousal home with little more than the clothes they stand up in while others stay and suffer in silence – because they fear losing any legal rights they may have.

It is vital that you know there are injunctions you can take out which entail the Court making an order protecting you and your children from abuse or harassment by your partner/spouse and prevent them from living in your home.

Non-Molestation Order

An FL401 form enables you to apply for a Non-Molestation Order, which forbids your spouse/partner from:

  • Coming to, or near, your home
  • Using or threatening violence against you and your children
  • Intimidating, harassing, or pestering you and your children
  • Going to places such as schools that you and your children visit regularly.
  • Send/engage in threatening communication through letter, telephone, text message, or other means of communication (including social media).
  • Not to instruct or encourage a third party to do any of the above on their behalf.

Occupation Order

The same form can also be used to apply for an Occupation Order, where the court decides who should live in, or return to, the home or any part of it.

Depending upon your circumstances, you can apply for a non-molestation order, an occupation order – or both.

The application does not require court fees. If a family lawyer assists you with the application, you pay for their fees. Legal Aid is available for applications of this nature provided the required thresholds for qualification are met.

Key Factors the Court Will Consider 

  • The housing needs/resources of you and your spouse/partner and children
  • Your respective finances
  • Your behaviour to each other
  • The likely impact of a Court order/decision not to exercise its powers, on the health/safety/wellbeing of you, your spouse/partner and your children.

Considerations for Married Couples

If you were married and have no existing right to occupy the property, the Court will also examine:

  • The length of time since you last lived together.
  • How long ago your marriage was dissolved.
  • If any current legal proceedings exist between you for a financial order following your divorce, or for an order under Schedule 1 Children Act 1989 for financial relief or relating to the legal or beneficial ownership of the property.

Considerations for Cohabitees

If you are living with your partner and have no existing right to occupy the property, the Court will examine:

  • If you have any children together or if you have, or have had, parental responsibility for any children (stepchildren, godchildren etc)
  • If an Order is made in your favour, it could be for a specified period – often six months – or until another Court Order is made. In some situations, the Order can be renewed for another six months.

The protection the court offers is available to married, divorced, cohabiting and former cohabiting couples along with those in civil partnerships.

Domestic abuse occurs in all levels of society – regardless of race, gender, wealth, or age.

In confidential consultations highly skilled and sensitive family law specialists like us who have extensive expertise in helping victims of victims of domestic violence, discuss all your options and advise on the way forward. This includes court applications for an injunction as outlined above.

We can also suggest other organisations who can help you outside the legal process.

For more information on the FL401 form, visit the Government website.

Click here for more articles by Anthony Parrish

About Anthony Parrish

Anthony’s extensive experience in family law spans over two decades, during which time he has developed specialisms in matters relating to children law.

A member of Jones Myers internationally renowned Children’s Department, he deals with issues relating to children, teenagers, parents (including those represented through their official solicitor) and local authorities.

His expertise also encompasses international child abduction cases and same sex relationship issues.

A solicitor and client shaking hands sat at a desk with paper work.
Photo by AmnajKhetsamtip on Unsplash
/

Solicitors still key to successful separation, despite introduction of ‘no-fault’ divorce 

Megan Bennie
Megan Bennie
Family Law Solicitor
Furley Page

While it may be tempting to think that no-fault divorce makes lawyers unnecessary to the process, this is far from the case. Taking advice from a solicitor, even if it’s only a single appointment early in the process, can ensure any application starts off correctly and stays on the right track so that it is ultimately concluded in a way that is as efficient and stress free as possible. 

Following the introduction of ‘no-fault‘ divorce in April 2022, one or both spouses now simply need to confirm the marriage has broken down irretrievably. The language used has been simplified and the forms are now accessed through an online portal, which has made the application process for divorce (or dissolution where there is a civil partnership) a lot more straightforward. 

Nevertheless, for most separating couples the divorce application is only one part of the separation process, and sorting out finances and child arrangements can prove much more contentious and challenging.  

Financial matters, particularly the daunting prospect of safeguarding one’s long-term financial future after separation, can be a hugely emotive topic. Many people find that having a solicitor as a ‘buffer’ between themselves and their former partner can help them manage the separation and financial negotiation process a lot more easily. 

Furthermore, a solicitor can be very helpful in dealing with the many complex rules and guidelines that determine what a court would consider a fair financial settlement in that family’s particular circumstances.

As the online divorce process does not formalise the financial settlement, a separate court order (known as a consent order) will still be required, which needs to be properly drafted by a solicitor and approved by the court, even in cases where there is agreement between both parties. A solicitor will also ensure that all aspects of the settlement have been considered, including tax implications and pensions. 

One of the primary concerns our clients have is making suitable, fair arrangements for the care of their children, both in terms of how they will deal with the relationship breakdown and what living arrangements will be put in place thereafter. 

