Financial and Legal Advice - Page 7

Divorce involves complex financial and legal considerations that can have long-lasting impacts on your future. This section provides expert guidance on crucial topics such as property division, spousal support, tax implications, and legal rights, empowering you to make informed decisions and protect your interests throughout the divorce process.

/

How to Decide if Arbitration is the Right Route in your Divorce

Family Lawyer
Peter Jones
Founder of
Jones Myers
Family Solicitors

An increasing number of couples looking to avoid a lengthy, expensive and public divorce in court are turning to arbitration where an Arbitrator, also referred to as a private judge, decides the outcome of divorce settlements.

Jones Myers founder, Peter Jones, was one of the country’s first arbitrators when this option was introduced in 2012 to resolve differences on financial and property matters. In 2016 the scheme was extended to include disputes relating to children.

Based on our extensive experience, here are some key questions to help decide if arbitration is right for you.

What is arbitration?

Arbitration is in practical terms a private court designed to resolve the financial issues between the parties. You and your ex appoint an Arbitrator of your choice – based on their matrimonial knowledge and experience.

Arbitration preserves your privacy in contrast to going to court when your future is determined by a judge, who is unknown to you.

Another element in the court process which can cause considerable concern is the fact that it enables the media to attend and report on your case.

What does the Arbitrator do?

Arbitrators are independent and impartial third parties who have read all the information and fully understand the issues.

After listening to all the evidence and the representations made on your behalf, the Arbitrator will then make an award – which is similar to the court order but more comprehensive – and which is final.

The “hearing” will be at a venue agreed between you, often an office with sufficient conference facilities. At this session the Arbitrator listens to the relevant facts and evidence and, after considering your individual views, makes a binding ruling, known as an award.

Can I appeal against the award?

You can only appeal against the award in the most exceptional circumstances – i.e. if the Arbitrator misunderstood the law. No appeal is permitted on the basis that you did not like the result.

How long do arbitration cases take to resolve?

Going through arbitration is considerably faster than going to court and offers you and your ex a more flexible and convenient timetable. This speedier process also assists in reducing the level of stress and the financial costs.

What qualifications does an arbitrator have?

Family Law Arbitrators have been trained and qualified pursuant to the standards of the Institute of Family Law Arbitrators of which they are members.

They are invariably experienced family lawyers who are former judges or family law barristers or solicitors.

Click here for more articles by Peter Jones

About Peter Jones

Peter Jones, one of the country’s leading divorce and family lawyers, set up Jones Myers as the first niche family law firm in the north of England in 1992 and has acted for a string of high-profile clients.

He is qualified to arbitrate on cases including financial and property disputes, the break-up of civil partnerships or disputes between cohabitating couples whose relationships have ended.

Renowned for his sympathetic approach, Peter is a a former Deputy District Judge and former national chairman of Resolution who instigated the D5 Group of law firms that promotes excellence in family law. www.jonesmyers.co.uk

Separating Couple Get Legal Advice
/

Can a Separating Couple Get Legal Advice Together?

Samantha Woodham and Harry Gates
Family Law Barristers
4 Paper Buildings

Could a single legal adviser be the pathway to a quicker, cheaper and less traumatic divorce?

We all know someone who has been through a toxic divorce, battling over children and finances in a legal system that seems designed to ratchet up confrontation and cost.

In my day to day practice, I rarely see divorcing couples walk away having spent less than six figures in costs.  The process is terribly slow and adversarial and the emotional cost is enormous.

Ours is the UK’s first service to offer impartial legal advice to both parties at the same time in a bid to reduce conflict and take pressure off the overwhelmed family court system.

What happens at present is that if you are thinking of getting divorced, both partners within a couple appoint their own solicitors from day one. The two parties often give very different ‘takes’ on the facts to their respective solicitors and it can take several months for all that information to be exchanged and for everyone to see the true picture.

We are turning the current model on its head. If we know what’s really happening and what the financial picture is on day one, we can tell you how the court will view it and get the couple talking before they become entrenched in battle or develop unrealistic expectations.

For a fixed fee (in the region of £4,750 plus VAT) each couple has two meetings at the Temple chambers with a family law barrister; a brief introductory session held separately and then a joint advice session together to outline a realistic outcome, which is followed up with a detailed written advice. Typically, the process takes 6-8 weeks.

In fact it’s not new – single source legal advice is the norm in much of Europe, but in the UK solicitors are subject to conflict rules which bar them from advising both parties.  Not so for barristers.

Evidently, it’s not for everyone. Couples need to be in agreement about their asset pool – the onus is on them to prepare their own financial disclosure after the first meeting. Any allegations of non-disclosure – or child safeguarding or abuse issues – and they are advised to instruct separate solicitors. Some 20 per cent fall away in the first (free) screening.

For the vast majority of clients, finances are the key concern, but child arrangements and parenting plans can also be considered at a separate session.  Most important is that it’s not exacerbating conflict.  The aim is to avoid going to court which is so difficult for families – couples fall out over money and they end up in a nuclear winter where every interaction from then onwards is subject to conflict.

So far, the meetings have proved surprisingly calm: The individual sessions are where people can vent if they need to. The joint sessions are quite civilised because the couples are there to get our legal expertise – it’s not an interactive process like mediation.

What also helps is when they hear the other party receive unwelcome advice. Divorce is always a compromise – it’s good to hear that they both have to give a bit. Ultimately, the sooner couples get to the answer, the sooner they can rebuild their lives on the other side of divorce.

About Samantha Woodham and Harry Gates 

Samantha Woodham and Harry Gates are both family law barristers at 4 Paper Buildings. They are each recognised as leading individuals in both the Legal 500 and Chambers and Partners. Their private practices encompass both financial remedy and private law children work.

Alongside this they have set up The Divorce Surgery, a unique service which allows couples to obtain joint, impartial advice at any stage of the divorce process

The Divorce Surgery won the Best Client Service Innovation Award at the Lawyer Awards in June and the Best Client Management Innovation Award at the Legal Week Awards in May. It has been named by the Financial Times in the FT50 Most Innovative Law Firms in Europe.

www.thedivorcesurgery.co.uk

@DivorceSurgeon

Collaboration and Co-operation when Divorce
/

The Benefits of Collaboration and Co-operation when Divorce is Inevitable   

Norman Taylor
Collaborative Family Law Specialist at
Jones Myers

With legal costs reportedly rocketing to £1.5million in Lisa Armstrong and Ant McPartlin’s bitter divorce, it appears the couple will finally meet with their respective lawyers to try to divide their assets.

This very public, acrimonious and high-profile case – which will undoubtedly have taken its toll on the couple and those closest to them – could have taken a more private and dignified route.

In our extensive experience, most couples terminating their marriage prefer to avoid a costly and stressful courtroom battle over dividing their assets.

They also want to ensure their children’s best interests by planning and sharing their future development and well-being.

Collaborative Family Law Week, which runs across September 30 – October 4, is a timely reminder of how the collaborative process puts you in control, enabling you and your ex to work together with your respective lawyers to achieve the right agreement for the whole family.

You and your former partner/spouse each instruct a collaboratively trained lawyer and agree in writing to work together to resolve issues surrounding your separation.

A series of four way meetings with you and your lawyers progress at the pace you jointly set, discussing the needs and interests of everyone directly involved for the best outcome.

To find out if collaboration is the best way forward for you, answer the questions below:

  1. Do you want a divorce process which is fair for you, your ex and your children?
  2. Is it important that this option enables you and your ex to remain on good terms and communicate regularly?
  3. Do you want a process that factors in the ‘human element’ in face-to-face discussions that is often missed or misinterpreted in written communications?
  4. Is it important that you can address issues with dignity and in a safe and secure environment?
  5. Are you seeking a path that helps you all as a family to accept the past and be positive about the future?
  6. Do you want to remain in control of your individual destinies, making choices you both want rather than having decisions imposed by third parties who do not know you?

If you embark on this process we recommend appointing a specialist collaboratively trained lawyer who are members of Resolution, a national organisation of family lawyers committed to non-confrontational divorce and separation.

Click here for more articles by Jones Myers Solicitors

‎About Norman Taylor

Recognised for his work in promoting, developing and championing collaborative law, Norman has over four decades of experience relating to financial issues arising from family and relationship breakdown.

Respected as an enthusiastic advocate of non-confrontational, solution-based resolution of family issues, Norman has extensive experience in medium to high value cases.

Divorcing Couples Need to Focus on Pensions
/

Divorcing Couples Need to Focus on Pensions

Matthew Clemence
Senior Associate
Collaborative Lawyer and Mediator

Couples going through a divorce should not disregard pensions in favour of trying to retain the value of the family home.

Those going through a marriage breakdown are being urged to recognise the importance of claiming a share of their partner’s pension as well as splitting the value of their property.

In a lot of cases people don’t seem to value pensions in the way they should do because they’re not focused on their long-term future and prefer to have the house.

But as part of divorce proceedings, pension funds can be shared. Even when made aware of this information, many people still often prefer the house as they believe it is the most lucrative option.

And only when they approach retirement do they realise they have missed out on a significant retirement income.

And having a smaller pension than your partner does not necessarily mean you will come off worse in the event of a split.

In most cases, unsurprisingly, the higher earner will have a bigger pension pot than the main care giver.

This can be because the parent who has undertaken the majority of maternity or paternity leave will have had gaps in their career to raise children. If there is a big disparity between the two parties’ pensions, the courts will often try and even this out when dividing pensions during divorce proceedings.

Ultimately though, courts look for fairness for the future and will benefit whoever in the relationship is financially weaker, which in our experiences tends to be the parent undertaking the majority of care for the children.