A solicitor can negotiate on their client’s behalf in relation to child arrangements and support them through the court process if this becomes necessary, although for most family’s mediation led by an independent, specially trained third party will be the most suitable route for resolving matters concerning children.  

The best outcomes are achieved through cooperation as, for the most part, separating couples want the same thing: a fair division of their finances to be completed swiftly so they can move forward with their lives. Instructing solicitors who are committed to resolving disputes in a swift, constructive and, if possible, amicable way can make a huge difference to outcomes, costs and stress levels. 

Click here for more articles by Megan

About Megan

Megan Bennie is an Associate in the family law team Furley Page.

Megan joined the team in 2021, having gained valuable previous experience at specialist family law firms featured in the Legal 500 directory.

Megan advises on all aspects of relationship breakdown, whether divorce or separation, including in relation to civil partnerships, dealing with issues such as the appropriate division of finances.

Megan also assists couples seeking to formalise arrangements through pre and post nuptial agreements and cohabitation (or living together) agreements. She can also assist with legal issues arising when cohabitation comes to an end whether there is a cohabitation agreement in place or not.

Megan can provide legal advice on a wide range of areas relating to children including arrangements for contact and who a child lives with, where a child lives (including relocation to another jurisdiction) and in relation to special guardianship and adoption.

Megan is primarily based at the Chatham office but is also available for meetings at either the Canterbury or Whitstable office.

 

UK couples turning to 'pet-nups' to help resolve disagreements over pets when relationships break down 
Photo by Jamie Street on Unsplash

UK couples turning to ‘pet-nups’ to help resolve disagreements over pets when relationships breakdown 

Megan Bennie
Megan Bennie
Family Law Solicitor
Furley Page

With around 60% of UK households owning a pet, it’s no surprise that who gets custody of any animals can be a key area of negotiation when relationships break down. 

For many people a pet is not just an animal, it’s a fully-fledged member of the family, so it’s no wonder that pets can be a particularly emotive topic for clients when relationships end. Unfortunately, a pet’s treatment by the law hasn’t kept up with the way they are generally viewed by their owners. 

In the UK, the law treats pets as possessions, meaning in a divorce case, a beloved pet would, in theory, be treated by a Court as no different from an armchair or television. 

In reality, the Courts rarely deal with cases regarding pets for a variety of reasons, notably the cost of bringing legal action. When the Court does deal with animal matters, its focus is generally on who is the legal owner or provides the majority of the animal’s care.  

For most people, cases are settled away from the Courtroom through direct discussions between the adults involved, with the needs of the pet and the wishes of any children in the family ideally being a consideration too.  

Some couples are also using ‘pet-nups’ to pre-empt or avoid difficult issues that could arise should a relationship break down. Although not legally binding, the pet-nup can be an essential tool in avoiding stressful and expensive disputes at a later date and keeping the matter out of the Courtroom, and could be taken into consideration if the matter were to end up in Court. 

Where issues can’t be resolved directly or there is no pre-existing agreement, a lawyer can help by negotiating on a client’s behalf to try to ensure they achieve what they want for their pet, whether that’s continued ownership, visitation, or just to know the pet will be well cared for. 

Mediation is another option, whereby an independent third party can help a former couple to work their way through the issues around pet ownership in much the same way they would with issues relating to children of finances. 

Click here for more articles by Furley Page

About Megan Bennie

Megan Bennie is a family law solicitor at Furley Page.  Megan joined the team in 2021, having gained valuable previous experience at specialist family law firms featured in the Legal 500 directory.

Megan advises on all aspects of relationship breakdown, whether divorce or separation, including in relation to civil partnerships, dealing with issues such as the appropriate division of finances and ongoing arrangements for children.

Megan also assists couples seeking to formalise arrangements through pre and post nuptial agreements and cohabitation (or living together) agreements.

Megan is primarily based at the Chatham office but is also available for meetings at either the Canterbury or Whitstable offices.

www.furleypage.co.uk

 

Concerns raised that Depp/Heard trial could discourage domestic abuse survivors from seeking help 
Photo by Brett Jordan on Unsplash

Concerns raised that Depp/Heard trial could discourage domestic abuse survivors from seeking help 

Megan Bennie
Megan Bennie
Family Law Solicitor
Furley Page

There are concerns that the ongoing defamation case between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in the USA is creating an atmosphere that might discourage domestic abuse victims in the UK from coming forward to seek help. 

Depp is suing his former wife for defamation following a newspaper article in which she identified herself a victim of domestic abuse, despite the article not explicitly naming Depp. Amber Heard is counter-suing her former husband, also for defamation. 

The American proceedings have been very public and have seen a huge wave of support for Johnny Depp, and positively venomous coverage of Amber Heard and the evidence she has given, despite the proceedings not even having concluded.    

Family lawyers in this country have watched with increasing concern for victims of domestic abuse seeking help here.  Anecdotal evidence suggests the hearing has made victims reluctant to seek help, fearing matters of a very sensitive and private nature could be made public and potentially expose them to harm or ridicule.  