When it comes to dividing pensions, courts do not have to take into consideration future earnings and need only divide the sum as it stands at the time.

The process starts with a look at the capital value of both parties’ pensions. If a couple are approaching, or are over, 50 the court can also be asked to consider the income value of the pensions and divide with reference to this rather than capital value.

As it stands though, this legislation does not apply to cohabiting couples.

In cohabiting relationships people often don’t understand that they can’t claim for pensions. The matrimonial claims do not exist, meaning cohabitees have no opportunity to boost their pension funds irrespective of the length of their relationship.

More than three million unmarried couples choose to live together and cohabitation remains the fastest growing family type in the UK.

With increasing numbers of couples cohabiting, there could be a consequential effect of this in generations to come, meaning people should be even more focused now on their financial future and pension planning.

Everyone should regularly review their pension options and a ‘health check’ with a financial advisor is always sensible.

If you are facing separation or divorce, recognise the benefit of financial advice as much as legal advice and consider each asset individually to work out what you might need now – and in the future.

Click here for more articles by Matthew Clemence

About Matthew Clemence

Matthew qualified as a solicitor in 2001 following completion of his training at a prominent law firm in East London.

Matthew originally joined Prettys in 2003 before leaving to head up the family law team in a firm based in Newmarket in 2009.

Matthew has now re-joined Prettys as a Senior Associate bringing with him a wealth of experience to the family law team.

Notably, Matthew was the husband’s solicitor in the Wright case which received worldwide publicity following the decision passed down by The Court of Appeal involving spousal maintenance, the result of which has dramatically changed the legal landscape in this area of law.

Consequently Matthew now receives instruction from clients both in the UK and abroad seeking advice in this particular area.

In addition, Matthew advises clients on all issues arising from family matters, including divorce, financial resolution, children disputes, pre/post marital agreements as well as financial resolution with cross jurisdictional elements, businesses, trusts and land.

Matthew is collaboratively trained and a member of Resolution.  He is committed to resolving all family matters outside court wherever possible.

prettys.co.uk

mclemence@prettys.co.uk

t 01473 298337

mention of a pre-nup agreement
/

Does the Mention of a Pre-nup Agreement Leave a Bad Taste?

Family Lawyer
Peter Jones
Founder of
Jones Myers
Family Solicitors

The case of reality star Gemma Collins vowing to end the relationship with her boyfriend James ‘Arg’ Argent if he refuses to sign a pre-nup highlights how such contracts can be hard to digest.

Ms Collins’ announcement, which cited the non-disclosure agreement celebrity chef Paul Hollywood presented to his girlfriend Summer Monteys-Fullham and prompted their split, reinforces how such contracts demonstrate the ‘test’ of a relationship.

It is important to highlight that pre-nup agreements can be tailored to a couple’s present and future circumstances – for example by including an increase in provision which is dependent upon the amount of time they spent together.

An understanding of this element of flexibility and variation by both the proposer and recipient of the contract may go a long way to make it more digestible.

Prenups are sought for many reasons. Some couples embarking on their second marriage want to ensure that certain assets are preserved for their children from previous relationships. Others are keen to protect wealth which may have been in their family for generations.

In our experience, the majority of cases pre-nups are widely accepted as the sensible way for couples to avoid the potential distress, acrimony and expense associated with resolving financial matters, should they break up.

If embarking on a pre-nup, it is vital to finalise it in good time. Situations where the contracts can run into problems include when judges think they have been signed in haste and under pressure.

A judge will want to know that the financially weaker partner understood the agreement, was not under duress when they signed it, and took independent legal advice. Courts may ignore or vary pre-nups drawn up in haste.

We always advise that the agreement is signed at least 21 days before the wedding, making full financial disclosure and securing sound legal advice.

Click here for more articles by Peter Jones

About Peter Jones

Peter Jones is one of the country’s leading divorce and family lawyers. A qualified arbitrator and mediator, Peter set up Jones Myers as the first niche family law firm in the north of England in 1992 and has acted for a string of high-profile clients.

Renowned for his sympathetic approach, he is a former national chairman of Resolution, a former Deputy District Judge – and instigated the D5 Group of law firms that promotes excellence in family law. www.jonesmyers.co.uk

Divorce: What Happens when the Woman is the main Breadwinner
/

Divorce: What Happens when the Woman is the main Breadwinner?

Kerry Smith
Kerry Smith
Head of Family Law
at K J Smith Solicitors

In legal terms, divorce is, essentially, the ending of a contract and ideally the parties should work together to bring it to an amicable close, or at the very least, a civil one which both people accept as being reasonably fair.

In the real world, however, divorce can be an unpleasantly sticky mess which family courts have to clean up as best as they can.

The basic ground rules of divorce in the UK

The number one ground rule of divorce in the UK is that if a couple has minor children, their perceived welfare comes before every other consideration.

Family courts will not necessarily give the children exactly what they want (although judges will generally do everything they can to take this into consideration) but they will do everything in their power to provide them with what they need, even if it goes against the wishes of their parents.

After that, the aim of the process is basically to try to create a fair split (literally and metaphorically) so that both parties can move on with their lives.

The question of fairness

In England and Wales, traditionally, it has been considered fair to aim to split assets equally between both parties, regardless of which one was the breadwinner.

It has also been considered fair to order the breadwinner keep the other party indefinitely, so-called “lifelong maintenance”.

Up until relatively recently, this approach, was, arguably, if not necessarily fair, then very far from totally unreasonable. It recognized the fact that the party who “stayed at home with the children” (usually the woman) was making a contribution to the marriage and made it possible for the other half of the couple (usually the man) to go out to work.

It also recognized that younger children required care and that by the time they were old enough to fend for themselves, their carer (usually their mother) might struggle to find a decent job, especially if they had neither trade skills nor education.

That, however, was then, this is now. Women are not just able to work, they are the main breadwinners in about a third of households in the UK and marriages do not necessarily involve children.

In short, the world has moved on and the legal system needs to move on with it.

Laws and attitudes both need to change

In principle there should be absolutely no difference in what happens when a woman is the main breadwinner and what happens when a man is the main breadwinner.

The law itself makes no distinction between these two situations, the challenge is to change attitudes amongst those who apply it (who tend to be people who are middle-aged and older) so that they become less inclined to see women as being automatically in need of protection (meaning maintenance) and men as being necessarily always able to provide for themselves (and possibly others) on an indefinite basis.

The good news is that this change does appear to be trickling through, albeit possibly at a slower pace than some people would have liked.

The Maria Mills case, for example, has highlighted both the issues of the traditional open-ended maintenance system and the fact that judges are becoming more willing to push back on people, including women, who view it as a “meal ticket for life” and who therefore see themselves as entitled to depend on their former partner financially even though their children are adults and they, themselves, are quite capable of working.

Click here for more articles by Kerry Smith

 About Kerry

Kerry Smith is the Head of Family Law at K J Smith Solicitors. K J Smith Solicitors are experienced family solicitors in the Thames Valley area specialising in family mediation, estate planning and divorce and separation.

Questions Divorcing Clients are Embarrassed to Ask
/

5 Questions Divorcing Clients are Embarrassed to Ask

Davina Warrington
Davina Warrington
Divorce and Family Law Solicitor
Woolley & Co Solicitors

In my experience as a divorce and family law solicitor I find that people often feel embarrassed asking basic legal questions as they feel that they will look stupid.

I am asked the same questions time and time again and clients should never feel silly asking as it is important that they understand the basics so that I can do the best job for them.

Here are the most common questions I am asked.

Can we even divorce here if we got married abroad?

Your place of marriage is not really relevant when it comes to a divorce. Your living arrangements and other factors such as where you were born are more important.  The court will need your marriage certificate and if you got married abroad than a translation will be required, but if you have a connection with England or Wales chances are you will be able to divorce here.

We have been living apart a while now, I don’t have to show my ex my bank statements or other private information, do I?

If a financial settlement is to be negotiated fairly, then it is important that both parties provide full and frank disclosure.  Unfortunately, this will include things like bank statements and wage slips.  The law states that until you have a legally binding agreement (known as a Consent Order) then everything remains up for grabs.  This includes the contents of your bank account and your spouse is entitled to see what you have been doing with your finances since the separation.

Can I get a quickie divorce like the celebs?

There is no such thing as a quickie divorce and there never has been.  The media does give a rather unrealistic view on the time frames involved with divorce in this country.  In England, the average time for a divorce is around 12 to 15 weeks.  Whilst I have obtained a Decree Absolute in around 9 weeks, this is quite rare. This is because the divorce happens in stages and is not simply a case of putting a piece of paper into court and waiting for it to be stamped.

Do we need to go to court to finalise the divorce?

The divorce and the finances are two separate issues under English law. If the divorce is dealt with on an agreed basis, then the case will be dealt with by post and no one need ever attend court. The parties will only ever need to go to court if the grounds for divorce or the finances are in dispute and we need the Judge to assist with a decision.

Can we both use the same solicitor?

Divorce solicitors and their firms are not permitted to act for both parties in a divorce.  This is known as a ‘conflict of interest’. Each party will need their own separate divorce lawyer to provide them with legal advice to be sure that the process is independent. This applies even if all matters are agreed.

If you have questions about divorce or separation, however silly you think they are, contact an experienced family law solicitor. Make sure you get the answers you need before you make any important decisions about your family or relationship.

Article first published on the Woolley & Co, Solicitors website here – Questions divorcing clients are embarrassed to ask

Click here for more articles by Woolley & Co Solicitors

About Davina Warrington

Woolley & Co  family solicitor Davina, specialises in divorce, financial settlements and family law.

Davina has always lived, studied and worked locally and deals mainly with clients in Derbyshire, Staffordshire and the wider East Midlands area.