This is very concerning, as it is essential that the victims of domestic abuse are able to seek support. Fortunately, cases are dealt with very differently in the Family Court to the proceedings being shared from the current Depp/Heard trial.

For example, in the UK Family Court hearings about children and domestic abuse are not attended by members of the public or the media, only the people directly concerned can attend together with their legal advisers. There is no jury and a Judge will make the final decision in the case.    

So-called ‘special measures’ are available for the victims of domestic abuse to shield them from their abuser during a hearing or when giving evidence.

Unlike with the Depp/Heard trial, the content of the Family Court proceedings is private and the way questions are put to witnesses is very different 

Written evidence is only supplemented by oral questions and answers where it is strictly necessary and, where oral evidence is required, the alleged abuser will not be allowed to directly question the alleged victim.

The questions that lawyers can ask must be necessary to progress the case and should be put in a courteous manner to both parties. Family Court hearings are usually very brief, with most lasting less than a day. 

The first step in tackling domestic abuse is speaking to someone, so it is very worrying to hear that some victims may feel unable to come forward to seek help as a result of the ongoing Depp/Heard defamation case.

Fortunately, in the UK Family Court measures are in place to ensure confidentiality and safety for those concerned.

Click here for more articles by Furley Page

About Megan Bennie

Megan Bennie is a family law solicitor at Furley Page.  Megan joined the team in 2021, having gained valuable previous experience at specialist family law firms featured in the Legal 500 directory.

Megan advises on all aspects of relationship breakdown, whether divorce or separation, including in relation to civil partnerships, dealing with issues such as the appropriate division of finances and ongoing arrangements for children.

Megan also assists couples seeking to formalise arrangements through pre and post nuptial agreements and cohabitation (or living together) agreements.

Megan is primarily based at the Chatham office but is also available for meetings at either the Canterbury or Whitstable offices.

www.furleypage.co.uk

Is a pre-nup enforceable
Photo by Sir Manuel on Unsplash

Is a pre-nup enforceable?

Layla Babadi
Legal Director
Solicitor
Nelsons

2022 has been a landmark year for family law, with the introduction of the ‘no-fault’ divorce law coming into effect on 6 April removing the need to prove a relationship has broken down.

Meanwhile, many couples across the country are still waiting to tie the knot following Covid-related postponements and delays to their wedding day.

Although a pre-nup may appear unromantic on the surface, I discuss why now is the time for these couples to consider putting one in place.

What are pre-nuptial agreements?

A pre-nuptial agreement, or pre-marital agreement, is an agreement made by a couple before they marry or enter into a civil partnership. It sets out how they wish their assets to be divided should they divorce or have their civil partnership dissolved.

Pre-nuptial agreements are not automatically enforceable in English and Welsh courts.

Commonly associated with the rich and famous, pre-nuptial agreements can often be sensationalised by news stories. This has led to widespread belief that the agreements are unfair, worthless and unromantic, when in fact they can be a sensible, fair and transparent way to discuss financial matters and agree the outcome in the event of separation.

What does the court say?

In 2010, the Supreme Court held that courts should give effect to a pre-nuptial agreement that is freely entered into by each party with a full appreciation of its implications, unless, in the circumstances prevailing, it would not be fair to hold the parties to their agreement.

The ruling does not make pre-nuptial agreements binding in all cases, but the fairness of upholding any particular agreement will be considered by the court on a case-by-case basis.

However, some pre-nuptial agreements will now have effect in the absence of circumstances, which would make this unfair.

In February 2014, following consultation, the Law Commission published its final report, Matrimonial Property, Needs and Agreements.

Among other things, it recommended the introduction of “qualifying nuptial agreements” as enforceable contracts, which would enable couples to make binding arrangements for the financial consequences of divorce or dissolution.

These agreements, which would have to meet certain requirements, would not be subject to the court’s assessment of fairness. Couples would not be able to contract out of meeting the financial needs of each other and of any children.

Growing in popularity

While not everyone will want to contemplate the end of a marriage or civil partnership before it has even begun, pre-nuptial agreements are certainly gaining in popularity as a good way of helping couples decide what should happen in the event of a divorce.

The creation of a pre-nuptial agreement also requires that certain formalities are observed, which can help provide further peace of mind for both parties. For example:

  • The agreement must be entered into by both parties without any pressure from one party on the other;
  • An agreement signed within 21 days before the marriage or civil partnership is generally regarded as inappropriate;
  • Both parties must fully appreciate the implications of entering into the agreement. Before any agreement is signed, each party must be fully aware of the financial position of the other;
  • Individuals should both take independent legal advice before entering into the agreement from a specialist family lawyer;
  • The agreement must be fair, making provision for any children and future children. It must meet the needs of the parties and any children;
  • Reviewing the pre-nuptial agreement if there are any changes in circumstances, such as the birth of any children.