More Round Table
/

Lawyer says More Round Table Work is Necessary to Reduce Stress on Children

Georgie Hall
Head of Private Client

The ‘round table’ way of working is an unusual method many law firms should be adopting, Georgie Hall, Prettys’ partner and head of private client speaks on how the work is necessary to stop stressful child dispute cases going to court and causing worry and anxiety for children and parents alike.

As well as bringing together both parents for a round table discussion sometimes it is necessary to bring in other experts, such as psychologists and counsellors.

This year has seen a seven per cent increase in child dispute applications being made to court, according to Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service.

With child dispute cases often ending up in court, we need to encourage families to sit down and talk through issues which ultimately can be much more productive.

Whilst the court process struggles to alter parental behaviour, the round table process looks to take a more practical and constructive approach.

Even if a court order is in place, it doesn’t mean the problems go away. It is up to the two people involved to do that, which is something we work on during round table discussions.

In some cases, the child may be including in the discussion with proper expert support. This depends on their understanding of the case and in our experience, this is generally considered to be after 11-12 years old.

What we look for is for parents to think in the same way in putting the child first, to find common ground and to agree on a process going forward.

One parent who referred herself and her teenage son for roundtable work, wanted to ensure her son’s voice could be heard. She said: “I felt in safe hands when I was at my most vulnerable and had previously found it hard to trust professionals.”

From issues surrounding where a child should live, to one-off cases involving holidays and schooling, child dispute cases can present themselves in a number of ways.

Communication is the key to resolving the problems and often, people falsely believe the legal process can deliver the undeliverable.

What can often be useful is to get the parents to open up a discussion to see which elements benefit from the legal framework and which most benefit from other non-lawyer children focussed experts.

Sometimes it’s just about making parents aware of the impact they are having on each other and their children. When this is brought to the surface it becomes more straightforward as people become more aware of their behaviour.

When a relationship breaks down it can cause deep divides and going to court won’t always solve this – it’s like putting a plaster on a festering wound. Round table way of working really helps break down barriers.

About Georgie

Georgie has headed the Family Law Department at Prettys from 2003 to 2019 and is now Head of Private Client which encompasses: Family; Estates, Wills and Trusts; Residential Conveyancing; and Personal Injury Team.

Georgie’s entire case load comes by way of recommendation, either from her own clients or other professionals.

Whilst Georgie covers all areas of relationship breakdown whether it be finances, children, pre or post-marriage clarification as to asset division, her hallmark is seen as the quality of client care provided.

Georgie specialises in dispute resolution alternate to court so works as a mediator and a collaborative solicitor; with the bulk of her case load dealt with resolution through negotiation and round table work.

 

How Much Does a Divorce Cost in the UK
/

How Much Does a Divorce Cost in the UK?

Dan Woodruff
Certified Financial Planner and Chartered Wealth Manager

This article aims to answer the question: “How much does a divorce cost in the UK?”

To answer this question, we have used insight from divorce solicitor, Lauren Howard, of Holmes and Hills, based in Braintree, Essex.

We also examine divorce costs from a financial perspective – trying to look beyond the initial divorce, and more into the long-term effects on your finances.

Key points

  • What does the average divorce cost?
  • Cost of a divorce lawyer
  • Cost of a financial settlement or arrangements for children
  • Financial Planning after a divorce
  • About Lauren Howard

What does the average divorce cost?

Lauren Howard tells us: “Divorce is a very difficult time and can be very expensive. It is emotionally demanding and is life-changing. The emotional and financial costs can vary dramatically.”

According to the Money Advice Service, in 2018:

  • Approximately 42 in 100 marriages now end in divorce.
  • The average divorce cost in the UK stands at £14,561, in respect of legal fees and lifestyle costs.

The average divorce cost only tells you part of the story. According to Lauren, “When we think of the cost of divorce, we think about legal fees; however, there are also other costs involved. One party will often move out and if the family are supporting two homes instead of one, this can lead to considerable costs. If either party needs to buy a new home, then we need to consider the costs of sale and purchasing a new property.”

Cost of a divorce lawyer

What is the average cost of a divorce lawyer? It seems that the costs vary according to a number of criteria:

  • The location and experience of the lawyer
  • Whether you opt for fixed fees or hourly rates
  • Whether the divorce is contested
  • Whether you are the petitioner or the respondent
  • Complicating factors in your particular case

Lauren says, “The costs vary depending on what lawyer you use and your particular case. What everyone agrees on, however, is that it is the arguing that costs the money. The more you argue, the more expensive your divorce will be.”

Petitioner divorce costs

You are the petitioner if you are the person seeking the divorce.

Again according to the Money Advice Service, typically you will pay £450 to £950 in solicitor’s fees (+VAT), and £550 as court fee to issue the petition. Therefore, the total cost should be between £1,100 and £1,700.

For an uncontested divorce, Holmes & Hills Solicitors charge a set fee of £600, plus VAT, plus court costs. 

Respondent divorce costs

You are the respondent if your spouse is divorcing you.

Typically fees are lower for the respondent, and you will not need to pay the court fee to issue the petition. The range of solicitor’s fees are typically £250 to £600 (+VAT), making a likely fee of £300 to £720.

Reducing costs by doing the divorce yourself

You can save costs in the short term by not using a solicitor. You will still have to pay the court fee of £550 if you are the petitioner. Saving on legal fees may seem attractive, but you should also consider the risks of this approach:

  • Speed
    If you use a solicitor, you are much more likely to get the divorce completed without unnecessary delays.
  • Technical knowledge and wisdom
    Your divorce lawyer will have completed rigorous training and has experience in navigating the often complex legal system.
  • Getting it right first time
    You should avoid unnecessary mistakes that are more likely if you take on your divorce yourself.
  • Avoiding financial pitfalls
    Your divorce is likely to lead to some sort of financial settlement (see below). Your lawyer works for you, and can advise you as to whether any offer from the other side is fair. Without legal advice, you may accidentally enter into an agreement that could later damage your financial interests.

Cost of a financial settlement or arrangements for children

When you divorce, you not only have to pay to cease the marriage, but may also have additional costs related to your separation of assets, as well as arrangements for any children.

This is one area that can make the case more complex, based on your individual circumstances, and whether both parties agree.

Your divorce solicitor can help you to come to an agreement, and then assist you to incorporate that agreement into a legally binding document. According to the Money Advice Service, costs may vary, depending on the circumstances:

Simple agreement

Solicitor fees may be between £500 to £800 (+VAT), plus a court fee of £50. Therefore, the range of costs may be between £650 to £1,000.

Complex assets

If you have more complex assets, you may need more legal work. The total fee could be up to £1,500.

Mediation costs

You may opt for mediation if you are unable to come to a straightforward agreement with your spouse. The cost of this may be around £1,200.

Divorce court fees

If you are unable to agree on how to settle your financial affairs, or arrangements for the

How Much Does a Divorce Cost in the UK divorce process
Image by Speedy McVroom from Pixabay

children, then you may have to go to court to settle matters. This involves a significant increase in costs. The fees you will pay depend on the additional work done by your solicitor, and this is likely to be performed on an hourly rate rather than a fixed fee, mainly because the work is more difficult to quantify.

Total costs for legal work and court fees typically range between £10,000 and £15,000 (but can be greater).

Lauren reminds us of the value of good legal advice in contested cases: “Your solicitor should be able to provide you with a very good idea as to what you can achieve at Court, and hopefully therefore, you can reach a settlement and avoid Court proceedings.”

The implication is that good legal advice will help you to save money by avoiding unnecessary court-related fees.

Legal aid

Legal aid is quite limited for divorces. According to Lauren, “Legal Aid is available if you are on a very low income for mediation. Legal Aid is also available in some other circumstances, if for example there are concerns in respect of domestic violence.”

Financial planning after a divorce

The divorce cost does not end with the actual proceedings, and the legal end of the marriage. You should also think carefully about how the divorce will affect your future financial security. We explore this issue more in our divorce financial planning case study.

Separation of finances

At the basic level, you will undergo a significant change to your financial situation. When you were married, you would have shared lifestyle costs such as bills, and housing. When you divorce, you will need to budget for a completely new situation. Both parties will need to pay for separate housing, and your bills will change.

Preparing a new budget

As a minimum you should prepare a budget to understand how your finances will change once you have divorced. Your finances will become separate before you divorce, but this is not the end of the matter.

You should also consider how any financial settlement may impact your short-term and long-term future. Be careful to consider whether you are giving up long-term stability in exchange for short-term needs.

The family home

It is very common for the family home to form part of any financial settlement when you divorce. This inevitably means that there will be an impact on your finances. You may have to pay for a mortgage on an ongoing basis, or instead may need to fund a new home if the family home is to be sold.

 Maintenance

You may receive maintenance from your former spouse, particularly if you have children; alternatively, you may have to pay maintenance, if your income is greater than your former spouse.

Take account of the agreed schedule of payments: how much is due, and over what period.

You should consider what you will do when the maintenance stops. If you are receiving maintenance, will you be able to live comfortably? If you are paying maintenance, you may need to hold back certain financial decisions until a later date.

Pensions

Pensions are often one of the largest assets in a divorce settlement. Often pensions are greater value for one spouse than the other. In this case, it is common to pass part of the pension assets from one spouse to the other. This needs careful attention from a financial adviser, as important decisions will need to be made. Read more about pension options on divorce.

How financial planning can help with divorce costs

If you are getting divorced, you may benefit from having a clear view on what your future financial situation could look like. You will want to know that your future is secure and that you will have enough.

A divorce can be a financially challenging time and you will have a number of questions relating to things like the value of your pensions and those of your spouse. You will also be interested to know how much money you will need to maintain your existing lifestyle.