Three golden rules

As with any formal paperwork relating to relationships, the prospect can be somewhat daunting.

However, there are three simple and easy-to-follow pieces of advice that we recommend couples follow when deciding to get a pre-nuptial agreement:

  1. Don’t leave it until the last minute

Explore the topic early on and don’t wait until the week before the wedding to discuss a pre-nuptial agreement. You will have enough to worry about as your big day approaches, so plan ahead.

  1. Think with your head and not with your heart

It is difficult to talk about a loving relationship as if it were a business arrangement. You and your partner need to think logically, rather than emotionally about the preparation of a pre-nuptial agreement.

  1. It’s not just about protecting the “wealthier” partner

Traditionally, a pre-nuptial agreement determines the fate of assets that each party brings to the marriage. But the agreement can also address debt obligations, future inheritance and gifted financial resources from outside of the marriage. Both of you stand to benefit from having the agreement in place.

A pre-nuptial agreement does not have to be an unromantic, daunting or depressing task. An agreement can often help couples better understand exactly where they stand at the start of or during a marriage or civil partnership and in the event of divorce.

Hopefully, the agreement will never be needed, and a couple will spend many happy years together.

Click here for more articles by Nelsons

About Layla Babadi

Layla is a Legal Director at Nelsons. She qualified as a solicitor in 2005 and joined the Family Law team in 2015.

Layla specialises in divorce and separation, with a particular emphasis on international divorce law. She also advises on pre and post nuptial agreements and separation agreements.

Lates changes to no-fault divorce
Photo by Ethan Smith on Unsplash
//

What do latest changes to no fault divorce mean for separated couples?   

Adrian Clossick
Head of Divorce and Family
Stewarts Leeds office

Deciding to get a divorce is never an easy decision and going through the process can be very difficult, no matter the reason for it.

But did you know that the landscape for separated couples is changing, with divorce law set to undergo a dramatic shake up?

Long-awaited reforms that were originally planned to come into effect this autumn have been pushed out until spring 2022. This new legislation is known as no-fault divorce and has been coined by many as ‘the end of the blame game’.

I will be discussing no-fault divorce, the changes due to come into effect in spring 2022, and the benefits of this new legislation for separated couples.

What is no-fault divorce?

No-fault divorce is the first major divorce law reform since the 1970s, which will put an end to couples being forced to find blame in one party for the marriage breakdown.

The Act was passed in June 2020 and the changes were originally set to be implemented from autumn 2021. It has since been announced that the government is working on a new commencement date of 6th April 2022.

What does it mean for separated couples?

What no-fault divorce means is that come spring 2022, couples will no longer need to prove one of the five facts as set out in current divorce legislation:

  • Adultery
  • Desertion
  • Unreasonable behaviour
  • Two years separation with consent
  • Five years separation without consent

Instead, the new law will retain the sole ground of divorce being that the marriage has irretrievably broken down, but the need to specify one of the five “fault based” facts will be removed, replacing  it with a statement that the marriage has broken down irretrievably, and there will be no requirement of proof. This will put an end to any blame needing to be given for the marriage breakdown.

The emphasis of no-fault divorce is to encourage a constructive approach to separation and focus on reconciliation, reflection and trusting the judgment of the couple wishing to file for divorce.

No-fault divorce will reduce conflict, allowing couples to focus on important issues like children, property and finances.

The new legislation will:

  • Replace the ‘five facts’ with a new requirement to provide a statement of irretrievable breakdown
  • Remove the possibility of contesting the divorce
  • Introduce an option for a joint application

These changes will also apply to the dissolution of civil partnerships.

Legal terminology changes

If you are finding yourself struggling with legal terminology around divorce, this is also set to undergo a change.

The new legislation is also set to make sure language around divorce is in plain English. Examples include:

  • The petitioner will now be called the applicant
  • Changing ‘decree nisi’ to conditional order
  • Changing ‘decree absolute’ to final order

No-fault divorce: The benefits

There are several benefits of a no-fault divorce, including:

  • It removes blame
  • It better reflects modern relationships
  • It is more current and up to date
  • It negates the need to fit one of the ‘five facts’ into the reason for the marriage breakdown
  • It is a more simplified process
  • It removes the option to contest the divorce

The current law forces those whose marriage is over to blame the other for the breakdown if they are not prepared to wait for a minimum of two years after separation to divorce. If the other spouse does not agree to the divorce, that period is extended to five years.

Very few clients wish to wait that long. They therefore find themselves having to blame the other party’s adultery or unreasonable behaviour to obtain an immediate divorce, whether or not that reflects the reality of the reasons for their separation. This can polarise positions and amp up emotions.”

Coping strategies

If you are separated and awaiting the no-fault divorce legislation to commence next spring, there are several ways to help cope through the difficult adjustment:

Lean on support networks

This period is challenging, mentally, emotionally and physically, and it is important to share your feelings with friends and family to help you get through this period. Other options include joining a support group where you can share feelings with those going through a similar situation.

Avoid isolation

Isolating yourself, particularly during difficult situations like separation and divorce, can raise stress levels, impact concentration and cause barriers with work and relationships, as well as mental and physical health.

Self-care

Ensure you are good to yourself and your body. Ensure you are taking time out to exercise, eat a well-balanced diet and factor in vital periods of relaxation. Try and stick to your normal routine as much as possible, and try to avoid making any major additional decisions or changes.

A positive approach

While it will be challenging at times, try and approach this period positively by embracing new activities, spending time with new sets of friends and moving forward with reasonable expectations to help make the transition easier.

The landmark law changes are set to change the divorce law landscape for separated couples significantly in the future.

The change in the law has been supported by the majority of divorce lawyers as it is bringing divorce law into the 21st century. Removing the need to blame the other spouse for the breakdown of the marriage will hopefully result in a more dignified process for all concerned and enable divorcing spouses to focus on resolving the real issues between them. In short, the change should make the divorce process kinder.

Click here for more articles from Stewarts

About Adrian Clossick

Adrian Clossick is Head of Divorce and Family at Stewarts Leeds office, the UK’s leading litigation-only law firm.

www.stewarts.com

How coronavirus will affect the value of your business if get a divorce  
Photo by Keren Levand on Unsplash

How coronavirus will affect the value of your business if get a divorce  

Jo Hawkins
Jo Hawkins
MD
Hawkins Family Law

Coronavirus itself will not impact your assets, such as businesses and property, it is the potential economic fallout in terms of the value of shares and the property market that could cause problems.

The asset value will still need to be determined either by agreement or by the Court and thereafter those assets will be apportioned between the divorcing parties by agreement or court order.

We spoke with Hawkins Family Law, expert divorce law specialists to find out what happens to assets when you are going through a divorce in a pandemic.

How does the current financial climate impact the value of my business?

The value of the shares in your business, or if you are in a partnership or operating as a sole trader the value of your share of your business, will very much depend on the nature of the business and how the pandemic has affected the business over the last 18 months or so.

Your management accounts for the last 12 months will provide a reality check for you on how things have been affected and an initial discussion with your accountant may also assist, depending upon your industry.

Some businesses have thrived and seen growth over the last 18 months, and this will be clear from their balance sheets and profit and loss statements, which in turn will gear what the value of any shareholding or interest might be.

Other types of businesses, especially in the travel and hospitality arena, have seen a decline in profits made due to the lockdown of everything non-essential. Others may have held their own with the assistance of government funding and be looking at trading out of any fall in profit.

What happens if my business is now worthless due to the Coronavirus?

Assessing why you think your interest in your business is worthless will be key. Just because you have had a poor year does not necessarily mean the business is worthless – it may be that the business will recover and certainly any valuation carried out will assess not only the value now but the value also moving forwards.

Evidence here is going to be key, and we would always recommend that the parties look to instruct a single joint expert (generally an accountant) to prepare a report considering the value of the parties’ respective interests and what the future looks like.

The Court will then assess the evidence and any questions asked of the expert to determine whether in fact the business is now worthless or not. Certainly, the Court cannot make this assessment without the experts’ report. The expert will also look at the liquidity in the business (if any). In other words, what capital could the business raise that could then be used by the parties and what the tax implications of withdrawing any funds from the business would be.

The Court will not seek to destroy any business particularly, as often the business is the sole or main income provider for the family, which is why these reports are so valuable as they provide factual information.

How are businesses valued now?

It is crucial that evidence of the value of the business is available in divorce court hearings. This is generally obtained by both parties, instructing an expert to provide a single joint report.

This evidence together with any other financial evidence will then be used by the judge to reach his or her decision as to how the finances should be divided taking into account the factors laid down by the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, what is fair and what meets the parties’ respective needs.

When you have a business, or property assets, we would always advise taking advice at an early stage so that you can be prepared for reaching a financial agreement whether directly or with the assistance of a Judge, arbitrator, or mediator.

Our expert divorce family lawyers are available to provide further clarity and advice on everything related to divorce and the current climate.

Click here for more articles by Hawkins Family Law

About Jo Hawkins

Jo Hawkins is the MD of the nationally recognised niche family law practice, Hawkins Family Law, which was established in 2001. With practices in Buckinghamshire, Hertfordshire & Oxfordshire, she specialises in all things divorce, financial matters, and child agreements.

 

Is getting divorced online the way forward
Photo by Christin Hume on Unsplash

Digital divorce: Is getting divorced online the way forward post-pandemic?

Angela Maxfield
Angela Maxfield
Solicitor in Family Law Team
Nelsons’

Many areas of life that are usually dealt with in person have been conducted online during the pandemic – and divorce proceedings are no exception.

As the COVID-19 restrictions ease, however, and near-normal service starts to resume, will digital divorces become the way forward or will clients return to their solicitors’ offices and courtrooms?