About Dan Woodruff

Dan Woodruff is a certified financial planner and chartered wealth manager with over twenty years’ experience as a financial adviser.

Woodruff Financial Planning helps you to navigate and anticipate significant life changes. Our aim is to help you to ensure your money is managed wisely to give you the financial security that will fund the future and lifestyle that is important to you.

Click here to find out how we help people who are getting divorced.

For more information, please visit Dan’s website.

What Happens if I Don’t Make a Full Disclosure
/

What Happens if I Don’t Make a Full Disclosure to my ex?

Vanessa Fox
Partner and Head of
Family Law
hlw Keeble Hawson

There have been many high profile cases where an ex-partner in a divorce case has hidden money or assets to avoid them being included in the joint assets that will be divided by the court or an arbitrator.

It is surprisingly common for people to attempt to do this and I have worked on many cases where it has happened – including when a client’s ex squirrelled away stacks of £10 notes. In fact, almost every family dispute I have handled has involved an alleged non-disclosure.

Reasons for hiding or undervaluing assets include a wish to save money, a desire for revenge or a belief that the asset or the person’s wealth is too trivial for scrutiny.

However, before the court can reach a financial settlement on separation, both parties have a legal obligation to provide full and frank disclosure of all their assets, including pensions, income and liabilities.

Unless and until this has been done, a financial order cannot be made, even if both parties are happy for it to go ahead.

The court does not take into account who is ‘at fault’, meaning that the ‘wronged’ party has no excuse for not making an honest declaration. Nor is it justified for the poorer partner to fail to disclose.

That person may feel aggrieved at having to list a tiny savings account or income from a part time job, when the other person is far better off. However, the court’s duty is to assess a couple’s joint worth and how this can be divided fairly to meet the reasonable needs of both parties.

Declaring everything that you own does not mean you will receive a reduced settlement, but failing to disclose an asset can produce that result.

If one party fails to fully disclose, it can lead to a more extended, costly dispute.

The person who has not disclosed can, in extreme cases, be ordered to pay the other side’s legal costs and it is usually the case that that person will receive a far less favourable settlement, with more allocated to their ex on top of what would have been awarded in the first place.

There is nearly also extra expense for both parties, relating to applications for court orders for further disclosure or the hiring of a forensic accountant to track down hidden funds, the cost of which is sometimes ordered to be paid by the “non-disclosing” party.

In any event, legal costs always are paid out of the pooled assets that the court would prefer to be spent on the households of the separating couple and their children.

One partner’s dishonest disclosure can severely reduce the funds available to do this, which could diminish everybody’s standard of living and affect a parent’s long term relationship with their offspring.

There are often no winners from somebody’s refusal to fully declare, but there can be many losers. Honesty is always the best policy – no matter what misgivings or lingering bitterness one party has for their ex.

Click here for more articles by Vanessa Fox

About Vanessa

hlw Keeble Hawson partner, Vanessa Fox, has been head of the firm’s family law department since 1991.

The latest edition of the Legal 500 Guide praises Vanessa for her ‘broad knowledge of finance and childcare, and for her passion for collaboration; she is efficient, caring and robust’.

Collaboratively trained and a qualified mediator, Vanessa is a former chair of South Yorkshire Resolution and a member of the Law Society’s Family Law Panel and the Children Panel.

She can be contacted on 0114 290 6232 or at vanessafox@hlwkeeblehawson.co.uk.

Cash Flow Modelling During Divorce
/

The Benefits of Cash Flow Modelling During Divorce Proceedings

Michael King
Michael King FPFS
Chartered Financial Planner

The complex world of Pensions, an asset that tends to be overlooked during a Divorce, can sometimes be a struggle to decipher.

Amid the stress and emotions of a relationship breakdown, it’s vital for both parties to keep a clear head and take pension assets into consideration.

All pension assets – including any pensions already being paid and benefits that have built up – should be taken into account when dividing finances on divorce. Pension funds can then be split, for example, or the value used to offset against other assets in a settlement.

Yet a report by insurer and pensions firm Scottish Widows found that pensions are only discussed in about 30% of cases.

The benefit of Cash flow analysis helps simplify the settlement and will give an understanding of how much income a pension will provide after divorce in retirement, and more importantly, how sustainable this is for the rest of your lifetime whilst helping to provide the income desired or required.

Cash Flow forecasting is not only of great importance in pre-divorce proceedings, but equally as important post-divorce.

A good Independent Financial Advisor should regularly review the pension if and when a Pension Sharing Order is implemented to help ensure the transferred pension and any income stream provided remains on target and fit for purpose within the constraints of individuals’ objectives.

It should never be left to chance as it is frequently the largest source of post-divorce income with individuals who have not accrued enough credits for a full state pension.

Cash Flow Modelling During DivorceYou should never forget the importance of the valuable benefits and commencement date of state pensions. Especially given the many changes over recent years to this valuable retirement income stream.

In cases where divorce occurs when a pension is already in payment, if a tax-free lump sum was previously taken, this will not be an option once the pension has been split. This can cause several issues, notably no access to further tax-free lump sums, but also a potential need for higher income.

An option would be to choose to flexibly access new pension benefits, however, income tax issues will affect not only the amount received, but also the level of the remaining fund value.

It is also of vital importance that a Cash Equivalent Value is not left to expire or alter in extended divorce proceedings, as all income forecasts can be rendered inaccurate or, worse still, at the point the pension benefits are required.

Another important factor will be to check the effects on each individual’s Lifetime Allowance and possible HMRC protection that may have been previously put in place as a result of the divorce and pension order.

Income may not necessarily be generated solely from pensions, other sources include investment income from a portfolio of Individual Savings Accounts, Investment Bonds or shares. They will still need to be factored into the overall situation and can be considered as part of overall post-divorce income requirements as a standalone analysis.

An Independent Financial Advisor can provide advice in areas in which a solicitor cannot, and vice-versa. The benefit of these two professionals working together for a common client outcome in this complex but crucial part of divorce proceedings cannot be underestimated.

If you would like to find out more about Michael and Strategic Solutions Financial Services, click here Michael King

About Michael

Michael has been with the Strategic Solutions Chartered Financial Planners for 5 years. He began his working life in 1986 in accountancy, before moving to Financial Services in 1998.

Specialising in Wealth Management and Retirement Planning, Michael aims to understand his clients’ needs and objectives whilst providing bespoke solutions.

Michael has many very satisfied clients and works closely with other professional advisers across the South Coast, London and Home Counties.

Michael is the 10th Chartered advisor at Strategic Solutions and its 7th Chartered Fellow.

manage your mental health as a single father
/

Three Top Tips for Divorcing Dads

Richard England
Family law solicitor
Woolley & Co

Divorce is not easy for anyone involved. The husband and wife, kids, grandparents, friends. Everyone will be affected in different ways. The key thing is to navigate the process and negotiations in as calm a sea as possible.

In my experience, dads can often feel like they get the rawest deal when it comes to divorce or separation. However, by sticking to just three pieces of advice, you can get through it relatively unscathed and look to the future with optimism and hope.

Tongue biting – If you have kids and those kids are going to live with mum, which is still the most common outcome, try to understand that it is better to bite your tongue rather than argue over every little thing. That will not help anyone, particularly the children who will be confused and upset as it is.

It will be a very emotional time for everyone and it will be difficult. However, it is the right thing to do and can have far-reaching, positive repercussions. Divorce can be like a tug of war and if you pull hard, the other side will retaliate and dig their heels in. Bite your tongue and bide your time and things will calm down. Hopefully, your wife will do the same. If not, you will be doing what is right and it will bring benefits in the longer term.

There is a perception that if you do not retaliate to provocation, your ex will take advantage and push things further and further. In my experience, this is not the norm and family law solicitors should always seek to put in place arrangements that are not significantly skewed to one party or the other.

Be nice – Following on from the last point, you need to build an amicable working platform with your ex. You may stop being married but you do not stop being parents. You will need to talk, organise, and coordinate for a whole range of things. That works if, from the start, you are pragmatic about it. The knock-on effect will be that it makes so many other things easier to sort out, notably finances during the divorce, which is the second biggest issue to sort after the children.

If there is good will between the parties, there is more likely to be common sense across all things that need to be sorted. This is easier said than done. You are getting divorced so you probably don’t like each other much at that point but you have to find a way to have a workable relationship.

Don’t panic about money – In this day and age, it is more likely that there are two incomes into the household to consider, pensions, savings accounts etc. The idea that you are going to be “taken to the cleaners” is not something you should lose sleep about. It may be more common to relinquish some of the value in any property owned, but that could be offset by keeping a greater portion of any pension pot(s) and bank accounts. Put simply, there are four steps to sorting the finances:

  • Establish what assets there are
  • Quantify their value
  • Negotiate on who gets what
  • Get a court order to make the settlement legal.

That’s it. No matter how many or how few assets you have.

So, the recurring theme here is stay calm and reasonable. If you can manage to do that (and it will not be easy) you will be on track to the most satisfactory outcome all round – and it could save you a fortune by bringing an end to the marriage as quickly as possible.

Article first published on the Woolley & Co, Solicitors website here – Divorce Tips for Men and Dads

Click here for more articles by Woolley & Co Solicitors

About Richard England

Richard is a divorce and family solicitor with Woolley & Co based in Sutton Coldfield near Birmingham. He is also a fully qualified family mediator and has over 25 years experience in the legal profession and over 20 years specialising in Family Law. During that time he has built an enviable reputation representing clients in the Midlands and surrounding areas he has also dealt with overseas clients on many occasions.

Family law solicitor, Sutton Coldfield

1 5 6 7 8 9 17