Are more divorcing couples now having digital divorces?

Most mediators only offer virtual meetings, while court hearings take place via phone and video. Divorce proceedings had been heading online before the pandemic but that change had only just come in for solicitors. Coronavirus has accelerated the decision to go digital.

What are the advantages of taking divorce online?

When it comes to the mediation aspects of divorce, some people feel more comfortable doing it over Zoom or Teams because they don’t have to be in the same room as their ex-partner. Mediators do have ways of getting around that potential issue though without going online.

For people handling their own divorce, taking the digital route means they can do it after normal working hours as the internet is available to them at any time. Of course, their application won’t be processed by the court until the working week begins, but it can be uploaded after hours. Digital divorces are quicker; during the pandemic court offices have been working remotely.

Are there any disadvantages?

Some aspects of the divorce process are definitely not best dealt with online. Couples who try to manage their own divorce proceedings online can find that the process moves more quickly than they anticipate and then find themselves at a disadvantage being divorced without first having sorted out their finances.

A good solicitor will advise their clients that they can use the court’s digital portal to reduce the costs on divorce, but that they are most unwise to ever consider not seeking the advice of a lawyer on where they stand financially before starting the divorce process online.  This is because some rights, for example spouses pensions, are lost at the moment the divorce is finalised.

Advice is also necessary because many people fail to appreciate that just because they are divorced that in itself doesn’t bring to an end the financial claims of their former spouse.  Further steps are needed in order to finalise those claims which otherwise remain open, potentially forever.

Also, some divorces produced online don’t look quite as official as paper ones. There have been occasions where clients haven’t been sure if they’ve received their court papers or not.  A solicitor can quickly clarify the position.

Do digital divorces save couples time and money?

Online divorce proceedings are designed for processing the divorce as opposed to settling the couple’s finances. If it’s a straightforward divorce, it can save parting spouses money as they only have the court fee to pay and not the solicitor.

Other than the fixed legal time limits, it can also save them time as the digital paperwork can be turned around much more quickly than the paper documents.

Solicitors also have access to the court’s digital portal and utilise the facility where they can to speed up the process for their clients where this is possible and appropriate.

Using the digital process without first seeking proper legal advice can mean that couples can lose out financially.

Will digital divorce continue once the pandemic is over?

With regard to processing divorce documents, the online option will continue. It is highly unlikely that the courts will backtrack on this now as removing the need for paperwork must save them a lot of time and money. Well before the pandemic, it was always the courts’ intention to go digital wherever possible. The outbreak has served to hasten this development.

Divorce hearings will continue to be held in court to some extent despite the digital revolution. Some hearings don’t work well online. Many people find them less than satisfactory, so in an ideal world, they will go back to face-to-face. On the other hand, directions hearings are procedural so may continue to take place either by video or phone, as they can be dealt with quite efficiently in this way.

Furthermore, financial consent orders work really well digitally. They can be uploaded to the court portal and dealt with rapidly, within a maximum time scale of four weeks.

Pre-pandemic, these orders were taking three to four months, so going digital has really speeded things up.  However, it is important that clients get independent legal advice on finances before considering applying for a consent order so that they are aware of all of their rights and understand the implications and consequences of the terms of the proposed order.

Hopefully, those hearings where final decisions are made with regard to the children of divorcing couples will no longer be held remotely – that way people can feel more confident that these important and emotional aspects have been dealt with properly.  The courts are already moving towards listing these hearings in a courtroom.

Body language can’t be read as accurately over a video call as it can in person. Video links can be disjointed – people start talking at the same time, especially on phones when there are no visual clues, or they can be cut off. Mobile signals at home can be unreliable and, as many of us have witnessed during the pandemic, there can be delays getting people on the line. While these are all challenges with technology that we’ve come to expect, it adds to what is already a highly-stressful time.

Some hearings are already going back to being held in courtrooms, so clearly, the intention is there. I imagine they’ll increase as social distancing regulations ease, making it easier to use more courtrooms at the same time.

Bearing all of this in mind, ideally, there should be a hybrid approach to divorce proceedings as we emerge from the pandemic.

Click here for more articles from Nelsons’

About Angela Maxfield

Angela qualified as a solicitor in 1985 and joined Nelsons’ expert family law team in December 2020 as an associate. Angela specialises in family law and advises on divorce, dissolution of civil partnerships, finances and private children disputes.

For more information on divorce and separation, please visit www.nelsonslaw.co.uk/divorce-and-separation or call 0800 024 1976.

missed financial settlement on divorce
Image by alex_barnes04 from Pixabay

Have you missed out on a financial settlement on divorce?

Jane Tenquist
Partner and Head of the Family Law Team
Myerson Solicitors

Many people do not pursue their financial claims following a marriage breakdown because they feel ashamed or guilty about their behaviour.

Others do not resolve financial matters due to the volatility in temper of the party who has been left behind. They believe that, in time, the spouse who they have left behind will “forgive” them and that it may be easier to resolve matters financially further down the line.

Unfortunately, this can often turn out to be a false assumption. Continuing to pay household bills and maintenance can lead to a precedent being fixed that this level of financial support will continue into the long term.

It can be quite common that one party may feel a huge sense of guilt if they have left their spouse or civil partner.

The marriage may have broken down due to:

  • One party announcing they are homosexual.
  • One party wishing to undergo gender reassignment surgery.
  • One party committing adultery.
  • One party having relationships with prostitutes and watching pornographic material.
  • One party leaving the other due to the other party’s inability to have children.
  • One party leaving the other due to the other party’s sickness.
  • Addiction issues.

People often assume that there will be a financial impact if one party has had an affair or left the marriage but, this will rarely make any difference to the overall division of assets.

The family court is not concerned about why the marriage ended. The court’s aim is to distribute the available assets fairly between the parties.

The starting point for the court is the checklist set out in Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1975, otherwise known as the section 25 factors which are:

  • The income, earning capacity, property, and other financial resources which each party has or is likely to have in the future.
  • The financial needs and responsibilities that each of the parties to the marriage has or is likely to have in the future.
  • The standard of living enjoyed by the family before separation
  • Any physical or mental disability of the parties.
  • The age of the parties and the length of the marriage.
  • The contributions made by each party to the welfare of the family (which means the contributions made towards looking after the home and the children are regarded as equal to the contributions made by the “breadwinner” of the family).
  • The conduct of each of the parties, if inequitable to disregard.
  • The value to each party to the marriage of any benefit which by reason of the divorce a party will lose the chance of acquiring.

It can be tempting for parties to want to list the details of each other’s bad behaviour, but it is rarely the case that conduct will be relevant in financial order proceedings. Although conduct is one of the section 25 factors, it will only be considered in very exceptional circumstances.

In the case of OG v AG, Mr Justice Mostyn said ‘times have changed, the financial remedy court is no longer a court of morals. Conduct should be taken into account not only where it is inequitable to disregard but only where its impact is financially measurable. It is unprincipled for the court to stick a finger in the air and arbitrarily to fine a party for what it regards as immoral conduct.’

If you have divorced but not sorted out the financial arrangements, then it is still possible to make a claim, provided that you have not remarried. Remarriage prevents a party from making a claim for spousal maintenance, a lump sum or property adjustment order.

There is no time limit for making a claim. If you are concerned that you have walked away from your marriage or civil partnership without a fair financial settlement, then please get in touch with a member of the family team.

About Jane Tenquist

Jane Tenquist is a Partner and Head of the Family Law Team at Myerson Solicitors.  She set up the Family department at Myerson in September 2012.

Jane’s work focus is in matrimonial finance, particularly involving complex issues relating to trusts and offshore assets.  Jane has enjoyed success in tracing hidden assets and obtaining freezing orders to prevent assets being diverted during matrimonial proceedings.

Preparing for divorce

Preparing for Divorce: What you need to know

Rupa Parekh
Rupa Parekh
Associate and Solicitor
Nelsons

After couples spent more than a year being cooped up in lockdown due to the coronavirus pandemic, it is perhaps unsurprising that there has been an increase in enquiries from spouses who are wanting to split from their partners.

However, making the decision to divorce is not one that should be made lightly. It is crucial to think through and obtain legal advice from the outset, so that you are prepared for the proceedings before initiating.

Whether amicable or acrimonious, going through a divorce is a stressful time that can cause conflict between both parties if not properly managed and prepared for. That’s why preparation is key when it comes to these kinds of proceedings, to ensure as smooth a transition as possible into the next chapter of your life.

Understand your financial situation

Alongside the divorce, one of the important things you will need to consider is the distribution of the financial assets. Therefore, estimating the value of the marital pot will help to give you an idea of what you may be entitled to as the court’s starting point is an equal sharing of matrimonial assets.

The court has discretion to depart from equality and this is determined by numerous factors. We’d always recommend keeping a budget of your income and expenses, because this documentation may be required when determining the amount of maintenance that may be awarded. 

Collate the paperwork

We understand that the sheer volume of paperwork required for divorce can seem overwhelming, which is why we recommend gathering all the relevant information as your first port of call. Doing this at an early date will save a lot of time moving forward and vastly aid in your preparation.

Some of the documents you need to ensure you have are statements and/or evidence for:

  • All bank and building society accounts
  • Credit cards
  • Loans
  • Investments
  • Mortgages
  • Title information

It’s also beneficial to have your most recent P60 and pay slips if you’re employed, or two years of accounts if you’re self-employed.

Look to the future

It can be very easy to get bogged down in the present and focus only on the current proceedings. However, it’s incredibly important to try and provide for yourself and any children after your divorce, so you may want to consider further training or a change of job to improve your position.

While the court can make an order in providing you with maintenance, it also has a duty to consider the financial independence of both parties moving forwards.

Document your valuables

We would also advise our clients to keep a full record of possessions, with photographs if possible – this includes the contents of your house, vehicles– as, if anything goes missing, this provides proof of its existence. If you have particular concerns that your spouse may damage or take your belongings during proceedings, you may also consider storing valuable items and documents elsewhere for safety.

Don’t act in haste

It can be tempting to move out of the marital home, but any decision of this magnitude should only be made once legal advice has been sought. Once the decision to move out has been made, going back on that choice can often be far more difficult and could also have an adverse effect on finances or the relationship with your children, if you have any.

Seek expert advice

As previously mentioned, the most important thing to do before going through a divorce is to seek legal advice. Having a solicitor put a strategy in place to help you navigate your way through proceedings will drastically ease stress during what we know can be an overwhelming and stressful time.

Solicitors can also help to give you a good indication of where you stand and how divorce will affect you financially. Every case is different, and it’s important you seek advice tailored to your specific circumstances.

About Rupa Parekh

Rupa Parekh qualified as a solicitor in 2017 and joined Nelsons’ family law team in October 2020.

She specialises in divorce and financial settlements, with an expertise in civil partnership dissolution, pre-nuptial, post-nuptial and separation agreements. She also advises on various disputes concerning children and domestic violence, specifically complex high net worth cases.

For more support when it comes to divorce and separation or any other aspect of family law, please visit  nelsonslaw.co.uk.

What Does "Unreasonable Behaviour" Mean
Featured Image by Robin Higgins from Pixabay

What Does “Unreasonable Behaviour” Mean?

Kerry Smith
Kerry Smith
Head of Family at
K J Smith Solicitors

In the UK, at present, if you want a “no-fault divorce”, then you need to wait at least two years. You may have to wait up to five years. If you want to divorce quickly, then you need to show that you have been the victim of adultery, desertion or “unreasonable behaviour”.

Unreasonable behaviour – the theory

In theory, there are three questions which need to be answered in order to decide if behaviour can be legally deemed unreasonable. These are:

  • What did the person do?
  • What impact did that have on the petitioner?
  • What does the court think of this in the context of the history of the marriage?
  • Unreasonable behaviour – the practice

In practice, the court’s job is to determine whether or not a marriage has irretrievably broken down. This means that they generally take that view that “unreasonable behaviour” is whatever the petitioner says it is unless the other party contests it.

What’s more, the law allows both parties and the courts a little room to manoeuvre. The respondent can choose to state that they disagree with the allegations against them but will not contest the divorce. For the most part, this allows divorce claims to progress in the same way as they would have if the respondent had accepted the allegations.

Presenting a claim for unreasonable behaviour

As a rule of thumb, you want to cite four to six examples of behaviours you consider to be unreasonable and their impact on you. In principle, these examples can relate to any behaviour which makes you feel like it is not feasible for you to continue in the marriage. In practice, it’s likely to be in your best interests to choose “no faults” reasons.

Basically, you want to cite behaviours which highlight mutual incompatibility rather than personal failings. For example, you could cite your spouse working long hours, spending long periods socializing without you or being excessively absorbed in a hobby they practice without you. None of these are personal criticisms, just indications that you should go your separate ways.

You generally want to resist the temptation to make any serious allegations especially anything involving children. Firstly, they may rile your spouse. Even if this doesn’t cause them to contest the divorce, it may cause them to be less cooperative about it. Secondly, it may give the judge the impression that you are weaponizing your children.

For clarity, piling on the examples of unreasonable behaviour will not (usually) increase either your chances of getting custody of your children or the value of any divorce settlement. In fact, once a judge is satisfied that the married is, effectively over, the reasons for its ending are generally completely ignored. They are also sealed off from the general public.

Completing the divorce process

It is absolutely permissible to cite unreasonable behaviour as grounds for divorce but still present the judge with a mutually-agreed settlement arrangement. In fact, it’s highly encouraged, particularly when there are children involved.

Keep in mind, however, that judges will look carefully at these settlements to make sure that they are legally sound. If a judge is unhappy with what they see, they can and will reject the proposal.

Resolving their objections may simply be a matter of making some minor amendments. The issue is that the need to make changes may push the divorce case back to the end of a long queue. This is a particular concern at the moment due to the ongoing impact of COVID19.

It is therefore very advisable to have divorce settlements checked by a mediator and/or a lawyer before presenting them to a judge.

Going forward

If you and your partner are not in a rush to divorce, you may wish to consider waiting until the UK implements “no-faults divorce”. This is currently scheduled for autumn 2021, although this is subject to change.

Click here for more articles by Kerry Smith

Author Bio

Kerry Smith is the head of Family Law at K J Smith Solicitors and are experienced in all matters relating to divorce, civil partnerships, cohabitation disputes and collaborative law.

1 4 5 6 7 8 10